US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 347 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent terminated or settled · Feb 12, 2024
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. v.WSOU Investments LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development
· IPR2025-00241
Cisco and WSOU Investments settled their IPR dispute over patent 8,441,721 before trial. The Board dismissed the petition on the parties' joint motion to terminate.
patent · Feb 12, 2024
Formycon AG v.Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
· IPR2025-00233
Formycon AG has petitioned the PTAB to invalidate 52 claims of Regeneron's anti‑VEGF ophthalmic formulation patent, arguing obviousness over prior‑art formulations and presentations. The petition also challenges any discretionary denial under §§ 314(a) and 325(d).
patent · Feb 12, 2024
Micron Technology, Inc. et al. v.Yangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd.
· IPR2025-00191
Micron has filed an IPR petition challenging all 20 claims of YMTC’s 3D NAND patent, arguing obviousness over Nishikawa, Lu, and Nishikawa2 references and asserting no discretionary denial factors.
patent · Feb 12, 2024
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. v.WSOU Investments LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development
· IPR2025-00241
Cisco has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate claims 1,2,4,6,19,21 of the ’721 Raman‑pump optimization patent, arguing they are obvious over Sugaya and, in combination, over Farmer. The petition stresses prompt filing and argues against discretionary denial.
patent denied · Feb 12, 2024
Formycon AG v.Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
· IPR2025-00233
The PTAB denied Formycon AG's IPR against Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., citing substantial overlap with parallel district court proceedings (MDL). The Board found that the interests of system efficiency were best served by denying institution.
patent instituted · Feb 12, 2024
Micron Technology, Inc. et al. v.Yangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd.
· IPR2025-00191
Micron Technology successfully challenged several claims in the NAND Flash patent, establishing a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on its obviousness grounds. The Board found that modifying TAC shapes and implementing dummy channels were simple advancements supported by prior art.
patent · Feb 10, 2024
Google LLC v.Metarail, Inc.
· IPR2024-01271
Google has filed a petition for rehearing after the PTAB denied institution of its IPR against Metarail’s ‘normalized variable data database’ patent. The petitioner contends the Board misread claim scope and that the Belanger‑Halevy combination satisfies the claimed mapping step.
patent · Feb 10, 2024
Google LLC v.Metarail, Inc.
· IPR2024-01270
Google has filed a petition for rehearing after the PTAB denied institution of its IPR against Metarail’s data‑mapping patent. The petitioner asserts the Board misread claim scope and the combination of Belanger and Halevy references.
patent · Feb 10, 2024
Google LLC v.Metarail, Inc.
· IPR2024-01272
Google has filed a petition for rehearing after the PTAB denied institution of its IPR against Metarail’s ’734 patent. The petitioner asserts the Board misread the claim scope by improperly tying it to a non‑limiting table example. Google seeks reversal so the trial can proceed.
patent · Feb 10, 2024
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al. v.Collision Communications, Inc.
· IPR2025-00011
Samsung Electronics filed an IPR petition challenging Collision Communications’ ’651 patent covering CDMA multi‑user detection, asserting that the claims are obvious over prior art such as Fuller, Reznik, Frank, and Zha.
patent · Feb 10, 2024
Lenovo (United States) Inc. et al. v.Universal Connectivity Technologies Inc.
· IPR2024-01481
Lenovo and its allies have filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of 26 claims of Universal Connectivity Technologies' serial‑communication patent, alleging obviousness over Auld, MPEG‑2, Shin and Hiroshima references.
patent · Feb 10, 2024
HP Inc. et al. v.Universal Connectivity Technologies Inc.
· IPR2024-01429
HP, Dell, and Lenovo have filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of 15 claims of U.S. Pat. 7,187,307, alleging anticipation and obviousness over prior‑art block‑encoding disclosures (Shin, Yusairi). The petition requests the Board to institute review and invalidate the claims.
patent · Feb 10, 2024
Apple Inc. v.Rally AG LLC
· IPR2024-01446
Apple has filed an IPR petition challenging all 19 claims of Rally’s email‑cloaking patent, asserting obviousness over three prior‑art references and seeking institution of the review.
patent · Feb 10, 2024
HP Inc. et al. v.Universal Connectivity Technologies Inc.
