US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 317 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent denied
TikTok Inc. et al. v.NTECH Properties, Inc.
· IPR2024-01339
TikTok's IPR challenge against NTECH Properties failed before the PTAB, with the Board denying all grounds of obviousness. The petitioner could not demonstrate that the cited prior art taught or suggested the limitations of the challenged claims in the video streaming patent.
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01337
The PTAB institution decision allows Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. to challenge 30 claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,588,110 B2 based on obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103). The Board adopted the Petitioner's view of the level of ordinary skill in the art and conducted claim construction for key 'means for' limitations. This sets the stage for a full IPR review against Headwater Research LLC.
patent denied
TikTok Inc. et al. v.NTECH Properties, Inc.
· IPR2024-01338
TikTok's IPR petition against NTECH Properties was denied by the PTAB, failing to establish a reasonable likelihood of success on obviousness grounds. The Board found that Petitioner could not adequately teach or suggest key limitations from the cited prior art (Marcus156 and Ferman).
patent instituted
Geneoscopy, Inc. v.Exact Sciences Corporation
· IPR2024-01330
The PTAB instituted an IPR in a colorectal cancer screening case, finding a reasonable likelihood that Geneoscopy's challenged claims are unpatentable. The Board accepted the petitioner's argument that combinations of various prior art references teach every limitation of the claims with a reason for combination.
patent instituted
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED et al. v.COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,
· IPR2024-01336
Qualcomm successfully secured institution for its IPR against Cobblestone Wireless, despite the petition being substantively identical to a previously instituted Samsung proceeding. This decision emphasizes that lack of 'road-mapping' alone is insufficient grounds for discretionary denial when the claims are highly relevant.
patent denied
Microsoft Corporation v.Proxense, LLC
· IPR2024-01327
The PTAB denied Microsoft's request to institute Inter Partes Review (IPR) against Proxense's patent 8,886,954. The denial was based on a procedural condition that required prior non-institution in a related proceeding.
patent denied
Microsoft Corporation v.Proxense, LLC
· IPR2024-01326
The PTAB denied Microsoft's request to institute Inter Partes Review against Proxense's patent because a related review was already underway.
patent instituted
Quotient Technology, LLC et al. v.Intelligent Clearing Network Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-01324
Quotient Technology successfully convinced the PTAB to institute review of patent 9098855 against Intelligent Clearing Network Inc. The Board found a reasonable likelihood that Petitioner would prevail on anticipation and obviousness grounds, primarily citing prior art from Deaton. This decision allows Quotient to proceed with challenging key claims related to coupon redemption networks.
patent denied
Quotient Technology, LLC et al. v.Intelligent Clearing Network Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-01325
The PTAB denied institution of IPR for Quotient Technology against Intelligent Clearing Network regarding patent 10846729. The Board found the Petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on obviousness grounds over prior art references like Aggarwal and Deaton.
patent instituted
Quotient Technology, LLC et al. v.Intelligent Clearing Network Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-01323
The PTAB granted institution for Quotient Technology's IPR against Intelligent Clearing Network Inc.'s coupon redemption patent (9070133). The Board found a reasonable likelihood of success over Paul and Brown, despite rejecting the petitioner's narrow claim construction.
patent instituted
Google LLC v.DH International Ltd.
· IPR2024-01322
Google LLC successfully petitioned the PTAB to challenge DH International Ltd.'s patentability, leading the Board to institute IPR proceedings on all 20 claims. The Board adopted a broad construction of 'activation cue' favorable to Google and found that the Petitioner met the standard for institution based on obviousness grounds over prior art references Mooney and Lee.
patent denied
Google LLC v.DH International Ltd.
· IPR2024-01321
Google LLC's IPR challenge against DH International Ltd.'s payment card patent was denied by the PTAB. The Board found that Google failed to establish a reasonable likelihood of prevailing, specifically regarding the obviousness claims over Ong and Hoff.
patent denied
Google LLC v.--
· IPR2024-01320
Google LLC's attempt to challenge a patent via IPR was denied by the PTAB because another, earlier petition challenging the same patent had already been instituted.
patent instituted
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al. v.RavenWhite Security, Inc.
· IPR2024-01316
Home Depot successfully petitioned for IPR institution against RavenWhite Security's patent (10594823), challenging claims 1-10 on grounds of obviousness over Hinton and Varghese. The Board found a reasonable likelihood that Home Depot could prevail, allowing the dispute to proceed.
patent denied
Google LLC v.--
· IPR2024-01319
Google LLC's attempt to challenge patent 9,679,289 B1 was denied by the PTAB because a prior inter partes review (IPR) of the same patent had already been instituted.
patent denied
Google LLC v.--
· IPR2024-01318
The PTAB denied Google's attempt to file a second IPR against PROXENSE's patent because the Board had already instituted an earlier review.
patent instituted
Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al. v.Stellar, LLC
· IPR2024-01314
Motorola Solutions successfully petitioned for the IPR institution on 20 claims of Stellar's '910 patent. The Board found sufficient evidence across multiple grounds of obviousness to overcome the Patent Owner’s request for discretionary denial, allowing the substantive challenge to proceed.
patent instituted
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD v.Optronic Sciences, LLC
· IPR2024-01315
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD successfully petitioned to institute an IPR against Optronic Sciences, LLC's patent 8158477. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on obviousness grounds over multiple prior art references.
patent denied
Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al. v.Stellar, LLC
· IPR2024-01314
The Director granted review and vacated the institution decision in a Motorola Solutions IPR against Stellar LLC. Institution was ultimately denied, aligning with prior findings that weighed factors against proceeding.
patent instituted
Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al. v.Stellar, LLC
· IPR2024-01313
Motorola Solutions successfully secured institution at the PTAB for its IPR challenge against Stellar, LLC's patent (10523901). The Board found a reasonable likelihood of success on all grounds, despite Patent Owner arguments regarding parallel district court litigation.
patent denied
Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al. v.Stellar, LLC
· IPR2024-01313
The PTAB granted Director Review and denied institution of IPR for Motorola Solutions against Stellar, citing the need to maintain system integrity.
patent instituted
Genius Sports v.SportsCastr Inc.
· IPR2024-01311
The PTAB institution decision granted IPR against claims 16-30 of the '218 patent, finding sufficient evidence to overcome initial defenses. The Board found that Petitioner successfully demonstrated a rationale for combining prior art references (Ellis and Spivey) to meet the institutional standard for obviousness.
patent instituted
Biofrontera Incorporated et al. v.Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.
· IPR2024-01312
Biofrontera's IPR challenge against Sun Pharmaceutical regarding photodynamic therapy illuminators was instituted by the PTAB. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on obviousness grounds over Lundahl and Larsen, focusing on combining prior art elements for flexible device design.
patent instituted
Genius Sports Ltd. v.SportsCastr Inc.
· IPR2024-01310
The PTAB institution decision was granted, finding sufficient rationale for the Petitioner to combine teachings from prior art references (Ellis and Spivey) under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The Board specifically found that combining Ellis's content source with Spivey’s live data server devices would improve latency in real-time event delivery.
