US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 4 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent · Mar 4, 2026
Apple Inc. v.IngenioSpec, LLC
· IPR2026-00331
Apple has filed an IPR petition challenging 92 claims of IngenioSpec’s ’355 patent covering wearable audio devices. The petition argues the claims are obvious over six prior‑art references and seeks cancellation of all challenged claims.
patent · Mar 4, 2026
Microsoft Corporation v.Qomplx LLC
· IPR2026-00326
Microsoft has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate 13 claims of Qomplx’s 2025 patent on graph‑based cyber‑attack detection, asserting obviousness over two earlier publications. The petition argues that each claim element is fully disclosed in Brezinski and Crabtree, and no evidence of non‑obviousness is offered.
patent · Mar 4, 2026
Apple Inc. v.IngenioSpec, LLC
· IPR2026-00332
Apple has filed an IPR petition targeting claim 55 of IngenioSpec’s ’355 patent covering wearable audio devices. The petition asserts the claim is obvious over prior‑art hearing‑aid patents and a textbook, and asks the Board to institute review and cancel the claim.
patent · Mar 3, 2026
Paragon 28, Inc. v.Treace Medical Concepts, Inc.
· PGR2026-00031
Paragon 28 seeks to invalidate Treace’s 12,349,941 bunion‑correction patent, alleging lack of written description, enablement, and obviousness over prior surgical methods and devices. The petition requests cancellation of all 27 claims.
patent · Mar 2, 2026
FanDuel, Inc. et al. v.WinView IP Holdings, LLC
· IPR2026-00245
FanDuel has petitioned the PTAB to invalidate WinView’s ‘349 patent covering synchronized live‑sports gaming, asserting that a 1998 European filing anticipates all challenged claims.
patent · Mar 2, 2026
Toyota Motor Corporation et al. v.BUNKER HILL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
· IPR2026-00250
Toyota has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate Bunker Hill’s U.S. Patent 10,549,648 covering hybrid‑electric vehicle propulsion. The challenger alleges anticipation and obviousness over three prior‑art references and requests cancellation of all 20 claims.
patent · Feb 28, 2026
Amazon.com Services LLC et al. v.Smart Speaker LLC
· IPR2026-00276
Amazon has filed an IPR petition challenging Smart Speaker’s ’721 smart‑home patent, asserting that all asserted claims are obvious over a suite of prior‑art references.
patent terminated or settled · Feb 27, 2026
Fifth Third Bank, National Association v.United Services Automobile Association
· IPR2026-00279
USAA and Regions Bank have reached a settlement in principle and jointly moved to stay all case deadlines while finalizing the agreement. The motion seeks a 14‑day stay to allow filing of dismissal papers.
patent · Feb 27, 2026
Fifth Third Bank, National Association v.United Services Automobile Association
· IPR2026-00277
USAA and Regions Bank have reached a settlement in principle and jointly filed a motion to stay all deadlines while finalizing the agreement. The motion seeks a 14‑day stay to file dismissal papers.
patent · Feb 27, 2026
Fifth Third Bank, National Association v.United Services Automobile Association
· IPR2026-00279
Fifth Third Bank has filed a petition to have the PTAB institute an IPR against USAA’s 12,159,310 patent covering mobile check‑deposit methods, asserting that all 16 claims are obvious over a body of prior art.
patent · Feb 27, 2026
Okta, Inc. et al. v.Thales DIS France SAS
· IPR2026-00278
Okta has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all ten claims of Thales' ’982 patent covering biometric hash‑based authentication. The petition alleges obviousness over a combination of Starner, Leskovec, Shaashua, and Bowman references.
patent · Feb 27, 2026
Fifth Third Bank, National Association v.United Services Automobile Association
· IPR2026-00277
Fifth Third Bank has filed a petition to institute an IPR against US Patent 12,211,095 covering mobile check‑deposit technology. The petition alleges that all 30 claims are obvious over a combination of earlier mobile imaging references. It seeks cancellation of the entire patent.
patent · Feb 26, 2026
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. et al. v.Genzyme Corporation et al.
