US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 308 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent denied
YANGTZE MEMORY TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY, LTD. v.Micron Technology, Inc. et al.
· IPR2025-00099
The PTAB denied institution of an IPR challenge against Micron by Yangtze Memory Technologies because the Petitioner failed to satisfy its statutory duty to identify all Real Parties in Interest (RPIs).
patent denied
Yangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd. v.Micron Technology, Inc. et al.
· IPR2025-00098
The PTAB denied IPR petitions filed by Yangtze Memory Technologies (YMTC) against Micron. The denial was based not on patentability, but on YMTC's failure to satisfy its statutory duty to identify all Real Parties in Interest.
patent instituted
Yangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd. v.Micron Technology, Inc. et al.
· IPR2025-00098
Yangtze Memory Technologies Company successfully convinced the PTAB to institute proceedings against Micron Technology for patent infringement. The Board found that Petitioner showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one claim, despite arguments regarding foreign state actor status and RPI issues.
patent instituted
Abbott Laboratories et al. v.MIRACOR MEDICAL SA
· IPR2025-00096
Abbott Laboratories challenged MIRACOR MEDICAL SA's cardiac assist pump patents based on obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103). The Board adopted the Patent Owner’s broader claim constructions for key terms like 'magneto coupling,' leading to the institution of the IPR.
patent instituted
American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. et al. v.Neapco Components, LLC
· IPR2025-00091
American Axle & Manufacturing successfully petitioned to challenge the patentability of Neapco Components' propeller shaft joint assembly claims before the PTAB. The Board instituted the IPR, finding a reasonable likelihood that the Renegade Manual qualified as prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1).
patent instituted
Innoscience America, Inc. et al. v.Infineon Technologies Americas Corp.
· IPR2025-00094
The PTAB granted institution of IPR for Innoscience America against Infineon Technologies, challenging 16 claims related to merged cascode transistors. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability based on prior art combinations.
patent instituted
American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. et al. v.Neapco Components, LLC
· IPR2025-00090
The PTAB institution decision found a reasonable likelihood that the Renegade Manual was publicly accessible in 2016, establishing it as prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1). This finding allows American Axle & Manufacturing to challenge all 18 claims of Neapco Components' patent.
patent denied
Nuvei Technologies, Inc. et al. v.Autoscribe Corporation
· IPR2025-00089
The PTAB denied institution of an IPR petition filed by Nuvei Technologies against Autoscribe Corporation's payment processing patents. The Board found that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on obviousness grounds, specifically regarding negative limitations in tokenization claims.
patent denied
Charter Communications, Inc. et al. v.Adaptive Spectrum and Signal Alignment, Inc.
· IPR2025-00088
The PTAB denied Charter Communications' IPR against Adaptive Spectrum and Signal Alignment regarding network performance patents. The Board cited the proximity of a parallel district court trial date to the statutory deadline as a key factor favoring denial.
patent denied
Charter Communications, Inc. et al. v.Adaptive Spectrum and Signal Alignment, Inc.
· IPR2025-00087
The PTAB denied Charter Communications' IPR against Adaptive Spectrum, citing the Fintiv factors and lack of compelling merits despite strong arguments regarding network optimization technology.
patent denied
MediaTek, Inc. et al. v.Redstone Logics LLC
· IPR2025-00085
The PTAB denied institution for an IPR challenge against Redstone Logics LLC's patent, finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on obviousness grounds. The dispute centered on multi-core processor design and clock ratio controllers.
patent denied
Fortinet, Inc. v.Croga Innovations Ltd.
· IPR2025-00086
Fortinet's attempt to invalidate Croga Innovations Ltd.'s patent on network security claims was denied by the PTAB. The Board found that Fortinet failed to demonstrate obviousness over prior art, specifically Delco and Adams. This denial maintains the validity of key virtualization and firewall technology for Croga.
patent instituted
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC
· IPR2025-00083
The PTAB instituted an IPR challenging Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC's patent (No. 10638463) for obviousness over prior art including Takeda, Yan, and 3GPP R1-1711853. The petitioner group, comprising major wireless carriers and tech companies, successfully argued that the claimed method is unpatentable in 5G NR resource allocation.
patent denied
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC
· IPR2025-00084
The PTAB denied institution for an IPR concerning Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC's patent, citing the proximity and significant investment in related district court proceedings. This decision emphasizes efficiency considerations under Fintiv factors when parallel litigation is active.
patent denied
Apple Inc. v.Proxense, LLC
· IPR2025-00074
The PTAB denied Apple's IPR against Proxense because a related review of the same patent had already been instituted in another proceeding.
patent instituted
CrowdStrike, Inc. et al. v.GoSecure, Inc.
· IPR2025-00070
CrowdStrike successfully secured institution of IPR against GoSecure's patent 9,954,872. The Board adopted a broad construction for the key term 'association,' reinforcing the likelihood of unpatentability.
patent instituted
CrowdStrike, Inc. et al. v.GoSecure, Inc.
· IPR2025-00070
CrowdStrike initiated an IPR against GoSecure's '872 patent, focusing on obviousness (103) in the field of Intrusion Detection Systems. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of success for Ground 1 regarding Claim 1 over Capalik, advancing the case toward trial.
patent
CrowdStrike, Inc. et al. v.GoSecure, Inc.
· IPR2025-00070
The Director granted review of an institution decision in a patent dispute between CrowdStrike and GoSecure. The case is now remanded to the PTAB to determine which petition, if any, should proceed after claim construction.
patent denied
CrowdStrike, Inc. et al. v.GoSecure, Inc.
· IPR2025-00069
The PTAB denied institution of IPR for CrowdStrike against GoSecure, finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on its obviousness grounds.
patent denied
CrowdStrike, Inc. et al. v.GoSecure, Inc.
· IPR2025-00068
The PTAB denied institution of IPR for CrowdStrike against GoSecure, finding that the correct claim construction was already established in a related proceeding.
patent instituted
CrowdStrike, Inc. et al. v.GoSecure, Inc.
· IPR2025-00068
CrowdStrike successfully petitioned to institute IPR proceedings against GoSecure regarding network intrusion detection methods. The Board adopted a broad claim construction for IDS/IPS systems, finding reasonable likelihood of obviousness over Capalik and King.
patent
CrowdStrike, Inc. et al. v.GoSecure, Inc.
· IPR2025-00068
The Director granted review of the institution decision in a dispute between CrowdStrike and GoSecure, vacating the initial orders. The case is remanded for the Board to determine which claim construction (broader or narrower) should be used before deciding on trial.
patent denied
Liberty Energy Inc. et al. v.U.S. WELL SERVICES, LLC et al.
· IPR2025-00066
The PTAB denied the petition to challenge claims 1-20 of patent 10598258, finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The Board rejected arguments regarding obviousness, noting insufficient motivation to combine prior art references in the claimed manner.
patent denied
CrowdStrike, Inc. et al. v.GoSecure, Inc.
· IPR2025-00067
The PTAB denied CrowdStrike's IPR against GoSecure's patent, finding no reasonable likelihood of success on the grounds of obviousness. The Board specifically rejected the petitioner's argument that prior art taught fingerprint generation within a virtual machine monitor.
