US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 351 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent · Feb 7, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-00920
Amazon and Nokia settled their dispute over patent 8,077,991, leading the USPTO to dismiss the Director Review request as moot and return the case to the Board.
patent terminated or settled · Feb 7, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-00921
Amazon and Nokia have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 8,077,991 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review, citing statutory authority and public‑policy benefits.
patent denied · Feb 7, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-00920
Amazon’s request to overturn Nokia’s video‑compression patent was denied after the Board found the petitioners’ claim constructions erroneous and unsupported by expert testimony.
patent terminated or settled · Feb 7, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-00921
Amazon and Nokia jointly moved to terminate four inter partes reviews after reaching a settlement. The Board granted the termination and ordered the settlement documents to be kept confidential.
patent denied · Feb 7, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-00920
The PTAB denied institution of Amazon’s IPR against Nokia’s wireless patent and dismissed the parties’ joint motion to terminate as moot. The Board granted in part a request to keep the settlement agreement confidential.
patent null · Feb 7, 2024
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-01151
Dyson challenges U.S. Patent No. 11,910,984 in a PTAB Petition, arguing that the claims covering handheld vacuum cleaners are obvious. The petition relies heavily on combining various prior art references, including Dyson's own publications and patents.
patent · Feb 7, 2024
Samsung Display Co., Ltd. et al. v.Pictiva Displays International Limited et al.
· IPR2024-01094
Samsung Display Co., Ltd. has filed a Petition challenging U.S. Patent No. 8,558,223 held by Pictiva Displays International Ltd. The challenge asserts that the patent claims relating to organic electronic components are obvious over prior art references Werner and Ma. This action targets core technology in the high-value Organic Light-Emitting Diode (OLED) market.
patent instituted · Feb 7, 2024
Illumina, Inc. v.Molecular Loop Biosciences, Inc.
· IPR2024-00965
Illumina filed an Inter Partes Review petition challenging Molecular Loop Biosciences' patents covering dual-indexing in Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS). The petitioner argued the claims were anticipated or obvious over prior art references like Gloor and Parameswaran. The PTAB decided to institute the IPR because the Examiner failed to consider relevant prior art during prosecution.
patent null · Feb 7, 2024
Illumina, Inc. v.Molecular Loop Biosciences, Inc.
· IPR2024-00964
Illumina Inc. has filed a petition challenging eight claims related to Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) technology at the PTAB. The core argument is that the challenged methods are obvious over combinations of prior art, specifically involving dual-indexing techniques and sequencing platform substitutions. This challenge targets fundamental aspects of NGS methodology.
patent null · Feb 7, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-00921
Amazon filed an IPR challenging Nokia Technologies Oy's patents related to hybrid video coding and prediction error encoding. The petition argues that the challenged claims are obvious over combinations of prior art references, specifically Koga, Lin, and Narroschke. Petitioners assert these combinations teach predictable improvements in codec implementation.
patent · Feb 7, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-00920
Amazon challenged Nokia's hybrid video coding patents at the PTAB, arguing they are obvious combinations of known techniques found in Koga, Lin, and Narroschke. The petition focuses heavily on how combining transform and spatial domain methods is predictable within modern compression standards.
patent instituted · Feb 7, 2024
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-01151
Dyson successfully petitioned to invalidate Omachron's patent (11910984) covering surface cleaning apparatus. The PTAB institution decision found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on multiple grounds, including obviousness based on Dimbylow and Howes.
patent instituted · Feb 7, 2024
Samsung Display Co., Ltd. et al. v.Pictiva Displays International Limited et al.
· IPR2024-01094
Samsung Display Co., Ltd. successfully had its IPR petition instituted against Pictiva Displays International Limited regarding OLED technology claims. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on Claim 1 based on obviousness over prior art 'Ma'.
patent instituted · Feb 7, 2024
Illumina, Inc. v.Molecular Loop Biosciences, Inc.
· IPR2024-00965
Illumina successfully secured the institution of Inter Partes Review against Molecular Loop Biosciences' patent, challenging claims 1-6 based on anticipation by Gloor and obviousness over multiple prior art references.
patent instituted · Feb 7, 2024
Illumina, Inc. v.Molecular Loop Biosciences, Inc.
· IPR2024-00964
Illumina successfully petitioned the PTAB to institute an IPR against Molecular Loop Biosciences regarding next-generation sequencing technology. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of obviousness over Parameswaran and Gloor, allowing the case to proceed to trial.
patent instituted · Feb 7, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-00921
Amazon successfully challenged Nokia's video compression patent (8077991) in an IPR proceeding based on obviousness and anticipation grounds. The PTAB found a reasonable likelihood that Amazon would prevail, leading to the institution of trial on all contested claims.
patent denied · Feb 7, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-00920
Amazon's IPR petition against Nokia regarding video coding methods was denied by the PTAB, finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate obviousness over prior art references like Koga and Lin. The Board relied on claim construction distinguishing 'spatial samples' from 'decoded spatial information.'
patent Final Written Decision · Feb 7, 2024
Samsung Display Co., Ltd. et al. v.Pictiva Displays International Limited et al.
· IPR2024-01094
The PTAB found several claims of the '223 patent unpatentable over prior art reference Ma based on obviousness. Specifically, Claims 1, 2, 6, and 8-14 were invalidated by the Board's determination that Ma disclosed relevant features.
patent final · Feb 7, 2024
Illumina, Inc. v.Molecular Loop Biosciences, Inc.
· IPR2024-00965
The PTAB found all six challenged claims unpatentable due to anticipation and obviousness. The Board determined that the prior art reference Gloor anticipates every claim (1-6). Furthermore, combinations of Parameswaran with other references rendered the remaining claims obvious.
patent final · Feb 7, 2024
Illumina, Inc. v.Molecular Loop Biosciences, Inc.
· IPR2024-00964
The PTAB issued a Final Written Decision rejecting the Petitioner's challenge to claims 1-8 of U.S. Patent No. 11041852. The Board adopted the Patent Owner’s narrow construction of 'cross-over error,' limiting it specifically to errors during cluster amplification, and found no anticipation or obviousness over cited prior art.
patent · Feb 5, 2024
smaXtec Inc. et al. v.ST Reproductive Technologies, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-00875
SMAXTEC and its affiliate contest ST Reproductive Technologies' Director Review request, defending the Board’s obviousness findings for several claims of a livestock health monitoring patent and offering limited remand only to clarify claim 18 and reconcile claims 6, 19, and 20.
patent terminated or settled · Feb 5, 2024
Capital One, National Association v.--
· IPR2024-00878
Capital One and Implicit, LLC settled their IPR dispute over a payment‑card fraud patent, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding before a trial was instituted.
patent · Feb 5, 2024
Capital One, National Association v.--
· IPR2024-00878
Capital One filed an unopposed motion to terminate IPR 2024-00878 and to keep the settlement with Implicit, LLC confidential under statutory authority. The Board is asked to treat the settlement as business confidential information and end the proceeding.
patent · Feb 5, 2024
smaXtec Inc. et al. v.ST Reproductive Technologies, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-00875
ST Reproductive Technologies requests Director Review of the PTAB’s final decision that invalidated dependent claims 4, 6, and 18‑20 of its livestock‑monitoring patent. The owner alleges the Board misapplied prior‑art references and failed to consider claim‑specific arguments, seeking reversal or vacatur.
