US PTAB IP Litigation
5,620 annotated decisions
Page 144 of 235 · 5,620 total
patent · Sep 10, 2024
UATP IP, LLC et al. v.Slick Slide LLC
· PGR2024-00054
UATP IP petitions PTAB to invalidate Slick Slide's low‑friction slide patent, asserting obviousness over Phillips, Fallgatter, and a nylon‑mesh product, plus lack of enablement and indefiniteness. The petition seeks institution and a finding that the challenged claims are unpatentable.
patent instituted · Sep 10, 2024
UATP IP, LLC et al. v.Slick Slide LLC
· PGR2024-00054
UATP IP successfully challenged the patentability of claims related to low-friction slide systems and mesh layers. The PTAB granted institution after finding likelihood of unpatentability, moving the case toward trial preparation while providing preliminary claim construction guidance on key terms.
patent · Sep 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01396
Samsung has filed a rehearing request challenging the USPTO’s denial of institution for its IPR on the grounds that the agency’s retroactive policy change violated due process, the APA, and statutory limits. The petition seeks reinstatement of the Board’s original institution decision.
patent · Sep 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01396
Headwater Research seeks Director Review to overturn the Board’s institution of an IPR against Samsung’s network‑stack API patent. The Owner argues the Board misapplied discretionary‑denial factors and erred on claim construction. A termination would end the proceeding.
patent · Sep 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01396
Headwater Research files a response to Samsung’s request for rehearing, defending the PTAB’s denial of institution and the recission of the Vidal Memo. The brief argues that discretionary denial is statutory and that Samsung should have foreseen the rescission.
patent · Sep 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01396
Court decision.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Sep 9, 2024
Deltran USA LLC et al. v.The Noco Company
· IPR2024-01219
The PTAB held that all seven claims of The Noco Company's portable jump‑starter patent are unpatentable, finding them obvious over prior‑art jump‑starter and USB‑charging references. The decision follows a petition by Deltran USA LLC asserting obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Sep 9, 2024
Deltran USA LLC et al. v.The Noco Company
· IPR2024-01219
The PTAB held that all eight challenged claims of the Noco Company’s jump‑starter patent are obvious over a combination of prior‑art references, rendering them unpatentable.
patent instituted · Sep 9, 2024
Deltran USA LLC et al. v.The Noco Company
· IPR2024-01219
The PTAB granted institution of an IPR against The Noco Company's 11,584,243 B2 jump‑starter patent. The petitioner, Deltran USA LLC, persuaded the Board that at least one claim is likely unpatentable based on obviousness over combinations such as Richardson + Zhao. All eight challenged claims are now subject to trial.
patent mixed - some claims cancelled, some upheld · Sep 9, 2024
Deltran USA LLC et al. v.The Noco Company
· IPR2024-01219
The PTAB found 22 of the 23 claims of The Noco Company's jump‑starter patent unpatentable in an IPR filed by Deltran USA LLC, leaving only claim 11 intact.
patent instituted · Sep 9, 2024
Deltran USA LLC et al. v.The Noco Company
· IPR2024-01219
The PTAB granted ADC Solutions Auto LLC’s petition to institute an inter partes review of The Noco Company’s portable jump‑starter patent, finding a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability on at least one claim.
patent · Sep 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01397
Samsung has filed an IPR petition challenging all 19 claims of Headwater’s ’918 patent, arguing they are obvious over existing wireless‑device technologies. The petition also contends that PTAB discretion should not block institution, referencing Advanced Bionics and Fintiv factors.
patent null · Sep 9, 2024
Deltran USA LLC et al. v.The Noco Company
· IPR2024-01219
Deltran USA LLC challenges The Noco Company's '203 patent, arguing that all 11 claimed features related to jump starter/battery charging technology are obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Petitioner relies on combinations of prior art references like Richardson and Zhao to demonstrate the lack of inventive step in DC-DC conversion and USB charging apparatuses.
patent denied · Sep 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01397
The PTAB denied Samsung's request to institute an IPR against Headwater Research's patent (9647918), citing procedural redundancy with a previously filed, higher-ranked petition.
patent denied · Sep 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01396
The Director denied institution of an Inter Partes Review, vacating the Board's decision and favoring Headwater Research LLC over Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. based on procedural timing factors.
patent instituted · Sep 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01396
The PTAB granted institution of IPR for Samsung against Headwater, finding a reasonable likelihood that the challenged wireless device claims are unpatentable over Bennett and Vadde.
patent denied · Sep 9, 2024
Roku, Inc. v.Dolby International AB
· IPR2024-01354
Roku, Inc.'s IPR challenge against Dolby International AB's audio signal coding patents was denied by the PTAB. The Board found that Roku failed to establish a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on any obviousness grounds (35 U.S.C. § 103).
patent instituted · Sep 9, 2024
Deltran USA LLC et al. v.The Noco Company
· IPR2024-01219
Deltran USA LLC et al. successfully petitioned to institute an IPR against The Noco Company's patent (11667203) covering jump start/battery charging systems. The Board found sufficient evidence of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103, despite the Patent Owner's counterarguments regarding technical limitations.
patent Final Written Decision · Sep 9, 2024
Deltran USA LLC et al. v.The Noco Company
· IPR2024-01219
The PTAB issued a Final Written Decision finding all 11 challenged claims unpatentable over various prior art combinations. The Petitioner successfully demonstrated obviousness by combining Richardson's jump starter apparatus with Zhao's USB step-up charging technology, and through other combinations involving Epower/Krieger references.
patent · Sep 8, 2024
Charter Communications, Inc. v.Iarnach Technologies Limited
· IPR2024-01287
Charter Communications challenges Iarnach Technologies' 9,287,982 patent covering DOCSIS‑based EPON provisioning. The patent owner argues the petition lacks a reasonable likelihood of invalidity and invokes Fintiv factors to seek a discretionary denial of institution.
patent · Sep 8, 2024
Charter Communications, Inc. v.Iarnach Technologies Limited
· IPR2024-01287
Charter Communications’ IPR petition against Iarnach Technologies’ 9,287,982 patent was deemed insufficient. The Patent Owner’s response argues the petitioner ignored the limiting preamble and failed to provide particularized obviousness arguments.
patent · Sep 8, 2024
Charter Communications, Inc. v.Iarnach Technologies Limited
· IPR2024-01287
Declaration of Kerry Litvin submitted by Iarnach Technologies in response to Charter Communications' IPR petition.
patent · Sep 8, 2024
Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al. v.Stellar, LLC
· IPR2024-01285
Stellar, LLC has filed a Request for Director Review challenging the PTAB’s institution of several IPRs against Motorola Solutions, alleging misapplication of the Fintiv discretionary factors. The petition seeks reversal of the institution decisions under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a).
patent · Sep 8, 2024
Bitsgap Holding OU et al. v.Intercurrency Software LLC
· IPR2024-01278
Bitsgap Holding and related entities filed an unopposed motion to withdraw their IPR petition after reaching a settlement with Intercurrency Software, arguing that the case should be dismissed before any merits are decided.
