US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 317 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent instituted · Apr 10, 2024
Runergy Alabama Inc et al. v.Trina Solar Co. Ltd.
· IPR2025-00007
The PTAB has issued an Institution Decision for IPR2025-00007, finding that the Petitioner demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim. The case involves obviousness challenges (103) against Trina Solar's solar cell patent using combinations of prior art from Jin, Feldmann, Chang, Seo, and Watabe.
patent denied · Apr 10, 2024
Solus Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. et al. v.SK nexilis Co., Ltd.
· IPR2025-00005
The PTAB denied the IPR petition against claims 1-4 of U.S. Patent No. 9,457,541, finding that the combination of prior art references did not render the copper foil obvious. The Board ruled that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable expectation of success when combining properties from materially different sources.
patent denied · Apr 10, 2024
Solus Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. et al. v.SK nexilis Co., Ltd.
· IPR2025-00005
Solus Advanced Materials Co. lost its request for rehearing after the PTAB denied institution of IPR against SK nexilis regarding copper foil patents.
patent denied · Apr 10, 2024
Solus Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. et al. v.SK nexilis Co., Ltd.
· IPR2025-00005
Solus Advanced Materials Co., Ltd.'s request for rehearing was denied by the PTAB, upholding the initial decision to deny institution of IPR against SK nexilis's copper foil patent.
patent final · Apr 10, 2024
Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. et al. v.Tecan Group AG
· IPR2025-00016
The PTAB issued a final written decision rejecting all grounds of unpatentability asserted by the Petitioner regarding NGS target enrichment claims. The Board adopted the Patent Owner's narrow definition of 'enrichment,' finding that the prior art failed to teach the claimed proportional increase in target fragments.
patent final · Apr 10, 2024
Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. et al. v.Tecan Group AG
· IPR2025-00015
The PTAB upheld the patent against IPR challenges related to NGS target enrichment. The Board clarified that 'enrichment' requires an increased proportion of the sequence relative to others, not just a raw increase in fragment count. Petitioner failed to meet its burden of proof on unpatentability.
patent Final Written Decision · Apr 10, 2024
Runergy Alabama Inc et al. v.Trina Solar Co. Ltd.
· IPR2025-00007
The PTAB issued a Final Written Decision finding all 11 challenged claims unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). The Board found that the Petitioner successfully demonstrated obviousness over combinations of prior art, specifically involving Chang and Jin for isolation regions in solar cells.
patent denied · Apr 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al. v.Secure Wi-Fi LLC
· IPR2024-01369
The PTAB denied Samsung's request for Director Review of the decisions denying institution of four IPRs targeting Secure Wi‑Fi patents, leaving the institution denials in place.
patent denied · Apr 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al. v.Secure Wi-Fi LLC
· IPR2024-01368
The PTAB denied Samsung's request for Director Review of the institution decision in IPR2024‑01368, leaving the earlier denial of institution in place.
patent · Apr 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al. v.Secure Wi-Fi LLC
· IPR2024-01369
Samsung has filed a Request for Director Review to overturn a PTAB discretionary denial that applied retroactively after the Vidal memo was rescinded. The petition argues due‑process violations and arbitrary weighting of Fintiv factors. Samsung seeks to submit a Sotera stipulation and have the institution decision vacated.
patent · Apr 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al. v.Secure Wi-Fi LLC
· IPR2024-01368
Samsung has filed a Director Review request to overturn a PTAB institution denial that relied on a rescinded Vidal memo. The petitioner contends lack of notice of retroactive effect and arbitrary weighting of Fintiv factors, seeking to submit a Sotera stipulation.
patent · Apr 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al. v.Secure Wi-Fi LLC
· IPR2024-01367
Samsung has filed a Petition for Director Review after the PTAB denied institution of its IPR on the ‘384 Wi‑Fi patent. The challenger contends the retroactive rescission of the Vidal memo and the Board’s Fintiv factor analysis violated due process.
patent · Apr 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al. v.Secure Wi-Fi LLC
· IPR2024-01369
Secure Wi‑Fi LLC defends the PTAB’s denial of institution against Samsung’s request for Director Review, arguing the Board’s discretionary analysis of Fintiv factors was proper and the petitioner’s new arguments untimely.
patent denied · Apr 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Secure Wi-Fi LLC
· IPR2024-01366
The PTAB denied Samsung’s request for Director Review of the institution denial in IPR2024-01366, leaving the original denial in place. The order applies to four related IPRs involving Secure Wi‑Fi patents.
patent · Apr 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Secure Wi-Fi LLC
· IPR2024-01366
Court decision.
patent · Apr 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al. v.Secure Wi-Fi LLC
· IPR2024-01369
Court decision.
patent denied · Apr 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al. v.Secure Wi-Fi LLC
· IPR2024-01367
The PTAB denied Samsung’s request for Director Review of the institution decisions in four related IPRs, including IPR2024‑01367 covering Secure Wi‑Fi’s patent. The denial leaves the original institution outcomes in place.
patent · Apr 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Secure Wi-Fi LLC
· IPR2024-01366
Samsung Electronics filed Director Review requests for four IPRs challenging Secure Wi‑Fi’s U.S. Patent No. 9,717,005. The PTAB Director instructed Secure Wi‑Fi to submit a brief response within five business days, prohibiting new evidence. The review decision is pending.
patent · Apr 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al. v.Secure Wi-Fi LLC
· IPR2024-01368
Samsung has requested Director Review of four IPRs involving Secure Wi‑Fi’s patent. The PTAB has limited the patent owner’s response to five pages and barred new evidence. The Director’s decision on the review is pending.
patent · Apr 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al. v.Secure Wi-Fi LLC
· IPR2024-01367
Court decision.
patent · Apr 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Secure Wi-Fi LLC
· IPR2024-01366
Samsung has filed a Request for Director Review seeking to overturn a PTAB discretionary denial that applied the rescinded Vidal memo retroactively. The petitioner alleges abuse of discretion and due‑process violations, arguing the Board’s weighting of Fintiv factors was arbitrary.
patent · Apr 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al. v.Secure Wi-Fi LLC
· IPR2024-01368
Court decision.
patent denied · Apr 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al. v.Secure Wi-Fi LLC
· IPR2024-01367
Secure Wi‑Fi LLC defended the PTAB’s denial of institution against Samsung’s request for Director review, arguing the Board’s use of Fintiv factors was proper and the petitioner’s new arguments untimely. The Board’s decision stands.
patent · Apr 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al. v.Secure Wi-Fi LLC
· IPR2024-01367
Samsung has petitioned the PTAB to invalidate Secure Wi‑Fi’s ’384 patent covering fake MAC address techniques. The petition relies on obviousness over Vardi, IEEE 802.11, Yun, Satish and Jalfon. No discretionary denial is requested.
