US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 320 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent instituted
Pascal Technologies v.Cambridge Enterprise Limited et al.
· IPR2024-01235
Pascal Technologies successfully secured institution of its Inter Partes Review (IPR) against the '656 patent, challenging claims related to barocaloric cooling agents. The Board adopted a broad interpretation of 'organic material,' supporting the Petitioner's argument that the claimed invention is unpatentable over prior art references like Mañosa and Patel.
patent denied
Arista Networks, Inc. v.Orckit Corporation
· IPR2024-01237
The PTAB denied Arista Networks' petition to review Orckit Corporation's patent (7545740) because the arguments and prior art were substantially identical to those previously presented in related IPR proceedings.
patent instituted
Thermaltake Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v.Chen, Chien-Hao et al.
· IPR2024-01230
The PTAB instituted the IPR, finding a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability for at least one claim based on obviousness. The Board specifically found evidence supporting Claim 1 over Lai and Hasegawa, while also noting inconclusive findings regarding Tsuji/Huang combinations.
patent denied
Charter Communications, Inc. et al. v.Touchstream Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2024-01232
The PTAB denied Charter Communications' IPR petition against Touchstream Technologies, citing failure to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on unpatentability grounds and procedural bar under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b). The Board also construed key terms like 'first format' as distinct from 'second format.'
patent denied
POSCO Future M Co., Ltd. v.CAMX Power LLC
· IPR2024-01229
POSCO Future M Co., Ltd.'s IPR challenge against CAMX Power LLC's lithium-ion battery patent was denied by the PTAB. The Board found Petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on grounds of anticipation or obviousness.
patent instituted
CommScope Technologies LLC et al. v.Belden Canada ULC et al.
· IPR2024-01228
CommScope Technologies LLC successfully convinced the PTAB that U.S. Patent No. 11,656,422 B2 is likely unpatentable over prior art references Fukui and Sedor. The Board instituted the IPR on all 47 challenged claims based on grounds of anticipation and obviousness.
patent instituted
CommScope Technologies LLC et al. v.Belden Canada ULC et al.
· IPR2024-01227
CommScope Technologies LLC successfully petitioned to challenge U.S. Patent No. 11,435,542 B2 before the PTAB, leading to institution of trial. The petition asserted grounds of anticipation (102) and obviousness (103) over prior art references Fukui, Sauter, and Sedor.
patent denied
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. et al. v.Intellectual Ventures II
· IPR2024-01226
LENOVO failed its IPR challenge against Intellectual Ventures II's patent covering integrated circuit calibration, as the Board found Petitioner could not overcome key limitations of the claims using prior art. The denial centered on insufficient accounting for a three-dimensional 'valid operation range.'
patent instituted
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. et al. v.Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al.
· IPR2024-01225
Lenovo successfully petitioned the PTAB to institute IPR proceedings against a patent owned by University of Rochester/Intellectual Ventures regarding Multiple Clock Domain Architectures (MCD). The Board found sufficient evidence that various combinations of prior art render multiple claimed features obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
patent denied
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. et al. v.Intellectual Ventures I LLC
· IPR2024-01224
Lenovo's IPR challenge against Intellectual Ventures over Cyclic Diversity Systems was denied by the PTAB. The Board found that Petitioner failed to meet the threshold burden regarding the prior art reference Dammann’s status as a printed publication under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).
patent instituted
Samsung Display Co., Ltd. et al. v.Pictiva Displays International Ltd. et al.
· IPR2024-01223
Samsung Display successfully challenged Pictiva Displays' patent claims in an IPR proceeding, demonstrating a reasonable likelihood of success on obviousness grounds. The Board found that combinations of prior art references were sufficient to invalidate several key display technology claims.
patent instituted
Early Warning Services, LLC v.Intellectual Ventures II LLC
· IPR2024-01221
The PTAB institution decision found sufficient evidence for Early Warning Services, LLC to challenge numerous claims of Intellectual Ventures II LLC based on anticipation and obviousness. The Board adopted the Petitioner’s plain and ordinary meaning for key terms like 'embedded,' rejecting restrictive interpretations by the Patent Owner.
patent instituted
Samsung Display Co., Ltd. et al. v.Pictiva Displays International Ltd. et al.
