US PTAB IP Litigation
5,620 annotated decisions
Page 162 of 235 · 5,620 total
patent · Jul 31, 2024
National Beef Packing Company, LLC v.Institute for Environmental Health, Inc.
· IPR2024-01156
National Beef and Institute for Environmental Health have settled their disputes over four patents and filed a joint motion to terminate the related IPRs. The motion relies on statutory authority and Board precedent favoring termination after settlement.
patent terminated or settled · Jul 31, 2024
EndyMed Medical Ltd. et al. v.Serendia, LLC
· IPR2024-00842
EndyMed Medical and Serendia settled their inter partes review of U.S. Patent 9,480,836, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding. The settlement agreement is treated as confidential business information.
patent null · Jul 31, 2024
TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd. et al. v.Intellectual Ventures I LLC
· IPR2024-01244
TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd. has filed a petition challenging Intellectual Ventures I LLC's wireless communication patent (7623439) on grounds of obviousness. The challenge centers on whether a minor modification to OFDM cyclic delay diversity is inventive over existing prior art standards.
patent null · Jul 31, 2024
National Beef Packing Company, LLC v.Institute for Environmental Health, Inc.
· IPR2024-01156
National Beef Packing Company challenges Patent 9845486 on grounds of anticipation and obviousness in microbiological detection methods. The Petitioner argues that prior art references, including Rayman and Nagar, disclose or render obvious the claimed steps involving sampling, dilution, and assaying.
patent denied · Jul 31, 2024
TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd. et al. v.Intellectual Ventures I LLC
· IPR2024-01244
The PTAB denied institution of an IPR challenging claims related to Cyclic Diversity Systems (OFDM), finding the petitioner failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing. The Board specifically found deficiencies in meeting the duration requirements when comparing cyclic advance against prior art disclosures like Larsson and IEEE.
patent instituted · Jul 31, 2024
Wiz, Inc. v.Orca Security Ltd.
· IPR2024-01190
Wiz, Inc. successfully convinced the PTAB to institute its IPR challenges against Orca Security Ltd.'s patent (11740926). The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on obviousness grounds over Veselov and Mohanty regarding cloud security methods.
patent instituted · Jul 31, 2024
National Beef Packing Company, LLC v.Institute for Environmental Health, Inc.
· IPR2024-01156
National Beef Packing Company successfully challenged claims 1-30 of the '486 patent in a PTAB Institution Decision, establishing a reasonable likelihood that the methods for pathogen detection are unpatentable. The petitioner relied on prior art references including Rayman and Nagar to demonstrate anticipation and obviousness across multiple grounds.
patent · Jul 29, 2024
Early Warning Services, LLC v.Intellectual Ventures II LLC
· IPR2024-01221
Early Warning Services filed an authorized response defending its right to submit new evidence with a reply to the patent owner’s preliminary response in IPR2024‑01221. The brief argues that the Board’s discretion was properly exercised and that the patent owner had no due‑process prejudice.
patent denied · Jul 29, 2024
Early Warning Services, LLC v.Intellectual Ventures II LLC
· IPR2024-01221
The PTAB Director denied Early Warning Services’ request for a rehearing of the institution decision on Intellectual Ventures’ patent 7,314,167, leaving the institution intact.
patent · Jul 29, 2024
Early Warning Services, LLC v.Intellectual Ventures II LLC
· IPR2024-01221
Early Warning Services petitions the PTAB Director to vacate an institution decision that relied on post‑petition evidence. The Patent Owner claims the Board violated statutory thresholds and due‑process requirements.
patent null · Jul 29, 2024
POSCO Future M Co., Ltd. v.CAMX Power LLC
· IPR2024-01229
POSCO Future M Co., Ltd. has filed a Petition challenging TIAX LLC's patent covering lithium-ion battery cathode materials. The petitioner asserts that the claims are anticipated by Lampe-Onnerud and Takagi, or rendered obvious in view of prior art combinations like Park/Lampe-Onnerud.