· IPR2026-00270
Sarepta filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate Genzyme’s ’313 AAV detection patent. The petition asserts that all 27 claims are obvious in view of earlier publications on LC‑MS and RP‑HPLC analysis of viral proteins. No secondary considerations are believed to overcome the obviousness argument.
patent · Feb 24, 2026
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.Vusura Technology LLC
· IPR2026-00255
Cisco has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate claims 1‑25 of Vusura’s ’303 patent, which covers multimedia content presentation during telephone calls. The challenger relies on the 2007 Roundtree publication to argue obviousness under §103.
patent · Feb 20, 2026
Albaugh, LLC v.BASF SE et al.
· PGR2026-00026
Albaugh, LLC petitions the PTAB to invalidate claims 1‑6 of BASF’s 2025 glufosinate formulation patent, asserting anticipation by the Long patent and obviousness over Long alone or combined with synthesis references.
patent · Feb 20, 2026
Google LLC v.K.Mizra LLC
· IPR2026-00254
Google has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate all 20 claims of K.Mizra's 2012 wireless networking patent, arguing anticipation and obviousness over Yoon, Andric, and Budampati references.
patent · Feb 20, 2026
SAGEMCOM BROADBAND SAS v.Entropic Communications, LLC
· IPR2026-00263
Sagemcom Broadband petitions the PTAB to invalidate all 20 claims of Entropic Communications’ ’275 patent, asserting anticipation and obviousness over Zhang and related prior art.
patent · Feb 20, 2026
CRRC Meishan Co. Ltd. et al. v.Howmet Aerospace Inc.
· IPR2026-00268
CRRC Meishan has filed an IPR petition challenging all 20 claims of Howmet Aerospace’s blind‑fastener patent, asserting anticipation and obviousness over multiple prior‑art references including Corbett 2018, Corbett 1981, Hurd, Sadri, and the BobTail catalog.
patent · Feb 20, 2026
Medtronic, Inc. v.Moskowitz Family LLC
· IPR2026-00265
Medtronic has filed a petition for inter partes review of Moskowitz Family’s U.S. Patent 10,064,738 covering spinal intervertebral fusion devices. The challenger alleges that the parent application Moskowitz 440, together with Waugh (and Michelson 019), makes the asserted claims obvious under 35 U.S.C. §103. The petition seeks cancellation of 16 claims.
patent · Feb 20, 2026
IPG Photonics Corporation v.Trumpf Laser- Und Systemtechnik GMBH
· IPR2026-00251
IPG Photonics has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 20 claims of TRUMPF’s ’054 laser‑fiber patent, alleging obviousness over a suite of prior‑art fiber‑laser references. The petition outlines four grounds covering the full claim set.
patent · Feb 18, 2026
SEG Solar, Inc. et al. v.--
· IPR2026-00230
SEG Solar and affiliated entities have filed an IPR petition challenging Jinko's 2023 solar‑cell patent, asserting that 18 claims are obvious over multiple Chinese patents and academic papers. The petition lays out detailed claim‑by‑claim mappings to prior art and seeks cancellation under § 318(b).
patent · Feb 18, 2026
X Corp., v.Search & Share Technologies, LLC
· IPR2026-00244
X Corp. has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 14 claims of the ’952 patent, alleging anticipation and obviousness over the Malla, Walther, and Smadja references under §§ 102 and 103.
patent · Feb 17, 2026
Google LLC v.Valtrus Innovation Limited et al.
· IPR2026-00262
Google petitions the PTAB to invalidate claims 14‑21 and 24‑28 of U.S. Patent 7,057,509, asserting anticipation and obviousness over multiple prior‑art systems for object monitoring and tracking.
patent · Feb 13, 2026
Hyundai Motor America, Inc. v.Germ Dome Industries LLC
· PGR2026-00030
Hyundai Motor America has filed a post‑grant review petition seeking cancellation of all twenty claims of Germ Dome’s UV sanitizing patent, alleging anticipation by a 2003 Japanese patent and obviousness over that reference alone and in combination with a later U.S. application. The petition relies on extensive claim‑by‑claim comparisons to prior art.
