US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 114 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent
Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al. v.Stellar, LLC
· IPR2024-01313
Motorola Solutions filed an authorized response defending its body‑worn and in‑car camera patents against a Director Review request. The company argues that the PTAB must honor prior USPTO guidance and a Sotera stipulation, rejecting any discretionary denial.
patent terminated or settled
NormShield Inc. (d/b/a Black Kite Inc.) v.BitSight Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2024-01393
NormShield and BitSight settled their IPR dispute before trial, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding and keep the settlement confidential.
patent
Thermaltake Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v.Chen, Chien-Hao et al.
· IPR2024-01230
Thermaltake has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all five claims of Lian Li’s illumination‑fan patent, arguing they are obvious over multiple prior‑art references. The petition also argues that the Board should not deny institution under discretionary statutes.
patent
Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al. v.Stellar, LLC
· IPR2024-01313
The PTAB notified the parties that the patent owner filed Director Review requests for IPR2024-01284, 01285, 01313, and 01314. Motorola Solutions, the petitioner, may file a concise response within five business days, limited to the issues raised.
patent
NormShield Inc. (d/b/a Black Kite Inc.) v.BitSight Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2024-01393
NormShield and BitSight have jointly moved to terminate IPR2024-01393 following a settlement agreement. The Board has not yet issued an institution decision, and the parties argue that early termination saves costs and resources.
patent
Biofrontera Incorporated et al. v.Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.
· IPR2024-01312
The PTAB has sent a Director Review request to Biofrontera in IPR2024-01312, limiting the petitioner’s response to 15 pages and prohibiting new evidence. The petitioner must respond within five business days.
patent
Biofrontera Incorporated et al. v.Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.
· IPR2024-01312
Sun Pharmaceutical seeks Director Review to overturn a PTAB decision that found several claims of its photodynamic‑therapy device patent unpatentable, arguing the Board mis‑constructed key claim terms and ignored ITC findings.
patent all challenged claims upheld
Altice USA, Inc. et al. v.Touchstream Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2024-01262
Google (challenger) failed to prove obviousness of Touchstream's 2013 smart‑TV control patent. The PTAB affirmed all challenged claims, leaving the patent fully intact.
patent all challenged claims upheld
Altice USA, Inc. et al. v.Touchstream Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2024-01263
Google’s inter partes review of Touchstream’s ’251 patent failed; the Board found no unpatentable subject matter for claims 1, 2, and 5‑9. The petition relied on Muthukumarasamy and Hayward, but the Board concluded the references did not teach the required signal flow or media‑player identification.
patent denied
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Secure Wi-Fi LLC
· IPR2024-01366
The PTAB denied Samsung’s request for Director Review of the institution denial in IPR2024-01366, leaving the original denial in place. The order applies to four related IPRs involving Secure Wi‑Fi patents.
patent
Genius Sports Ltd. v.SportsCastr Inc.
· IPR2024-01310
Genius Sports opposes SportsCastr’s request for Director Review, contending the Board properly analyzed the webserver limitation and that PANDA’s arguments were waived. The Board’s decision should stand and the request be denied.
patent terminated or settled
HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. v.ST CasesTech, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-01301
Harman International Industries and CasesTech have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 8,805,692 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The motion cites statutory authority under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) and requests confidentiality for the settlement agreement.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Harbor Island Dynamic, LLC
· IPR2024-01402
Samsung filed an Authorized Response to the PTAB Director Review request, arguing the Board correctly weighed Factor 2 and should deny the review of Harbor Island Dynamic’s location‑services patent. The brief relies on extensive case law to show that a three‑month trial‑date delta only slightly favors discretionary denial.
patent terminated or settled
HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. v.ST CasesTech, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-01300
Harman and CasesTech settled their IPR dispute before trial, leading the Board to terminate the proceeding and treat the settlement agreement as confidential.
patent
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-01390
Amazon and Nokia have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent No. 9,390,137 and jointly filed a request to treat the settlement documents as confidential and to terminate the IPR.
patent terminated or settled
HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. v.ST CasesTech, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-01301
Harman and CasesTech have settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 8,805,692 and jointly filed a motion to have the settlement agreement treated as confidential, seeking termination of the proceeding.
patent
Tableau Software, LLC et al. v.iCharts LLC
· IPR2024-01389
Tableau Software seeks Director Review of a PTAB decision denying institution of its IPR against iCharts’ interactive‑chart patent. The petitioner contends the Board erred on claim constructions, motivation to combine, and QlikView disclosures.
patent
HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. v.ST CasesTech, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-01300
Harman and CasesTech have settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 11,589,329 and jointly filed a motion to have the settlement agreement treated as confidential and to terminate the proceeding.
patent terminated or settled
HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. v.ST CasesTech, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-01299
Harman and ST CasesTech have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 8,319,620 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The Board is asked to dismiss the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. §317(a).
patent terminated or settled
Bitsgap Holding OU et al. v.Intercurrency Software LLC
· IPR2024-01293
Bitsgap Holding and related crypto‑trading entities settled their dispute with Intercurrency Software, resulting in the Board terminating four IPRs before trial. The settlement agreement was kept confidential per 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
patent
Tableau Software, LLC et al. v.iCharts LLC
· IPR2024-01387
iCharts LLC seeks Director Review to overturn the PTAB’s decision to institute an IPR against its 2012 data‑visualization patent, arguing the case would duplicate district‑court litigation and waste Board resources.
patent terminated or settled
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01348
Samsung Electronics and Anonymous Media Research Holdings settled their IPR before institution, dismissing the petition and the patent with prejudice.
patent terminated or settled
Bitsgap Holding OU et al. v.Intercurrency Software LLC
· IPR2024-01292
Bitsgap Holding OU and related crypto firms settled with Intercurrency Software LLC, filing an unopposed motion to withdraw their IPR petitions. The PTAB granted the motion and terminated the proceedings, treating the settlement agreement as confidential.
patent
Garmin International, Inc. et al. v.Saris Equipment, LLC
· IPR2024-01294
Garmin and Saris have filed a joint request to keep their settlement confidential and to terminate the IPR over patent 10,434,394.
