US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 279 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent · Jun 9, 2024
Shenzhen Kangvape Technology Co., Ltd. v.RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-01406
The patent owner seeks Director Review in IPR2024-01406; the Board limited the petitioner’s response to five pages and barred new evidence.
patent · Jun 9, 2024
Shenzhen Kangvape Technology Co., Ltd. v.RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-01406
RAI Strategic Holdings seeks Director Review to vacate the PTAB’s institution of an IPR against Kangvape’s disposable vaporizer patent, arguing that a parallel ITC proceeding should preclude institution under the Fintiv factors.
patent · Jun 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01407
Court decision.
patent terminated or settled · Jun 9, 2024
Quotient Technology, LLC et al. v.Intelligent Clearing Network Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-01323
Quotient Technology and Inmar Brand Solutions have jointly moved to terminate the IPR over U.S. Patent 9,070,133 after reaching a confidential settlement and license agreement. The Board is asked to dismiss the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. § 317.
patent · Jun 9, 2024
POSCO Co., Ltd. et al. v.ARCELORMITTAL
· IPR2024-01377
ArcelorMittal and POSCO are engaged in Director Review proceedings for two IPRs. The Board has limited the petitioner’s response to five pages and barred new evidence. A deadline of five business days has been set for filing.
patent terminated or settled · Jun 9, 2024
NormShield Inc. (d/b/a Black Kite Inc.) v.BitSight Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2024-01394
NormShield and BitSight reached a confidential settlement, prompting the PTAB to terminate four related IPRs before any trial was instituted.
patent terminated or settled · Jun 9, 2024
NormShield Inc. (d/b/a Black Kite Inc.) v.BitSight Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2024-01393
NormShield and BitSight settled their IPR dispute before trial, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding and keep the settlement confidential.
patent · Jun 9, 2024
NormShield Inc. (d/b/a Black Kite Inc.) v.BitSight Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2024-01393
NormShield and BitSight have jointly moved to terminate IPR2024-01393 following a settlement agreement. The Board has not yet issued an institution decision, and the parties argue that early termination saves costs and resources.
patent · Jun 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01407
The PTAB sent an email confirming receipt of the patent owner's Director Review request and imposed a five‑page limit on the response, barred new evidence, and required filing within five business days. No additional briefing is allowed at this stage.
patent terminated or settled · Jun 9, 2024
Quotient Technology, LLC et al. v.Intelligent Clearing Network Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-01323
Quotient Technology and Intelligent Clearing Network settled their dispute over patents 9,070,133 and 9,098,855, leading the PTAB to terminate both inter partes reviews. The settlement agreement was deemed confidential business information.
patent terminated or settled · Jun 9, 2024
NormShield Inc. (d/b/a Black Kite Inc.) v.BitSight Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2024-01392
NormShield Inc. filed a motion to terminate the IPR against BitSight Technologies' patent 10805331.
patent · Jun 9, 2024
POSCO Co., Ltd. et al. v.ARCELORMITTAL
· IPR2024-01376
POSCO challenges ArcelorMittal’s steel‑related patent in IPR2024‑01376, defending the Board’s decision to institute the case. The petitioner argues the merits are strong, overlap with parallel ITC proceedings is minimal, and the Board correctly applied Fintiv factors.
patent terminated or settled · Jun 9, 2024
NormShield Inc. (d/b/a Black Kite Inc.) v.BitSight Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2024-01395
NormShield and BitSight reached a confidential settlement, leading the PTAB to terminate four inter partes review proceedings before institution.
patent · Jun 9, 2024
NormShield Inc. (d/b/a Black Kite Inc.) v.BitSight Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2024-01394
NormShield and BitSight have jointly moved to terminate IPR2024-01394 over patent 9,438,615, citing a settlement and the early stage of the proceeding.
patent terminated or settled · Jun 9, 2024
Quotient Technology, LLC et al. v.Intelligent Clearing Network Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-01324
The PTAB terminated IPR2024-01324 (patent 9,098,855) after Quotient Technology and Intelligent Clearing Network reached a settlement, filing a joint motion to end the review.
patent · Jun 9, 2024
Quotient Technology, LLC et al. v.Intelligent Clearing Network Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-01324
Quotient Technology and Inmar Brand Solutions jointly request that their settlement agreement be treated as confidential business information, invoking 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and related regulations.
patent terminated or settled · Jun 9, 2024
Quotient Technology, LLC et al. v.Intelligent Clearing Network Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-01324
Quotient Technology and Inmar Brand Solutions have entered a settlement agreement and jointly moved to terminate the pending IPR on patent 9,098,855.
patent · Jun 9, 2024
Quotient Technology, LLC et al. v.Intelligent Clearing Network Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-01323
Quotient Technology and Inmar Brand Solutions filed a joint request to keep their settlement agreement confidential under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and related regulations, asking the PTAB to restrict public access.
patent · Jun 9, 2024
NormShield Inc. (d/b/a Black Kite Inc.) v.BitSight Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2024-01394
NormShield challenges BitSight’s ’615 patent on network‑asset mapping, asserting that the claims are obvious over Longo, McNab, Maltego, Zhang, Tippett and Shull. The petition lists seven §103 grounds covering all 100 claims.
patent · Jun 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01407
Samsung has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate Headwater Research’s 9,179,359 patent covering differentiated network‑access policies for mobile devices, arguing the claims are obvious over multiple prior‑art references.
patent · Jun 9, 2024
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.Scale Video Coding LLC
· IPR2024-01371
Cisco has filed an IPR petition challenging 12 claims of the 372 Patent, arguing they are obvious over Shao‑028 and Shao‑423. The petition seeks institution and argues against discretionary denial.
patent · Jun 9, 2024
POSCO Co., Ltd. et al. v.ARCELORMITTAL
· IPR2024-01377
POSCO seeks IPR cancellation of ArcelorMittal’s hot‑stamped coated steel patent, alleging anticipation and obviousness over multiple prior‑art references.
patent · Jun 9, 2024
POSCO Co., Ltd. et al. v.ARCELORMITTAL
· IPR2024-01376
POSCO has filed an IPR petition challenging all 30 claims of ArcelorMittal’s 2021 steel‑coating patent, asserting anticipation and obviousness over multiple prior‑art references. The petition seeks cancellation of the claims and argues that discretionary denial is unwarranted.
patent · Jun 9, 2024
NormShield Inc. (d/b/a Black Kite Inc.) v.BitSight Technologies, Inc.
· IPR2024-01395
NormShield (Black Kite) has filed an IPR petition challenging BitSight's U.S. Patent 11,652,834, asserting that its claims are obvious over the Zhang patent and the McNab book. The petition lists 22 claims and argues that passive DNS enumeration techniques were well‑known before the patent's filing date.
