US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 76 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent · Jun 16, 2025
ASUSTeK Computer Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2025-01153
ASUS has filed an IPR petition challenging Nokia’s U.S. Patent 10,536,714 covering motion‑vector prediction methods. The petition asserts obviousness over earlier video‑coding publications (Rusert, Karczewicz, Lin) and seeks cancellation of claims 1‑30. The case is pending institution.
patent · Jun 16, 2025
Evenflo Company, Inc. v.Baby Jogger, LLC et al.
· IPR2025-01122
Evenflo has filed an IPR petition challenging all 16 claims of Baby Jogger’s stroller patent, asserting lack of priority and obviousness over multiple prior‑art references. The petition seeks cancellation of the claims.
patent · Jun 16, 2025
Snap, Inc. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2025-01114
Snap, Inc. has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate Nokia Technologies' U.S. Patent 8,175,148 covering video‑encoding quantization techniques. The petition asserts obviousness over MPEG‑1 and H.263 standards and requests cancellation of all 23 claims.
patent instituted · Jun 16, 2025
Almendra Pte. Ltd. et al. v.Fienile Agronecócios LTDA
· PGR2025-00055
The PTAB granted institution for PGR2025-00055, allowing the challenge to proceed to merits review after determining a reasonable likelihood of prevailing.
patent denied · Jun 16, 2025
Amazon.com, Services LLC v.VB Assets, LLC
· IPR2025-01167
The USPTO Director denied the institution of an Inter Partes Review (IPR) petition filed by Amazon.com against VB Assets' patent 11087385.
patent denied · Jun 16, 2025
AT&T Services, Inc. et al. v.USTA Technology, LLC
· IPR2025-01166
The USPTO Board denied the institution of Inter Partes Review (IPR) filed by AT&T Services against USTA Technology's patent RE47720.
patent instituted · Jun 16, 2025
ASUSTeK Computer Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2025-01153
The PTAB granted institution for IPR2025-01153, allowing ASUSTeK to challenge Nokia's patent 10536714 after demonstrating a reasonable likelihood of prevailing.
patent instituted · Jun 16, 2025
Evenflo Company, Inc. v.Baby Jogger, LLC et al.
· IPR2025-01122
The USPTO granted institution for IPR2025-01122 after reviewing the petitioner's likelihood of prevailing. This moves the case forward to a merits trial.
patent denied · Jun 16, 2025
Snap, Inc. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2025-01114
The USPTO Board denied institution for the IPR challenge brought by Snap, Inc. against Nokia's patent 8175148.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Jun 13, 2025
Google LLC v.Valtrus Innovations Limited et al.
· IPR2025-01157
The PTAB held that Google’s challenge to Valtrus’s 7,748,005 patent succeeded, finding all twenty claims unpatentable for lack of written‑description support and obviousness over the McCarthy application and Gien micro‑kernel reference.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Jun 13, 2025
Google LLC v.Valtrus Innovations Limited et al.
· IPR2025-01157
The PTAB held that Google proved all 21 claims of Valtrus’s ’454 patent are obvious over Colby, Eilert, and Jindal, rendering the entire patent unpatentable.
patent all challenged claims upheld · Jun 13, 2025
Google LLC v.Valtrus Innovations Limited et al.
· IPR2025-01157
Google’s IPR against Valtrus’s 6,728,704 B2 patent was decided with all 23 challenged claims upheld. The Board found the prior‑art Bushee not anticipatory and rejected obviousness arguments over Voorhees, Tso, and Koppel.
patent terminated or settled · Jun 13, 2025
Element TV Company, LP et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2025-01108
Nokia and Element TV have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 7,532,808 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review before it was instituted.
patent terminated or settled · Jun 13, 2025
Element TV Company, LP et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2025-01109
Element TV and Nokia have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 7,532,808 and jointly moved to terminate the pending inter partes review. The motion cites statutory authority and public‑policy reasons for termination before the proceeding is instituted.
patent terminated or settled · Jun 13, 2025
Element TV Company, LP et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2025-01108
Element TV and Nokia reached a settlement, leading the PTAB to terminate IPR2025‑01108 before any institution decision. The Board granted the joint motion to terminate and ordered the settlement agreement kept confidential.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Jun 13, 2025
Google LLC v.Valtrus Innovations Limited et al.
· IPR2025-01157
The PTAB held that Google’s obviousness challenge succeeded, finding all 19 claims of Valtrus’s ’764 patent unpatentable over the Li and Edlund prior‑art references. The decision also denied Google’s motion to exclude exhibits and granted motions to seal.
patent · Jun 13, 2025
Element TV Company, LP et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2025-01108
Element TV and Nokia have reached a settlement and jointly request that the Board treat the settlement agreement as confidential, moving to terminate the IPR over Nokia’s video broadcast patent.
patent · Jun 13, 2025
Element TV Company, LP et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2025-01109
Element TV and Nokia have reached a settlement and jointly request the PTAB to treat the agreement as confidential and terminate the IPR. The motion relies on statutory provisions protecting settlement confidentiality.
patent · Jun 13, 2025
Apple Inc. v.Advanced Coding Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-01158
Apple has filed an IPR petition challenging six claims of a video‑compression patent owned by Advanced Coding Technologies, arguing they are obvious over prior‑art references Phek, YuChuan, He and Martins. The petition seeks institution and cancellation of the claims.
patent · Jun 13, 2025
Baby Generation, Inc. d/b/a Mockingbird et al. v.Baby Jogger, LLC et al.
· IPR2025-01120
Petitioner Baby Generation seeks IPR cancellation of Baby Jogger’s stroller patent, arguing lack of support for a “parallel” feature and obviousness over multiple prior‑art stroller designs.
patent · Jun 13, 2025
Google LLC v.Valtrus Innovations Limited et al.
· IPR2025-01157
Google has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 15 claims of Valtrus’s ’967 patent covering redundant power supplies. The petition relies on anticipation by Zak and obviousness over Susong, Chang, and Edelen, and argues that discretionary denial is unwarranted.
patent · Jun 13, 2025
Solventum Corporation v.Wound Healing Technologies Corp.
· IPR2025-01042
Solventum Corp. has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate all 13 claims of Wound Healing Technologies' wound‑dressing patent. The petition argues the claims are obvious over prior‑art references such as Argenta, Hu, Biggie and Lockwood.
patent · Jun 13, 2025
ROBE lighting s.r.o. v.Guangzhou Haoyang Electronic Co., Ltd.
· IPR2025-01016
ROBE Lighting petitions the PTAB to invalidate all 13 claims of Guangzhou Haoyang’s ‘373 patent covering a self‑testing stage light fixture, asserting anticipation and obviousness over the Jurik luminaire patents.
patent · Jun 13, 2025
Element TV Company, LP et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2025-01109
Element TV has filed an IPR petition challenging Nokia’s ’808 video‑coding patent, alleging obviousness over the Karczewicz publication and the MPEG‑1/H.263 standards. The petition invokes 35 U.S.C. §103 for all 21 challenged claims.
