US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 107 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent instituted · Apr 18, 2025
ADC Solutions Auto LLC et al. v.The Noco Company
· IPR2025-00885
The PTAB instituted an inter partes review of claims 1‑11 of the ’203 battery‑charger patent and granted ADC Solutions Auto LLC’s motion to join the existing Deltran IPR, assigning it an understudy role.
patent · Apr 18, 2025
Microsoft Corp. v.VirtaMove, Corp.
· IPR2025-00854
Microsoft and VirtaMove jointly filed a motion asking the PTAB to keep their settlement agreement confidential under 35 U.S.C. §317(b). They argue the agreement contains highly sensitive business information that could harm their interests if disclosed.
patent terminated or settled · Apr 18, 2025
Microsoft Corp. v.VirtaMove, Corp.
· IPR2025-00855
Microsoft and VirtaMove have entered a settlement that resolves all disputes over patent 7,784,058. They jointly moved to terminate the pending inter partes review, citing 35 U.S.C. §317. The Board has not yet ruled on institution, making termination permissible.
patent terminated or settled · Apr 18, 2025
Microsoft Corp. v.VirtaMove, Corp.
· IPR2025-00854
Microsoft and VirtaMove have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 7,784,058 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The Board has not yet decided on institution, making termination permissible under 35 U.S.C. §317.
patent · Apr 18, 2025
Microsoft Corp. v.VirtaMove, Corp.
· IPR2025-00853
Microsoft and VirtaMove filed a joint motion requesting that their settlement agreement be kept confidential under 35 U.S.C. §317(b). The parties contend the agreement contains highly sensitive business information that should not be disclosed publicly.
patent terminated or settled · Apr 18, 2025
Microsoft Corp. v.VirtaMove, Corp.
· IPR2025-00853
Microsoft and VirtaMove have settled all disputes over Patent 7,784,058 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The Board is asked to end the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. § 317.
patent instituted · Apr 18, 2025
ADC Solutions Auto LLC et al. v.The Noco Company
· IPR2025-00885
The PTAB granted ADC Solutions Auto’s petition to institute inter partes review of The Noco Company’s 11,584,243 B2 jump‑starter patent, finding a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability for several claims.
patent terminated or settled · Apr 18, 2025
Microsoft Corp. v.VirtaMove, Corp.
· IPR2025-00852
Microsoft and cloud‑migration startup VirtaMove settled their inter‑partes review dispute before trial, leading the Board to terminate the IPRs and keep the settlement confidential.
patent mixed - some claims cancelled, some upheld · Apr 18, 2025
ADC Solutions Auto LLC et al. v.The Noco Company
· IPR2025-00885
In IPR2020‑00944, the PTAB held that 22 of the 23 claims of The Noco Company's jump‑starter patent are unpatentable, finding the claims anticipated or obvious over multiple prior‑art references. Claim 11 survived.
patent terminated or settled · Apr 18, 2025
Microsoft Corp. v.VirtaMove, Corp.
· IPR2025-00851
Microsoft and VirtaMove have reached a settlement that resolves all disputes over the ’814 virtualization patent, prompting a joint motion to terminate the pending inter partes review.
patent terminated or settled · Apr 18, 2025
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Datonics LLC
· IPR2025-00873
Amazon and Datonics have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 10,984,445 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The Board is asked to end the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. §317.
patent · Apr 18, 2025
Microsoft Corp. v.VirtaMove, Corp.
· IPR2025-00852
Microsoft and VirtaMove filed a joint motion requesting that their settlement agreement be treated as business confidential information under 35 U.S.C. §317(b). The parties argue the agreement contains highly sensitive information that could harm their businesses if disclosed.
patent · Apr 18, 2025
Microsoft Corp. v.VirtaMove, Corp.
· IPR2025-00851
Microsoft and VirtaMove filed a joint motion requesting that their settlement agreement be treated as business confidential information under 35 U.S.C. §317(b). The motion seeks to keep the agreement separate from the public patent file and restrict access.
patent terminated or settled · Apr 18, 2025
Microsoft Corp. v.VirtaMove, Corp.
· IPR2025-00852
Microsoft and virtualization startup VirtaMove settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 7,519,814, filing a joint motion to terminate the pending inter partes review.
patent terminated or settled · Apr 18, 2025
Microsoft Corp. v.VirtaMove, Corp.
· IPR2025-00850
Microsoft and VirtaMove filed a joint motion to terminate IPR 2025-00850 after reaching a settlement that resolves all disputes over the ’814 patent. The Board is asked to end the inter partes review and keep the agreement confidential.
patent terminated or settled · Apr 18, 2025
Microsoft Corp. v.VirtaMove, Corp.
· IPR2025-00855
Microsoft and VirtaMove settled their inter partes review dispute over Patent 7,784,058. The Board granted the joint motion to terminate, dismissing the petitions and keeping the settlement confidential.
patent · Apr 18, 2025
Microsoft Corp. v.VirtaMove, Corp.
· IPR2025-00855
Microsoft and VirtaMove jointly filed a motion asking the PTAB to keep their settlement agreement confidential under 35 U.S.C. §317(b), citing the sensitivity of the information.
patent terminated or settled · Apr 18, 2025
Microsoft Corp. v.VirtaMove, Corp.
· IPR2025-00854
Microsoft and VirtaMove settled their inter partes review dispute before trial. The Board granted a joint motion to terminate the IPRs and ordered the settlement agreement to be kept confidential.
patent terminated or settled · Apr 18, 2025
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Datonics LLC
· IPR2025-00873
Amazon and Datonics have settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 10,984,445 and jointly request the Board to terminate the proceeding while keeping the settlement agreement confidential.
patent · Apr 18, 2025
Microsoft Corp. v.VirtaMove, Corp.
· IPR2025-00850
Microsoft and VirtaMove filed a joint motion asking the PTAB to keep their settlement agreement confidential under 35 U.S.C. §317(b). The parties contend the agreement contains highly sensitive business information that could harm them if disclosed.
patent · Apr 18, 2025
Microsoft Corp. v.VirtaMove, Corp.
· IPR2025-00849
Microsoft and VirtaMove jointly filed a motion asking the PTAB to keep their settlement agreement confidential under 35 U.S.C. §317(b). The parties claim disclosure would harm their business interests.
patent terminated or settled · Apr 18, 2025
Microsoft Corp. v.VirtaMove, Corp.
· IPR2025-00849
Microsoft and VirtaMove have entered a settlement that resolves all disputes over U.S. Patent 7,519,814. The parties filed a joint motion to terminate the inter partes review, citing the lack of an institution decision and the settlement agreement. The Board is asked to grant the termination and keep the agreement confidential.
patent terminated or settled · Apr 18, 2025
Microsoft Corp. v.VirtaMove, Corp.
· IPR2025-00850
Microsoft and cloud‑migration startup VirtaMove settled their IPR dispute, leading the Board to terminate the proceedings before trial.
patent denied · Apr 18, 2025
OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. et al. v.Pantech Corporation
· IPR2025-00783
Pantech successfully defended the PTAB’s discretionary denial of an IPR against OnePlus, keeping its LTE/5G patents intact. The Board found no examiner error or unpatentable prior art and affirmed the Director’s decision under § 314(a).