· IPR2024-01428
HP, Dell, and Lenovo have filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of Universal Connectivity’s packet‑preemption patent, arguing it is anticipated and obvious over earlier Banes and Calvignac disclosures.
patent instituted · Feb 10, 2024
Google LLC v.Metarail, Inc.
· IPR2024-01272
Google LLC petitioned the PTAB challenging Metarail's patent covering automated deep-link creation based on obviousness (103). The Board found that the petition showed a strong basis on the merits and decided to institute review of all 20 claims. This decision moves the dispute into the substantive examination phase at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
patent null · Feb 10, 2024
Google LLC v.Metarail, Inc.
· IPR2024-01271
Google LLC has challenged Metarail's deep-linking patent (10262342) at the PTAB, asserting that the claims are obvious.
patent instituted · Feb 10, 2024
Google LLC v.Metarail, Inc.
· IPR2024-01270
Google LLC has challenged Metarail's deep-linking patents in a PTAB petition, arguing that the claimed invention—a universal variable map for generating deep-linked ads—is obvious. The petitioner asserts that combining prior art references like Belanger and Halevy would have made the automation of mapping fields predictable to a Person Having Ordinary Skill in the Art.
patent · Feb 10, 2024
Google LLC v.Metarail, Inc.
· IPR2024-01269
Google LLC has filed an IPR petition challenging Metarail's '626 patent, arguing that its claims regarding parameter mapping and deep linking automation are obvious. The petitioner relies on combinations of prior art references, including Belanger, Halevy, and Reichardt, to establish obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
patent denied · Feb 10, 2024
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al. v.Collision Communications, Inc.
· IPR2025-00011
The PTAB denied Samsung's request to institute an IPR against Collision Communications, citing the Fintiv factors. The Board found that scheduling proximity and significant investment weighed heavily in favor of denying institution despite allegations of obviousness.
patent denied · Feb 10, 2024
Lenovo (United States) Inc. et al. v.Universal Connectivity Technologies Inc.
· IPR2024-01481
The PTAB denied institution for a petition challenging Patent No. 7,746,798 B2, citing both procedural factors and significant weaknesses in the merits. The denial was influenced by the proximity of an expected trial date in related litigation to the final decision timeline.
patent denied · Feb 10, 2024
Apple Inc. v.Rally AG LLC
· IPR2024-01446
Apple Inc.'s IPR petition against Rally AG LLC's ID cloaking patent was denied by the PTAB. The Board found insufficient evidence to overcome obviousness challenges based on prior art references Lee, Hardt, and Le Jouan.
patent denied · Feb 10, 2024
HP Inc. et al. v.Universal Connectivity Technologies Inc.
· IPR2024-01429
The PTAB denied the IPR petition filed by HP Inc. and others against Universal Connectivity Technologies Inc., citing that the petitioner's allegations of anticipation and obviousness were not 'particularly strong.' The decision also addressed discretionary denial under § 314(a) based on parallel district court litigation.
patent denied · Feb 10, 2024
HP Inc. et al. v.Universal Connectivity Technologies Inc.
· IPR2024-01428
The PTAB denied institution for an IPR petition concerning serial data transmission and symbol encoding (Patent No. 7154905). The Board found that while the petitioner raised obviousness arguments, the merits of the case were not sufficiently strong to overcome procedural hurdles.
patent denied · Feb 10, 2024
Google LLC v.Metarail, Inc.
· IPR2024-01272
The PTAB denied Google LLC's IPR challenge against Metarail, Inc.'s patent (10152734), finding no evidence of obviousness or anticipation. The Board concluded that the prior art failed to teach a specific 'universal variable mapper' necessary for the claims.
