US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 330 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent denied
Juniper Networks, Inc. v.Orckit Corporation
· IPR2024-00895
Juniper Networks' attempt to challenge Orckit's patent was denied by the PTAB. The Board cited General Plastic factors, finding that the claims were materially similar to those previously reviewed and Petitioner had prior knowledge of the asserted prior art.
patent instituted
BOTE, LLC v.STEAMBOAT PADDLESPORTS, LLC.
· IPR2024-00892
The PTAB granted institution of IPR for 20 claims covering inflatable paddle boards. The Board found a reasonable likelihood that the challenger, BOTE, LLC, would prevail on obviousness grounds over prior art references like Hoffmann and Hoge.
patent instituted
Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. et al. v.DexCom, Inc.
· IPR2024-00891
Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. successfully secured institutional status in an IPR against DexCom, Inc., regarding continuous glucose monitoring systems. The Board found sufficient evidence that prior art references anticipate or render obvious key claims related to transcutaneous sensors and drift profiles.
patent instituted
Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. et al. v.DexCom, Inc.
· IPR2024-00890
Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. successfully petitioned to institute IPR against DexCom, Inc.'s glucose monitoring patent (11020031). The Board found sufficient evidence for trial on 22 claims based on anticipation and obviousness over prior art from Zhang and Shin.
patent instituted
smaXtec Inc. et al. v.ST Reproductive Technologies, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-00885
The PTAB granted institution for the IPR challenge against a patent covering animal management systems using RFID technology. The Petitioner successfully argued that prior art references, including Trevarthen and Laitinen/Buchanan/Liao, provided sufficient motivation to combine elements of the challenged claims.
patent instituted
BOTE, LLC v.STEAMBOAT PADDLESPORTS, LLC
· IPR2024-00889
BOTE, LLC successfully petitioned to institute IPR against Twitch LLC regarding U.S. Patent No. 10,479,458 for inflatable paddle boards. The Board found a reasonable likelihood that the patent's claims would be obvious over prior art references.
patent denied
Voltage, LLC et al. v.Shoals Technologies Group, LLC
· IPR2024-00877
Voltage, LLC failed its IPR challenge against Shoals Technologies Group regarding photovoltaic connectors. The PTAB denied the petition, finding that the combination of prior art references lacked sufficient motivation to render the claims obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
patent instituted
smaXtec Inc. et al. v.ST Reproductive Technologies, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-00875
The PTAB has instituted an IPR proceeding challenging the validity of claims in patent 9844206, focusing on obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103). The Petitioner successfully demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of prevailing by presenting strong arguments regarding prior art combination and claim construction.
patent denied
Voltage, LLC et al. v.Shoals Technologies Group, LLC
· IPR2024-00876
Voltage, LLC's IPR petition against Shoals Technologies Group, LLC was denied by the PTAB, finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on any claim. The dispute centered on obviousness grounds (35 U.S.C. § 103) regarding solar power interconnection systems.
patent denied
Biofrontera AG et al. v.Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.
· IPR2024-00874
The PTAB denied an IPR challenge brought by Biofrontera AG against Sun Pharmaceutical Industries regarding photodynamic therapy illuminators. The Board found the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on obviousness grounds (103).
patent denied
Reed Semiconductor Corporation v.Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
· IPR2024-00871
The PTAB denied institution for Reed Semiconductor Corporation's IPR against Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., finding Petitioner failed to adequately map claims onto prior art references. The denial was based on insufficient explanation regarding specific functional limitations in the voltage converter technology.
patent denied
ENS Labs Ltd. v.Unstoppable Domains Inc.
