US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 53 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent · Aug 13, 2025
Netskope, Inc. v.K.Mizra LLC
· IPR2025-01115
Netskope has filed a petition to institute an IPR against K.Mizra’s 8,234,705 patent, asserting that its network‑quarantine claims are obvious over three prior‑art references.
patent · Aug 13, 2025
GUANGZHOU EKO TRADING DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD et al. v.Nine Stars Group (U.S.A.) Inc. et al.
· IPR2025-01369
EKO petitions the PTAB to invalidate claims 1‑12 of Nine Stars’ ’796 patent covering a power‑saving, automatically opening trash bin. The petition relies on obviousness over Chinese references Zheng and Wang, asserting that the three‑state sensor control and sensor placement are well‑known.
patent instituted · Aug 13, 2025
GUANGZHOU EKO TRADING DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD et al. v.Nine Stars Group (U.S.A.) Inc. et al.
· IPR2025-01369
The USPTO granted institution for IPR2025-01369 after reviewing the merits, finding that the petitioner had a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.
patent · Aug 12, 2025
Ford Motor Company v.AutoConnect Holdings LLC
· IPR2026-00173
Ford Motor Company has filed an IPR petition challenging AutoConnect’s U.S. Patent 9,173,100 covering vehicle network security. The petition argues lack of priority support and obviousness over four prior‑art references. Ford seeks institution and a finding that the claims are unpatentable.
patent · Aug 10, 2025
Resonac Hard Disk Corporation et al. v.MR TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
· IPR2026-00016
Exhibit 1042 presents aggregate PTAB IPR statistics for hard‑disk patents, noting a 100% institution rate across 4,148 trials. Twenty percent of those trials produced mixed claim findings, while the majority favored the petitioner.
patent terminated or settled · Aug 10, 2025
Nintendo Co., Ltd. et al. v.Malikie Innovations Ltd.
· IPR2026-00003
Nintendo and Malikie Innovations settled their IPR dispute over patent 7,529,305 before trial. The Board granted the joint motion to terminate, dismissing the petitions.
patent terminated or settled · Aug 10, 2025
Nintendo Co., Ltd. et al. v.Malikie Innovations Ltd.
· IPR2026-00004
Nintendo and Malikie Innovations settled their IPR dispute over patent 8,115,731 B2, leading the Board to dismiss the petition and terminate the proceeding before trial.
patent terminated or settled · Aug 10, 2025
Nintendo Co., Ltd. et al. v.Malikie Innovations Ltd.
· IPR2026-00005
Nintendo and Malikie Innovations settled their IPR dispute over patent 8,545,247 B2 before trial. The Board granted the joint motion to terminate, dismissing the petitions.
patent · Aug 10, 2025
Resonac Hard Disk Corporation et al. v.MR TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
· IPR2026-00014
Exhibit 1042 provides statistical insight into PTAB trial outcomes for hard‑disk patents, highlighting a high institution rate and a strong petitioner win record across §102 and §103 grounds.
patent terminated or settled · Aug 10, 2025
Nintendo Co., Ltd. et al. v.Malikie Innovations Ltd.
· IPR2026-00006
Nintendo and Malikie Innovations settled their IPR dispute, leading the Board to dismiss the petitions and terminate the proceedings.
patent · Aug 10, 2025
Resonac Hard Disk Corporation et al. v.MR TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
· IPR2026-00015
An exhibit summarizing PTAB IPR outcomes shows that all 4,148 trials were instituted, with 20% yielding mixed claim findings under §103, and 24% under §102 for a subset of 1,190 trials.
patent · Aug 10, 2025
Resonac Hard Disk Corporation et al. v.MR TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
· IPR2026-00014
Resonac has filed an IPR petition challenging 15 claims of MR Technologies' 9,928,864 patent covering multilayer perpendicular magnetic recording media, asserting that the claims are obvious over Takenoiri and other prior art.
patent · Aug 10, 2025
Nintendo Co., Ltd. et al. v.Malikie Innovations Ltd.
