US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 58 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent terminated or settled
Henri Daussi, LLC v.ECNA, LLC et al.
· IPR2025-00807
Henri Daussi, LLC and ECNA, LLC filed a joint motion to terminate IPR2025-00807 after reaching a settlement, ending the Board proceeding without a final written decision.
patent
Amphenol Corporation v.Credo Technology Group Ltd.
· IPR2025-00834
Amphenol and Credo have settled their IPR dispute over U.S. Patent 11,012,252 and jointly request that the settlement agreement be kept confidential under statutory provisions.
patent denied
Google LLC v.Sandpiper CDN, LLC
· IPR2025-00806
The Director denied Google’s request for review of the institution decision in IPR2025-00806, leaving the Sandpiper CDN patent institution intact.
patent denied
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Audio Pod IP, LLC
· IPR2025-00757
The USPTO denied Amazon’s request for Director Review of the decision denying institution of multiple IPRs involving Audio Pod IP’s patents. The denial applies to all listed proceedings.
patent
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Audio Pod IP, LLC
· IPR2025-00757
Amazon and its affiliates have filed a Request for Director Review challenging the USPTO’s new six‑year “settled expectations” rule that led to a discretionary denial of institution for their IPR petition covering patent 10,091,266.
patent
Intel Corporation v.Advanced Cluster Systems, Inc.
· IPR2025-00794
The Director denied Intel’s request for rehearing of the discretionary denial and institution decision in IPR2025-00794, leaving the patent challenge uninstated.
patent terminated or settled
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. et al. v.Champion Power Equipment, Inc.
· IPR2025-00805
The PTAB granted a settlement motion, terminating the IPRs against Harbor Freight Tools USA Inc. and MWE Investments, LLC, while keeping the settlement agreements confidential. Generac Power Systems remains as the sole petitioner in the related proceedings.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable
Databricks, Inc. v.ByteWeavr, LLC
· IPR2025-00716
Databricks successfully challenged U.S. Patent 8,275,827, leading the PTAB to find all 14 challenged claims unpatentable based on anticipation by the Carter reference and obviousness over Carter and Pitzel.
patent
Intas Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. et al. v.Atossa Therapeutics, Inc.
· IPR2025-00799
Intas Pharmaceuticals and Atossa Therapeutics filed a joint request to keep their settlement agreement confidential under 35 U.S.C. §317 and to terminate the pending IPR on patent 11,261,151.
patent mixed - some claims cancelled, some upheld
Databricks, Inc. v.ByteWeavr, LLC
· IPR2025-00716
Databricks successfully challenged 15 claims of the ’827 patent, finding them obvious over the OceanStore system. Anticipation arguments failed, and the Board adopted broader claim constructions that still rendered the claims unpatentable.
patent terminated or settled
USAA Federal Savings Bank v.PACid Technologies, LLC
· IPR2025-00755
USAA Federal Savings Bank and PACid Technologies settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 11,070,530, leading to a joint motion that terminated the IPR proceeding before it was instituted.
patent
Intas Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. et al. v.Atossa Therapeutics, Inc.
· IPR2025-00799
Intas Pharmaceuticals challenges Atossa Therapeutics’ endoxifen patent in IPR 2025‑00799. The petitioner argues the Board correctly instituted the case and that the Patent Owner’s new arguments are unsupported. The response seeks denial of the Owner’s request for Director Review.
patent terminated or settled
USAA Federal Savings Bank v.PACid Technologies, LLC
· IPR2025-00755
USAA Federal Savings Bank and PACid Technologies have jointly moved to terminate IPR2025-00755 after resolving their dispute in district court, invoking 35 U.S.C. § 317(a).
patent instituted
Activision Blizzard, Inc. v.Milestone Entertainment, LLC
· IPR2025-00712
Milestone Entertainment files a post‑institution response to Activision Blizzard’s IPR petition, arguing that the Kelly reference fails to disclose claim limitations and that Walker is not prior art because the inventors conceived and diligently reduced the invention before Walker’s filing date.
patent
Inter IKEA Systems B.V. v.POINTWISE VENTURES, LLC
· IPR2025-00798
IKEA and Pointwise jointly filed a motion requesting that their settlement agreement in IPR2025-00798 be treated as business confidential information, invoking 35 U.S.C. § 317(b). The Board’s decision on the confidentiality request is pending.
patent terminated or settled
USAA Federal Savings Bank v.PACid Technologies, LLC
· IPR2025-00752
USAA Federal Savings Bank and PACid Technologies have resolved their dispute over U.S. Patent No. 10,044,689 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The district‑court case involving the same patent was also dismissed.
patent terminated or settled
Inter IKEA Systems B.V. v.POINTWISE VENTURES, LLC
· IPR2025-00798
Inter IKEA Systems and Pointwise Ventures jointly moved to terminate IPR2025-00798 after settling their dispute over U.S. Patent 8,471,812. The Board is asked to dismiss the proceeding per settlement and statutory provisions.
patent terminated or settled
Intel Corporation v.Advanced Cluster Systems, Inc.
· IPR2025-00795
NVIDIA and Advanced Cluster Systems settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 8,676,877 B2 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The PTAB granted the motion, ending the proceeding without a merits decision.
patent terminated or settled
USAA Federal Savings Bank v.PACid Technologies, LLC
· IPR2025-00752
USAA Federal Savings Bank and PACid Technologies settled their IPR dispute before trial, resulting in a Board‑ordered termination of IPR2025-00752 covering patent 10,044,689.
patent
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al. v.iCashe, Inc.
· IPR2025-00644
Samsung has filed an IPR petition challenging iCashe’s U.S. Patent 9,208,423 covering mobile‑phone magnetic‑stripe emulation. Expert Henry Dreifus argues the claims are obvious over prior art Doughty, Bursch, and Fox. The petition is pending before the PTAB.
patent terminated or settled
Intel Corporation v.Advanced Cluster Systems, Inc.
· IPR2025-00794
NVIDIA and Advanced Cluster Systems settled their dispute, leading the PTAB to terminate the inter partes review of patent 8,140,612 B2.
patent
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al. v.iCashe, Inc.
· IPR2025-00645
Samsung has filed an IPR petition challenging iCashe’s U.S. Patent 11,270,174 covering mobile‑phone magnetic‑stripe emulation. Expert Henry Dreifus argues the claims are obvious over a combination of prior‑art references such as Doughty, Abe, and others.
patent
Activision Blizzard, Inc. v.Milestone Entertainment, LLC
· IPR2025-00708
Milestone Entertainment files a response to Activision Blizzard’s IPR petition, arguing that the cited Kelly and Walker references do not anticipate or render obvious any of the 20 challenged claims of its 8,529,336 gaming patent.
patent terminated or settled
Alpinestars S.p.A et al. v.Dainese S.p.A.
· IPR2025-00750
Alpinestars and Dainese have executed a settlement that ends all pending cross‑border patent disputes over airbag technology for motorcyclists. The agreement includes dismissal of lawsuits, withdrawal of oppositions, and a mutual non‑challenge pledge.