· IPR2024-00872
ENS Labs Ltd.'s IPR challenge against Unstoppable Domains Inc. was denied by the PTAB, primarily because the petitioner failed to prove that key prior art documentation qualified as publicly accessible under 35 U.S.C. § 102. The Board found the evidence of public accessibility insufficient to support the obviousness grounds asserted across multiple claims.
patent instituted
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.XR COMMUNICATIONS LLC
· IPR2024-00868
The PTAB instituted trial in an IPR proceeding concerning MIMO/Beamforming antenna technology. The Board found sufficient evidence to suggest that several challenged claims are unpatentable over the prior art, specifically Trigui and Rudrapatna. This decision moves the dispute forward toward a full evidentiary hearing on obviousness grounds.
patent instituted
WIZ, Inc. v.Orca Security Ltd.
· IPR2024-00865
WIZ, Inc. successfully navigated the institution phase of an IPR against Orca Security Ltd., demonstrating a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on its obviousness claims (35 U.S.C. § 103). The Board preliminarily agreed with Wiz's claim construction arguments regarding snapshot analysis and API usage based on prior art references.
patent instituted
WIZ, Inc. v.Orca Security Ltd.
· IPR2024-00864
WIZ, Inc. successfully convinced the PTAB to institute an IPR against Orca Security Ltd.'s patent covering virtualization and cloud security. The Board found sufficient evidence that the combination of prior art references would render the claims obvious, leading to a trial.
patent instituted
Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. et al. v.DexCom, Inc.
· IPR2024-00861
Abbott Diabetes Care successfully petitioned to institute IPR proceedings against DexCom regarding claims related to remote patient monitoring and glucose management. The PTAB found sufficient evidence that the petitioner met its burden of demonstrating a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on multiple grounds (102 and 103).
patent instituted
WIZ, Inc. v.Orca Security Ltd.
· IPR2024-00863
WIZ, Inc. successfully convinced the PTAB to institute its IPR against Orca Security Ltd.'s patent (11663031) in cybersecurity/cloud computing. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of success on multiple grounds of obviousness (103), particularly regarding the combination of prior art references Veselov and Price.
patent instituted
Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. et al. v.DexCom, Inc.
· IPR2024-00859
Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. successfully petitioned to institute IPR proceedings against DexCom, Inc.'s patent (11510625) regarding transcutaneous analyte measurement systems. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on unpatentability based on alleged anticipation by prior art reference Pace for at least Claim 1.
patent denied
Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. et al. v.DexCom, Inc.
· IPR2024-00860
The PTAB denied Abbott's second IPR petition against DexCom's '625 patent. The Board ruled that the petitioner failed to demonstrate any material difference in grounds compared to a previously instituted review.
patent instituted
Google LLC et al. v.EyesMatch Ltd.
· IPR2024-00856
Google LLC et al. successfully petitioned for institution of IPR against EyesMatch Ltd.'s patent 8982109, challenging claims based on obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103). The Board declined to deny institution despite arguments regarding parallel district court litigation.
patent instituted
Trove Brands, LLC et al. v.Vista Outdoor Operations LLC
· IPR2024-00858
The PTAB granted institution of IPR for Trove Brands against CamelBak's patent 8905252, finding that the petitioner demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of proving unpatentability over Samartgis and Leoncavallo.
patent denied
Samsung Display Co., Ltd. et al. v.Pictiva Displays International Ltd.
· IPR2024-00855
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.'s IPR petition against Pictiva Displays International Ltd. was denied by the PTAB. The Board found that the petition lacked compelling merits and determined the dispute was better suited for District Court resolution due to complex claim construction issues.
patent instituted
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00854
Dyson Technology Limited successfully convinced the PTAB to institute trial against Omachron Intellectual Property regarding patent 10478030, which covers surface cleaning apparatus. The Board found sufficient evidence of anticipation and obviousness across multiple claims (1-13) based on prior art references including Peter, Neroni, and Butler.
patent instituted
Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. et al. v.DexCom, Inc.
· IPR2024-00853
Abbott Diabetes Care successfully petitioned to institute IPR proceedings against DexCom for patent infringement related to remote patient monitoring and glucose technology. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on multiple grounds, specifically finding that prior art combinations rendered key claims obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