patent · Jul 29, 2024
Early Warning Services, LLC v.Intellectual Ventures II LLC
· IPR2024-01221
Early Warning Services challenges Intellectual Ventures II LLC's patent on secure transaction apparatuses, asserting that the claims are anticipated or rendered obvious by prior art. The petitioner relies heavily on references like Wang et al., Drummond, and TAO to establish grounds for unpatentability under 102 and 103. This initial petition sets up a broad challenge across multiple claim sets related to mobile authentication.
patent denied · Jul 29, 2024
POSCO Future M Co., Ltd. v.CAMX Power LLC
· IPR2024-01229
POSCO Future M Co., Ltd.'s IPR challenge against CAMX Power LLC's lithium-ion battery patent was denied by the PTAB. The Board found Petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on grounds of anticipation or obviousness.
patent instituted · Jul 29, 2024
Early Warning Services, LLC v.Intellectual Ventures II LLC
· IPR2024-01221
The PTAB institution decision found sufficient evidence for Early Warning Services, LLC to challenge numerous claims of Intellectual Ventures II LLC based on anticipation and obviousness. The Board adopted the Petitioner’s plain and ordinary meaning for key terms like 'embedded,' rejecting restrictive interpretations by the Patent Owner.
patent final · Jul 29, 2024
Early Warning Services, LLC v.Intellectual Ventures II LLC
· IPR2024-01221
The PTAB denied the petitioner's motion to exclude evidence and ultimately found that the challenged claims were not unpatentable over the cited prior art combinations. The Board adopted a narrow claim construction for 'image capture device,' defining it as an imaging-based barcode reader, rejecting the petitioner’s broader interpretation including laser scanners.
patent terminated or settled · Jul 28, 2024
Hugging Face, Inc. v.FriendliAI Inc.
· IPR2024-01234
Hugging Face and FriendliAI settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 11,442,775 B1, leading the PTAB to terminate the IPR before institution. The settlement documents were ordered to be kept confidential.
patent · Jul 28, 2024
Hugging Face, Inc. v.FriendliAI Inc.
· IPR2024-01234
Hugging Face, Inc. initiated an IPR challenge against FriendliAI Inc., arguing that the challenged claims related to Transformer inference optimization are obvious.
patent · Jul 26, 2024
Thermaltake Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v.Chen, Chien-Hao et al.
· IPR2024-01230
Thermaltake has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all five claims of Lian Li’s illumination‑fan patent, arguing they are obvious over multiple prior‑art references. The petition also argues that the Board should not deny institution under discretionary statutes.
patent · Jul 26, 2024
Thermaltake Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v.Chen, Chien-Hao et al.
· IPR2024-01230
Thermaltake files a response urging the PTAB to deny Lian Li’s request for Director Review of the institution decision in a lighting‑technology patent. The brief stresses procedural impropriety and the lack of any new legal or factual issues.
patent · Jul 26, 2024
Thermaltake Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v.Chen, Chien-Hao et al.
· IPR2024-01230
Thermaltake seeks Director Review to overturn a PTAB decision that found its LED fan patent unpatentable. The request centers on inconsistent claim‑construction positions between the IPR and parallel district‑court litigation.
patent · Jul 26, 2024
Samsung Display Co., Ltd. et al. v.Pictiva Displays International Ltd. et al.
· IPR2024-01187
Samsung Display files a response defending the PTAB’s institution of its IPR against Pictiva’s request for Director Review. The petitioner emphasizes that the Sotera stipulation and prior guidance make a discretionary denial inappropriate.
patent terminated or settled · Jul 26, 2024
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-01233
Dyson and Omachron have reached a settlement and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review of U.S. Patent 9,301,666. The motion cites statutory authority under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) and argues that the Board should end the proceeding before any merits are decided.
patent terminated or settled · Jul 26, 2024
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-01233
Dyson and Omachron settled their inter partes review disputes before the PTAB instituted the trial, resulting in termination of the proceedings and confidentiality of the settlement agreement.
patent terminated or settled · Jul 26, 2024
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-01233
Dyson and Omachron have settled the IPR over U.S. Patent 9,301,666 and jointly moved to terminate the proceeding, requesting the settlement be kept confidential.
