US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 315 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent instituted
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01396
The PTAB granted institution of IPR for Samsung against Headwater, finding a reasonable likelihood that the challenged wireless device claims are unpatentable over Bennett and Vadde.
patent denied
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01396
The PTAB denied the institution of IPR2024-01396 concerning patent 9647918, vacating a prior decision. The proceeding is now at a procedural standstill.
patent instituted
Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. v.MHL Custom, Inc.
· IPR2024-01391
Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. successfully petitioned the PTAB to institute an IPR against MHL Custom, Inc.'s hydrofoil watercraft patent (9586659). The Board found a reasonable likelihood that claims 16-23, 26-28 are obvious over prior art references Evolo and Woolley.
patent denied
Tableau Software, LLC et al. v.iCharts LLC
· IPR2024-01389
Tableau Software's IPR challenge against iCharts LLC was denied by the PTAB on grounds of obviousness (103). The Board found insufficient evidence that prior art references taught or suggested the claimed interactive data visualization features.
patent denied
Tableau Software, LLC et al. v.iCharts LLC
· IPR2024-01388
Tableau Software's IPR challenge against iCharts LLC was denied by the PTAB on grounds of obviousness (103). The Board found that the petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence demonstrating a reasonable likelihood of prevailing, specifically regarding combining prior art references.
patent instituted
Tableau Software, LLC et al. v.iCharts LLC
· IPR2024-01387
Tableau Software successfully instituted an IPR against iCharts LLC regarding patent 8271892 for data visualization technology. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one claim based on the preliminary record, advancing the challenge to trial.
patent denied
Western Digital Technologies, Inc. et al. v.Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
· IPR2024-01386
Western Digital Technologies' IPR petition against Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 was denied by the PTAB, finding insufficient evidence of obviousness. The Board specifically rejected the argument that substituting CoFeB for Fe would be obvious based on prior art teachings regarding amorphous versus crystalline structures.
patent denied
Western Digital Technologies, Inc. et al. v.Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
· IPR2024-01385
Western Digital Technologies, Inc. failed to convince the PTAB that its claims related to Magnetic Tunnel Junction Devices were unpatentable over various prior art references. The Board denied institution because the petition lacked a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on obviousness grounds (35 U.S.C. § 103).
patent denied
Western Digital Technologies, Inc. et al. v.Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
· IPR2024-01384
Western Digital Technologies' IPR challenge against Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 regarding Magnetic Tunnel Junctions (MTJ) was denied by the PTAB. The Board found that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate a sufficient motivation to combine prior art references, specifically rejecting arguments based on barrier height optimization.
patent instituted
CommScope Technologies LLC et al. v.Belden Canada ULC et al.
· IPR2024-01382
CommScope Technologies LLC successfully petitioned to institute IPR proceedings against Belden Canada ULC et al., challenging claims 1-30 of patent 11740423. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of success based primarily on the Fukui prior art, focusing on modular cassette configurations.
patent instituted
CMS CEPCOR LTD et al. v.Sandvik Intellectual Property AB et al.
· IPR2024-01380
The PTAB granted institution of IPR for U.S. Patent 9,827,568, challenging claims related to gyratory crushers. CMS Cepcor successfully demonstrated a reasonable likelihood that the patent is obvious over prior art references.
patent instituted
CMS CEPCOR LTD et al. v.Sandvik Intellectual Property AB et al.
· IPR2024-01381
CMS Cepcor successfully petitioned to institute IPR against Sandvik's gyratory crusher patent (11,014,090 B2), setting the stage for a complex obviousness trial involving three prior art references.
patent denied
Charter Communications, Inc. v.Adaptive Spectrum and Signal Alignment, Inc.
· IPR2024-01379
The PTAB denied institution for Charter Communications' IPR against Adaptive Spectrum, citing Fintiv factors and the proximity of trial. The Board adopted a construction of 'periodically monitor' meaning 'monitor at regular intervals of time.'
patent instituted
Avation Medical, Inc. v.EMKinetics, Inc.
· IPR2024-01378
Avation Medical successfully challenged EMKinetics' patent (9002477) in a PTAB decision, asserting that the claims were anticipated or obvious. The Board found strong evidence supporting unpatentability over multiple prior art references, moving the case toward trial.
patent instituted
POSCO Co., Ltd. et al. v.ARCELORMITTAL
· IPR2024-01377
POSCO Co., Ltd. successfully petitioned the PTAB to institute an IPR against ArcelorMittal's patent, arguing that multiple prior art combinations render the claims unpatentable under 102 and 103. The Board found sufficient merit in the petition, despite factors favoring discretionary denial, leading to the institution of the review on all 25 challenged claims.
patent
POSCO Co., Ltd. et al. v.ARCELORMITTAL
· IPR2024-01377
The Director denied review of institution decisions in the POSCO v. ArcelorMittal IPRs and remanded the case to the PTAB to manage multiple parallel challenges.
patent instituted
POSCO Co., Ltd. et al. v.ARCELORMITTAL
· IPR2024-01376
The PTAB instituted the IPR, finding that POSCO Co., Ltd. demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim against ArcelorMittal's patent. The Board found grounds for anticipation and obviousness across all 30 claims based on prior art including Engels, Takagi, and GMW14400.
patent
POSCO Co., Ltd. et al. v.ARCELORMITTAL
· IPR2024-01376
The Director denied review requests in the POSCO v. ArcelorMittal IPR proceedings and remanded the case to the PTAB to manage multiple parallel petitions.
patent instituted
Avation Medical, Inc. v.EMKinetics, Inc.
· IPR2024-01375
Avation Medical successfully secured the institution of its IPR against EMKinetics, challenging claims 1-13 based on obviousness over combinations of prior art. The Board found that Petitioner adequately supported unpatentability by demonstrating skilled artisans could make the claimed modifications to existing nerve stimulation methods.
patent instituted
FUJIFILM Corporation et al. v.Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC
· IPR2024-01374
The PTAB instituted the IPR on all 30 challenged claims for FUJIFILM Corporation et al. against Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC, finding a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability over Sarbadhikari and Katagiri. The decision was based on Petitioner's diligent filing and favorable factors regarding parallel district court litigation despite Patent Owner arguments to the contrary.
patent instituted
Nikon Corporation et al. v.Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC
· IPR2024-01373
The PTAB granted institution of trial in this IPR concerning digital camera image processing and aberration correction. The Board found sufficient likelihood of unpatentability based on obviousness arguments combining prior art references (Niikawa and Enomoto).
patent instituted
Nikon Corporation et al. v.Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC
· IPR2024-01372
The PTAB instituted the IPR petition, finding a reasonable likelihood of invalidity over Niikawa and Enomoto. The Board preliminarily construed 'database' to have its plain meaning, rejecting the patent owner's attempt to limit it to updatable systems.
patent denied
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.Scale Video Coding LLC
· IPR2024-01371
The PTAB denied Cisco Systems' IPR petition against Scale Video Coding LLC, finding the asserted claims were not reasonably likely to be unpatentable over prior art references. The decision focused on technical limitations regarding bandwidth identification in video routers.
patent denied
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al. v.Secure Wi-Fi LLC
· IPR2024-01369
Samsung's IPR petition against Secure Wi-Fi LLC was denied by the PTAB. The Board determined that the proximity to a parallel district court trial date weighed heavily in favor of discretionary denial under Fintiv factors.
