US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 73 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent denied · Jun 24, 2025
Aerin Medical Inc. v.Neurent Medical Ltd. et al.
· IPR2025-01125
The USPTO Board denied the institution of several IPR petitions, meaning no trials will proceed for these challenges.
patent terminated or settled · Jun 23, 2025
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. et al. v.Champion Power Equipment, Inc.
· IPR2025-01121
Harbor Freight Tools and MWE Investments settled their IPR disputes with Champion Power Equipment, resulting in the termination of the proceedings against them while Generac remains as a petitioner.
patent · Jun 23, 2025
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. et al. v.Champion Power Equipment, Inc.
· IPR2025-01121
Harbor Freight and Champion have filed a joint request asking the PTAB to treat their Settlement Agreement as business‑confidential information, keeping it separate from the IPR file for patent 11,143,120. The request cites 35 U.S.C. §317(b) and seeks limited disclosure only to federal agencies or parties with good cause.
patent denied · Jun 23, 2025
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. et al. v.Champion Power Equipment, Inc.
· IPR2025-01121
Harbor Freight and co‑petitioners sought Director Review of a denied institution decision for a multi‑fuel generator patent. The Board found no inconsistency with the earlier ’034 decision and denied the request, leaving Champion Power’s patent intact.
patent instituted · Jun 23, 2025
Snap Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2025-01014
The PTAB instituted an inter partes review of Nokia’s 8,050,321 patent covering video‑frame grouping, finding a reasonable likelihood that Amazon’s challenges based on MPEG‑1, Kim, and Yagasaki would succeed.
patent terminated or settled · Jun 23, 2025
Starbucks Corporation et al. v.Pi-Design AG et al.
· IPR2025-01178
Starbucks and Pi‑Design settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 8,695,486 before the trial was instituted. The Board granted the parties’ joint motion to terminate and kept the settlement agreement confidential.
patent · Jun 23, 2025
Starbucks Corporation et al. v.Pi-Design AG et al.
· IPR2025-01178
Starbucks and Pi‑Design have settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 8,695,486 and jointly seek to keep the settlement confidential under statutory provisions.
patent denied · Jun 23, 2025
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. et al. v.Champion Power Equipment, Inc.
· IPR2025-01121
The USPTO denied Generac's request for Director Review of the institution denial in IPR2025-01121, leaving the decision not to institute the IPR intact.
patent terminated or settled · Jun 23, 2025
Nintendo Co. Ltd. et al. v.Resonant Systems, Inc.
· IPR2025-01098
Nintendo withdrew its IPR against Resonant Systems’ U.S. Patent 8,860,337 covering gaming controller haptic feedback. The Board granted the motion, terminating the proceeding before any institution or claim analysis.
patent terminated or settled · Jun 23, 2025
Starbucks Corporation et al. v.Pi-Design AG et al.
· IPR2025-01178
Starbucks and Pi‑Design have reached a settlement and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 8,695,486. The Board is asked to end the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. §317.
patent terminated or settled · Jun 23, 2025
Nintendo Co. Ltd. et al. v.Resonant Systems, Inc.
· IPR2025-01098
Nintendo filed a notice of intent to dismiss its IPR petition against Resonant Systems’ vibration‑module patent, citing the Board’s earlier institution of a separate petition that already invalidated the claims.
patent · Jun 23, 2025
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. et al. v.Champion Power Equipment, Inc.
· IPR2025-01121
Harbor Freight Tools, Champion Power Equipment and other petitioners have reached a settlement in IPR2025-01121. The parties request that the settlement be kept confidential under 35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74, and MWE seeks to withdraw from the proceeding.
patent · Jun 23, 2025
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. et al. v.Champion Power Equipment, Inc.
· IPR2025-01121
Petitioners seek Director review after the USPTO denied institution of a multi‑fuel generator patent, arguing the decision conflicts with a prior institution of the parent ’034 patent. They assert the same obviousness grounds apply and that the denial is arbitrary and capricious.
patent · Jun 23, 2025
Nintendo Co. Ltd. et al. v.Resonant Systems, Inc.
· IPR2025-01098
Nintendo filed a motion to withdraw its IPR against Resonant Systems’ 8,860,337 patent. The Board has authorized the filing, and the patent owner does not oppose the withdrawal.
patent · Jun 23, 2025
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. et al. v.Champion Power Equipment, Inc.
· IPR2025-01121
Court decision.
patent · Jun 23, 2025
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. et al. v.Champion Power Equipment, Inc.
· IPR2025-01121
Harbor Freight, Generac and MWE petition the PTAB to invalidate 19 claims of Champion Power’s multi‑fuel engine patent, citing extensive prior‑art references. The petition argues anticipation and obviousness under §§102 and 103 and seeks institution of the IPR.
patent · Jun 23, 2025
Starbucks Corporation et al. v.Pi-Design AG et al.
· IPR2025-01178
Starbucks has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 22 claims of Pi‑Design’s French‑press patent, arguing anticipation and obviousness over a suite of prior‑art coffee‑maker references.
patent · Jun 23, 2025
Nintendo Co. Ltd. et al. v.Resonant Systems, Inc.
· IPR2025-01098
Nintendo has filed an IPR petition challenging claims 2 and 3 of Resonant Systems’ linear vibration module patent, asserting obviousness over multiple prior‑art references and seeking cancellation of the claims.
patent · Jun 23, 2025
Snap Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2025-01014
Snap Inc. and Hisense have filed an IPR petition challenging Nokia’s 8,050,321 video‑coding patent, asserting that all 11 claims are obvious over prior‑art patents Kim and Adolph.
patent denied · Jun 23, 2025
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. et al. v.Champion Power Equipment, Inc.
· IPR2025-01121
The PTAB denied institution of IPR2025-01121 in the dispute between Harbor Freight Tools and Champion Power Equipment because the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing.
patent denied · Jun 23, 2025
Snap Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2025-01014
The USPTO denied institution for several IPR petitions filed by Snap Inc. against Nokia Technologies Oy, meaning no trial will proceed.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Jun 20, 2025
Microsoft Corporation et al. v.Lemko Corporation
· IPR2025-01142
Microsoft and Affirmed Networks successfully challenged Lemko’s 7,855,988 patent, with the PTAB finding all asserted claims unpatentable due to anticipation by the Flore publication.
patent · Jun 20, 2025
Infineon Technologies Americas Corp. et al. v.MOSAID Technologies Inc.
· IPR2025-01171
MOSAID Technologies has filed a Director review request challenging the PTAB’s decision to institute an IPR against its 7,051,306 patent. The request contends that Infineon’s petition inconsistently handles claim constructions already litigated in district court, violating Board guidance and warranting reversal of the institution.
patent · Jun 20, 2025
Infineon Technologies Americas Corp. et al. v.MOSAID Technologies Inc.
· IPR2025-01171
The PTAB notified the parties that a Director Review request has been filed in IPR2025-01171 over patent 7,051,306. The petitioner has five business days to submit a limited response; no new evidence is allowed.
