US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 328 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent denied
Cambridge Mobile Telematics, Inc. v.Sfara, Inc.
· IPR2024-00952
The PTAB denied institution of IPR for Cambridge Mobile Telematics against Sfara, citing Petitioner's failure to provide a proper claim construction under 37 C.F.R. § 42.104(b)(3). Additionally, the Board found that key 'component' terms functioned as means-plus-function limitations lacking cognizable structure in the patent specification.
patent instituted
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00950
Dyson Technology Limited successfully instituted an IPR against Omachron Intellectual Property Inc.'s patent (10080472) covering vacuum cleaner technology. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on all 25 challenged claims based on obviousness (§ 103).
patent instituted
Ascend Elements, Inc. v.Duesenfeld GmbH
· IPR2024-00948
Ascend Elements, Inc. successfully convinced the PTAB to institute trial in its IPR against Duesenfeld GmbH regarding battery recycling technology. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one ground of obviousness over multiple prior art references.
patent denied
Siemens Mobility, Inc. et al. v.Metrom Rail, LLC
· IPR2024-00947
Siemens Mobility's IPR challenge against Metrom Rail's rail vehicle control patent was denied by the PTAB. The Board found that the arguments presented were substantially similar to those previously raised during prosecution, leading to a discretionary denial under 35 U.S.C. § 325(d).
patent denied
Siemens Mobility, Inc. et al. v.Metrom Rail, LLC
· IPR2024-00947
The PTAB denied a request to reverse the denial of institution for IPR2024-00947, finding that Kane was not 'previously presented art' and that it was substantially similar to Knott.
patent denied
Google LLC et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-00945
Google's attempt to invalidate a wireless traffic control patent was denied by the PTAB, as the petitioner failed to meet the 'reasonable likelihood' standard for obviousness. The Board found that the prior art did not sufficiently teach or suggest the specific differential traffic policies claimed in the patent.
patent denied
Google LLC et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-00944
Google's IPR challenge against Headwater Research failed at the institution stage, with the PTAB denying the petition. The Board found that Google did not demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on unpatentability over prior art Rao and 6 US 8,028,060 B1 for claims 79 and 83.
patent instituted
Google LLC et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-00942
Google LLC et al. successfully secured institution in an IPR against Headwater Research LLC's '541 patent regarding device-assisted services for network capacity control. The Board found sufficient evidence that the remaining claims are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103, based on prior art including Rao.
patent instituted
Google LLC et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-00943
Google LLC successfully secured institution in its IPR against Headwater Research LLC regarding wireless network capacity management claims. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on multiple claims based on obviousness over prior art references Rao and Fadell.
patent denied
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00941
The PTAB denied Aylo Freesites Ltd's petition to challenge DISH Technologies L.L.C.'s streaming patent (11991234), citing the unnecessary burden created by a concurrent, comprehensive petition.
patent denied
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00940
The Director vacated the Final Written Decision and dismissed the IPR petition filed by Aylo Freesites Ltd against DISH Technologies L.L.C., finding that the petition was time-barred after correcting its list of Real Parties in Interest.
patent instituted
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00940
Aylo Freesites Ltd successfully convinced the PTAB to institute proceedings against DISH Technologies L.L.C., arguing that key adaptive streaming claims are obvious over prior art, specifically WO 02/49343 A1. The Board found a material error in the Office's review of the evidence, allowing the IPR to proceed to trial.
patent instituted
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00938
Dyson successfully had its patent (No. 11,389,038 B2) instituted in an IPR against Omachron Intellectual Property Inc., overcoming initial challenges regarding obviousness. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of success for Dyson across all asserted claims (1-15), moving the dispute toward trial.
patent denied
Duration Media v.Rich Media Club LLC
· IPR2024-00937
The PTAB denied the institution of Inter Partes Review (IPR) against Rich Media Club LLC's advertising patent. The Board found that Petitioner Duration Media lacked a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on grounds of obviousness (103).
patent instituted
Texas Instruments Incorporated v.ParkerVision, Inc.
· IPR2024-00936
Texas Instruments (Petitioner) successfully secured institution of its Inter Partes Review petition against ParkerVision's patent (9118528). The Board found a reasonable likelihood of obviousness over combinations including Tayloe, TI Datasheet, and Macnally.
patent instituted
Texas Instruments Incorporated v.ParkerVision, Inc.
· IPR2024-00935
Texas Instruments Incorporated successfully challenged ParkerVision's patent claims regarding RF signal processing via an IPR petition. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one claim, leading to the institution of the case for substantive analysis.
patent instituted
Texas Instruments Incorporated v.ParkerVision, Inc.
· IPR2024-00934
Texas Instruments (TI) successfully secured the institution of its IPR against ParkerVision, Inc., establishing a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on obviousness grounds. The Board found that TI's evidence was sufficient at this stage to overcome arguments regarding inherency and simulation data reliability.
patent instituted
FormFactor, Inc. v.Technoprobe S.p.A.
· IPR2024-00933
FormFactor challenges Technoprobe's wafer probing patent (11035885) before the PTAB, arguing anticipation and obviousness. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on multiple grounds, instituting the IPR proceeding.
patent instituted
Abbott Laboratories v.Newtonoid Technologies, LLC
· IPR2024-00932
Abbott Laboratories challenged Newtonoid Technologies' '818 patent, asserting obviousness over prior art references like Prusik and Vaillant. The PTAB issued an institution decision finding a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on all 20 challenged claims.
patent denied
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Oura Health Oy et al.
· IPR2024-00930
The PTAB denied Samsung's IPR petition against Oura Health because the patent owner had statutorily disclaimed all challenged claims.
patent denied
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Oura Health Oy et al.
· IPR2024-00929
The PTAB denied institution of an IPR filed by Samsung against Oura Health because the patent owner had formally disclaimed all 12 challenged claims.
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Oura Health Oy et al.
· IPR2024-00928
The PTAB granted institution of IPR for Samsung against Oura Health regarding the 'Wearable Computing Device' patent (9582034). The Board found a reasonable likelihood that Samsung would prevail on grounds of obviousness over LeBoeuf.
patent instituted
Sony Corporation v.Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC
· IPR2024-00925
Sony Corporation successfully secured institution in its IPR challenge against Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC regarding digital image processing claims. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability over prior art, moving the case to the merits phase.
patent instituted
Sony Corporation v.Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC
· IPR2024-00924
Sony Corporation successfully moved forward with its IPR challenge against Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC, as the PTAB declined to deny institution despite arguments regarding parallel district court litigation. The Board found sufficient merit in the petition, focusing on whether prior art (Watanabe) renders key digital imaging claims obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
