US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 296 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent terminated or settled · May 7, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-01141
Amazon and Nokia filed a joint motion to terminate four IPRs after reaching a settlement. The Board granted the termination and ordered the settlement documents to be kept confidential.
patent terminated or settled · May 7, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-01139
Amazon and Nokia have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 6,950,469 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The motion relies on 35 U.S.C. §317(a) and argues that termination saves resources and aligns with public‑policy goals.
patent terminated or settled · May 7, 2024
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD v.Optronic Sciences LLC
· IPR2024-01134
Samsung Display and BOE have reached a settlement that resolves all disputes in an ITC investigation concerning OLED display modules, prompting a joint motion to terminate the case.
patent · May 7, 2024
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD v.Optronic Sciences, LLC
· IPR2024-01133
Optronic Sciences requests Director Review of a PTAB decision, contending that BOE’s undisclosed state‑linked controller violates RPI requirements. The petition cites recent Director policy that makes such omissions fatal. The request seeks vacatur of the decision and termination of the IPR.
patent terminated or settled · May 7, 2024
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD v.Optronic Sciences, LLC
· IPR2024-01133
BOE Technology Group and Optronic Sciences settled their IPR disputes, leading the Board to grant withdrawal of pending Director Review requests for the three IPRs.
patent · May 7, 2024
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. v.Optronic Sciences LLC
· IPR2024-01130
BOE Technology Group opposes Optronic Sciences' Director Review request, asserting it is the only real party in interest and that BEH lacks control. The petition highlights PO's untimely filing and new arguments, seeking denial of the request.
patent terminated or settled · May 7, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-01140
Amazon and Nokia settled their IPR disputes over four wireless patents, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceedings and keep the settlement documents confidential.
patent · May 7, 2024
Apple Inc. v.S.M.R Innovations LTD et al.
· IPR2024-01048
Apple has filed a request for rehearing, arguing that the PTAB abused its discretion in instituting an IPR on patent 10,547,648. The owners claim the Board relied on unmapped prior art and misread claim language.
patent denied · May 7, 2024
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD v.Optronic Sciences LLC
· IPR2024-01134
The PTAB denied Optronic Sciences’ request to revisit the institution of six inter partes reviews filed by BOE Technology Group. The Board found no extraordinary circumstances and held that the deadline for additional briefing had passed.
patent terminated or settled · May 7, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-01141
Amazon and Nokia filed a joint request to treat their settlement documents as confidential and to terminate the IPR over patent 8,036,273.
patent · May 7, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-01139
Amazon and Nokia have settled their IPR over Nokia's wireless‑technology patent and jointly request that the settlement documents be kept confidential, asking the PTAB to terminate the proceeding.
patent terminated or settled · May 7, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-01141
Amazon and Nokia have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent No. 8,036,273 and filed a joint motion to terminate the inter partes review. The Board is asked to end the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a).
patent · May 7, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-01140
Amazon and Nokia have settled their IPR over U.S. Patent 7,280,599 and have jointly moved to terminate the proceeding, requesting the settlement documents be kept confidential.
patent · May 7, 2024
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD v.Optronic Sciences, LLC
· IPR2024-01133
BOE Technology Group opposes Optronic Sciences' request for Director Review, asserting that Beijing Electronics Holdings is not a real party in interest and that the patent owner delayed raising RPI issues. The Board’s prior rulings supporting BOE’s RPI identification are reaffirmed, and the Director Review request is urged to be denied.
patent terminated or settled · May 7, 2024
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD v.Optronic Sciences, LLC
· IPR2024-01133
Samsung Display and BOE have filed a joint motion to terminate the ITC investigation into OLED display modules, citing a confidential settlement that resolves all disputes. The Board is asked to end the case under statutory settlement provisions.
patent · May 7, 2024
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. v.Optronic Sciences LLC
· IPR2024-01130
Optronic Sciences LLC seeks Director Review to vacate the Board’s decision in IPR2024-01130, arguing that BOE’s disclosed controller, BEH, makes the RPI issue unresolved. The petition cites recent Director memoranda that shift the burden to the petitioner to identify all RPIs.
patent terminated or settled · May 7, 2024
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. v.Optronic Sciences LLC
· IPR2024-01130
Samsung Display and BOE have filed a joint motion to terminate the ITC investigation over OLED display modules, citing a confidential settlement that resolves all disputes.
patent terminated or settled · May 7, 2024
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-01139
Amazon and Nokia settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 6,950,469, leading to a joint motion that terminated four related inter partes review proceedings. The Board granted the termination and ordered the settlement documents to be kept confidential.
patent · May 7, 2024
Apple Inc. v.S.M.R Innovations LTD et al.
· IPR2024-01048
Apple seeks Director review to overturn a PTAB decision that found its HomeRF‑based cellular‑call routing patent obvious. The Patent Owners contend the Board introduced a new adaptation rationale not raised by Apple, violating procedural rules.
patent all challenged claims upheld · May 7, 2024
Apple Inc. v.S.M.R Innovations LTD et al.
· IPR2024-01048
Apple’s petition argues that the PTAB correctly found the challenged WLAN routing claims non‑obvious, emphasizing that unclaimed details like transcoding are routine. The Director’s request for review was denied, leaving the Board’s decision intact.
patent denied · May 7, 2024
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD v.Optronic Sciences, LLC
· IPR2024-01133
The PTAB denied Optronic Sciences' request to reconsider the institution decision in IPR2024‑01133, finding no extraordinary circumstances despite recent guidance changes. The Board applied the Chief Judge’s and Director’s memoranda and upheld the original institution.
patent · May 7, 2024
Apple Inc. v.S.M.R Innovations LTD et al.
· IPR2024-01048
Apple filed an authorized response opposing the patent owner’s Director Review Request to vacate the PTAB’s institution of IPR2024-01048. Apple contends the Board correctly treated the method steps as order‑agnostic and that the prior art analysis remains sound.
patent instituted · May 7, 2024
Apple Inc. v.S.M.R Innovations LTD et al.
· IPR2024-01048
Patent owners S.M.R Innovations and Y.M.R Tech have filed a Request for Director Review challenging the PTAB’s decision to institute IPR2024‑01048 against Apple Inc. The request, submitted by lead counsel Cortney Alexander of Kent & Risley, seeks reconsideration of the institution.
patent denied · May 7, 2024
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. v.Optronic Sciences LLC
· IPR2024-01130
The PTAB denied Optronic Sciences’ request to revisit the institution of six inter partes reviews, finding no extraordinary circumstances and that the deadline for further briefing had passed.
