Litigation
75 litigation decisions from Paris (FR) Local Division.
Litigation Decisions
75 cases | Page 3 of 3
Novawell v.C-Kore Systems Limited
This is a procedural order from the Paris Local Division concerning an infringement action related to European Patent EP2265793, owned by C-Kore Systems Limited. Following a Saisie Order issued on 14 November 2023, the parties agreed on the composition of a confidentiality club to review seized documents containing trade secrets. The Court approved the parties' agreed list of persons, holding that while Rule 262A RoP requires at least one natural person from each party, parties may mutually agree to exclude natural persons from the parties themselves, provided the principle of fair trial is preserved.
Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd v.Laser Components SAS
This is a procedural order from the Local Division Paris of the Unified Patent Court in an infringement action concerning European Patent EP3404726. The defendant Laser Components SAS requested an extension of the deadline to file its statement of defense, citing technical difficulties experienced by the intervening third party Photon Wave Co., Ltd. and the need for coordination. The court rejected the request, holding that the intervenor had not suffered prejudice and that the defendant had not demonstrated its own technical difficulties, and ordered Laser Components to submit its defense brief by March 18, 2024.
C-Kore Systems Limited v.Novawell
This case concerns a review of an ex parte order for preserving evidence (saisie) issued by the Paris Local Division. C-Kore Systems Limited, proprietor of European patent EP 2 265 793 relating to subsea testing apparatus, obtained an ex parte saisie order against Novawell, a former customer alleged to have developed a competing product called 'SICOM'. Novawell sought to have the order revoked, but the Court dismissed the review application in its entirety, finding the request admissible, the evidence sufficient, and the measures compliant with both UPC rules and French national law.
ICPillar LLC v.ARM Limited and Others (Procedural Order on Alternative Service)
ICPillar LLC, proprietor of European Patent EP3000239, filed an infringement action against 12 defendants of the ARM group. This procedural order addressed ICPillar's application under Rule 275.2 of the Rules of Procedure for an alternative method of service of the Statement of Claim on four UK-based defendants (Arm Limited, Apical Limited, Simulity Labs Limited, and SVF Holdco). The Paris Local Division deemed the Statement of Claim served on 7 February 2024, based on bailiff-confirmed deliveries via FedEx and DHL.
Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd v.Laser Components SAS
This is a procedural order from the Local Division Paris of the Unified Patent Court concerning an infringement action (ACT_588685/2023) related to European Patent EP3404726 held by Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. The defendant, Laser Components SAS, requested a change of the language of procedure from French to English, the language in which the patent was granted. The judge-rapporteur rejected the request, finding that the claimant's choice of French respected the rights of the French defendant and that no serious reasons of convenience or fairness justified a change of language.
Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. v.Dexcom Inc., Dexcom France SAS, Dexcom International Limited
This is a procedural order from the Paris Local Division concerning an infringement action filed by Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. against three Dexcom entities regarding European Patent EP3988471. The order addresses the extension and alignment of deadlines for filing the Statement of Defence, following difficulties with service of the Statement of Claim. The Judge-Rapporteur aligned the starting point for the Statement of Defence period for all three defendants to 15/01/2024, with the deadline set at 15/04/2024.
SAS LASER COMPONENTS v.Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd
Unified Patent Court decision.
ICPillar LLC v.Arm Poland Sp. z.o.o. and Others
This is a procedural order from the Paris Local Division of the Unified Patent Court concerning an application by ICPillar LLC for an alternative method of service of its Statement of Claim in an infringement action against 12 defendants belonging to the ARM group of companies. The Court authorized alternative methods of service for Arm Poland Sp. z.o.o. after standard service failed, but dismissed the request regarding UK entities because service under the Hague Service Convention was still in progress.
ICPillar LLC v.ARM Limited Apical Limited Arm Poland Sp. z.o.o Simulity Labs Limited Hyperglance limited SVF Holdco
Unified Patent Court decision.
DexCom, Inc. v.Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Diabetes Care Inc., Abbott France, Abbott, Abbott B.V., Abbott S.r.l., Abbott Scandinavia Aktiebolag, Abbott Oy, Abbott Gesellschaft m.b.H., Abbott Laboratories A/S, Abbott GmbH, Abbott Diagnostics GmbH, Abbott Logistics B.V., and Newyu, Inc.
This is a procedural order from the Paris Local Division concerning an infringement action brought by DexCom, Inc. against fourteen defendants, primarily comprising various Abbott entities and Newyu, Inc., regarding European Patent EP3831282. The order addresses service difficulties and aligns the deadline for filing the Statement of Defence across all defendants. The Judge-Rapporteur accepted the parties' agreed extension, setting the Statement of Defence deadline to 15 March 2024, with the starting point aligned to 15 December 2023.
Dexcom, Inc. v.Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Diabetes Care inc, Abbott France, Abbott NV/SA, Abbott B.V, Abbott S.r.l, Abbott Sacandinavia Aktiebolag, Abbott GmbH, Abbott Diagnostics Gmbh, Abbott Logistics B.V
Unified Patent Court decision.
Dexcom, Inc. v.Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Diabetes Care inc, Abbott France, Abbott NV/SA, Abbott B.V, Abbott S.r.l, Abbott Sacandinavia Aktiebolag, Abbott GmbH, Abbott Diagnostics Gmbh, Abbott Logistics B.V
Unified Patent Court decision.
Dexcom, Inc. v.Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Diabetes Care inc, Abbott France, Abbott NV/SA, Abbott B.V, Abbott S.r.l, Abbott Sacandinavia Aktiebolag, Abbott GmbH, Abbott Diagnostics Gmbh, Abbott Logistics B.V
Unified Patent Court decision.
HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P v.LAMA FRANCE
Unified Patent Court decision.
C-KORE SYSTEMS LIMITED v.NOVAWELL
Unified Patent Court decision.
Facing a similar IP matter?
Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.