· IPR2024-01222
Samsung Display successfully navigated a discretionary denial challenge in the IPR, leading to the institution of claims 34-46. The Board found that the petitioner demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of success based on Yamazaki/Fujimori combinations for OLED encapsulation technology.
patent instituted
Deltran USA LLC et al. v.The Noco Company
· IPR2024-01219
Deltran USA LLC et al. successfully petitioned to institute an IPR against The Noco Company's patent (11667203) covering jump start/battery charging systems. The Board found sufficient evidence of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103, despite the Patent Owner's counterarguments regarding technical limitations.
patent instituted
Olympus Corporation et al. v.Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC
· IPR2024-01220
Olympus Corporation et al. successfully navigated the institution phase in an IPR against Optimum Imaging Technologies, LLC regarding imaging systems technology. The Board preliminarily found a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability based on multiple grounds of obviousness (103).
patent instituted
CommScope Technologies LLC et al. v.Belden Canada ULC et al.
· IPR2024-01218
CommScope Technologies LLC successfully petitioned to institute IPR against Belden Canada ULC's patent, asserting obviousness and anticipation over prior art references including Fukui. The Board found Petitioner’s arguments persuasive regarding the technical scope of the modular fiber optic cassette system.
patent instituted
NXTGEN TOYS, LLC v.ZipString LLC
· IPR2024-01213
NXTGEN TOYS successfully petitioned the PTAB to institute an IPR against ZipString LLC regarding string shooting devices. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on anticipation and obviousness grounds, specifically addressing whether YouTube videos qualify as printed publications under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1).
patent instituted
Avanos Medical, Inc. v.Stratus Medical, LLC
· IPR2024-01212
Avanos Medical successfully petitioned to institute an IPR against Stratus Medical regarding a neurotomy system patent (10925664). The Board found reasonable likelihood of success on the obviousness grounds, targeting claims 1-29.
patent instituted
Avanos Medical, Inc. v.Stratus Medical, LLC
· IPR2024-01211
Avanos Medical successfully navigated the institution phase of an IPR against Stratus Medical's RF neurotomy patent (10736688). The Board found a reasonable likelihood of success on multiple grounds, allowing the case to proceed to trial.
patent instituted
Avanos Medical, Inc. v.Stratus Medical, LLC
· IPR2024-01210
Avanos Medical, Inc. successfully convinced the PTAB to institute an IPR against Stratus Medical, LLC's '688 patent. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of success based on obviousness grounds (35 U.S.C. § 103) using prior art combinations like Racz and Lee.
patent instituted
Avanos Medical, Inc. v.Stratus Medical, LLC
· IPR2024-01209
Avanos Medical successfully petitioned to institute IPR proceedings against Stratus Medical's patent, demonstrating a reasonable likelihood of success on obviousness grounds. The Board found sufficient evidence that the claimed RF neurotomy features could be achieved by combining existing prior art references.
patent instituted
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. et al. v.Stellar, LLC
· IPR2024-01208
The PTAB instituted the IPR for 9912914, finding a reasonable likelihood of success on all challenged obviousness grounds (103). The petitioner argued that combinations of prior art references—including Yerazunis, Fiore, Ely, and Lewellen—would render claims 1-23 obvious to a POSITA.
patent denied
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. et al. v.Stellar, LLC
· IPR2024-01208
The Director granted review and vacated the institution decision in a Motorola vs. Stellar IPR, ultimately denying institution based on Fintiv factors favoring denial due to substantial parallel proceeding investment.
patent instituted
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. et al. v.Stellar, LLC
· IPR2024-01207
The PTAB granted institution for the IPR proceeding, finding a reasonable likelihood of success for Motorola Solutions against Stellar LLC. The Board found sufficient evidence that combining prior art references would teach the challenged limitations, moving the case toward substantive obviousness analysis.