· IPR2026-00003
Nintendo has filed an IPR petition challenging Malikie's ’305 patent covering space‑time coding, asserting that claims 1‑3 and 6 are anticipated or obvious over several earlier patents. The petition argues no secondary considerations exist and that discretionary denial is unwarranted.
patent · Aug 10, 2025
Fortinet, Inc. v.Netskope, Inc.
· IPR2026-00031
Fortinet has filed an IPR petition challenging Netskope’s U.S. Patent 8,635,697 covering network‑based malware detection and OS fingerprinting. The petition asserts obviousness under 35 U.S.C. §103 by combining three prior‑art references. The case is pending institution.
patent · Aug 10, 2025
Resonac Hard Disk Corporation et al. v.MR TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
· IPR2026-00015
Resonac files an IPR petition challenging MR Technologies' 11,138,997 patent covering perpendicular magnetic recording media. The petition asserts obviousness over Takenoiri (and Li for certain claims) and seeks cancellation of claims 1‑2, 4‑7, and 9.
patent · Aug 10, 2025
Nintendo Co., Ltd. et al. v.Malikie Innovations Ltd.
· IPR2026-00005
Nintendo has filed an IPR petition challenging eight claims of Malikie Innovations’ dock patent, arguing they are obvious over the earlier Tsutsui Japanese application. The petition includes a technical expert declaration and asserts no discretionary denial applies.
patent · Aug 10, 2025
Nintendo Co., Ltd. et al. v.Malikie Innovations Ltd.
· IPR2026-00006
Nintendo has filed an IPR petition challenging Malikie Innovations' 8,610,397 battery‑charger patent. The petition alleges obviousness over several Japanese and U.S. references and argues that discretionary denial is unwarranted.
patent · Aug 10, 2025
Resonac Hard Disk Corporation et al. v.MR TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
· IPR2026-00016
Resonac has filed an IPR petition against MR Technologies' 12,020,734 patent covering perpendicular magnetic recording media, asserting that the claims are obvious over Takenoiri, Fullerton, and Shen references.
patent · Aug 10, 2025
Nintendo Co., Ltd. et al. v.Malikie Innovations Ltd.
· IPR2026-00004
Nintendo has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate six claims of Malikie Innovations' handheld directional‑input patent, arguing obviousness over a suite of prior‑art references.
patent · Aug 9, 2025
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.Dynamic Mesh Networks, Inc.
· IPR2025-01523
Dynamic Mesh Networks seeks a discretionary denial of Cisco’s IPR petition covering 21 claims of a 2008 wireless‑mesh patent, arguing settled expectations, weak invalidity grounds, and unfavorable Fintiv factors.
patent · Aug 9, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.SnapAid Ltd.
· PGR2025-00083
Samsung Electronics has filed a post‑grant review petition seeking cancellation of all twelve claims of SnapAid’s ’452 patent covering real‑time image‑quality assessment. The challenger alleges obviousness, indefiniteness, lack of written description, and patent‑ineligible subject matter.
patent · Aug 9, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.One-E-Way, Inc.
· IPR2025-01516
Samsung has filed an IPR petition challenging all 20 claims of One‑E‑Way’s wireless audio patent, asserting obviousness over multiple prior‑art references and a broken priority chain.
patent · Aug 9, 2025
Clean Chemistry, Inc. v.Enviro Tech Chemical Services, Inc. et al.
· IPR2025-01472
Clean Chemistry has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate all 22 claims of Enviro Tech’s peracetic acid generation patent, alleging obviousness over Okano and, in combination, Withenshaw and Oringer.
patent · Aug 9, 2025
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.Dynamic Mesh Networks, Inc.
· IPR2025-01523
Cisco has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate all 21 claims of Dynamic Mesh Networks' ’952 patent, asserting that the claims are obvious over prior‑art such as Ganz, Srikrishna, Bishop and the IEEE 802.11 standard.
