US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 276 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent null · Jun 14, 2024
Roku, Inc. v.VideoLabs, Inc.
· IPR2024-01023
Roku challenged VideoLabs' patent 8291236 in an IPR proceeding, alleging that the core concepts of bridging security systems were anticipated by prior art.
Petitioner argues that claims related to dynamic encryption and entitlement management are obvious over references like Russ, Robert, and Eskicioglu.
patent null · Jun 14, 2024
Intel Corporation et al. v.Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
· IPR2024-01009
Intel and others challenged Ericsson's '659 Patent, arguing that its deblocking filter equations are obvious over prior art references like Fu and Bjontegaard. The petition asserts that a Person Having Ordinary Skill in the Art would have routinely optimized the claimed coefficients using existing knowledge of high-pass filters.
patent · Jun 14, 2024
Intel Corporation et al. v.Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
· IPR2024-01008
Intel Corporation et al. filed an IPR petition challenging Ericsson's patent on deblocking filter features, asserting obviousness over various prior art references. The core arguments focus on how asymmetric decision-making and specific offset equations are routine modifications of existing video compression techniques.
patent null · Jun 14, 2024
Innoscience America, Inc. et al. v.Infineon Technologies Austria AG
· IPR2024-00975
Innoscience America challenges Infineon's patent on power semiconductor packaging, asserting obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The petitioner argues that combining known device structures with established packaging techniques renders the claimed features predictable to a Person Having Ordinary Skill in the Art.
patent instituted · Jun 14, 2024
Roku, Inc. v.VideoLabs, Inc.
· IPR2024-01026
Roku successfully petitioned to institute an IPR against VideoLabs regarding claims related to conditional access and DRM technology. The Board found sufficient evidence of anticipation (102) and obviousness (103) over prior art 'Russ' and 'Robert.'
patent instituted · Jun 14, 2024
Roku, Inc. v.VideoLabs, Inc.
· IPR2024-01025
Roku successfully petitioned for the institution of IPR against VideoLabs regarding claims related to Conditional Access and Digital Rights Management. The Board found that Petitioner's evidence sufficiently supported unpatentability under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103, advancing the dispute into the review phase.
patent instituted · Jun 14, 2024
Roku, Inc. v.VideoLabs, Inc.
· IPR2024-01023
Roku, Inc. successfully convinced the PTAB that its claims related to conditional access and DRM systems were unpatentable over prior art (Russ). The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on both anticipation (§102) and obviousness (§103), leading to institution of the IPR.
patent instituted · Jun 14, 2024
Roku, Inc. v.VideoLabs, Inc.
· IPR2024-01024
Roku, Inc. successfully convinced the PTAB to institute its challenge against VideoLabs' patent claims under 35 U.S.C. § 102 (Anticipation). The Board found sufficient support for anticipation over prior art 'Russ,' while denying institution on obviousness grounds.
patent denied · Jun 14, 2024
Intel Corporation et al. v.Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
· IPR2024-01008
The PTAB denied Intel's IPR against Ericsson, finding that the combination of prior art references did not teach or suggest the claimed limitations. The Board upheld the patent owner's position regarding the technical differences in filtering processes and failed to find a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on any challenged claim.
patent denied · Jun 14, 2024
Intel Corporation et al. v.Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
· IPR2024-01009
Intel Corporation's attempt to invalidate Ericsson's video coding patent was denied by the PTAB on obviousness grounds (103). The Board ruled that Petitioner failed to demonstrate that specific numerical coefficients in the claimed offset equations were 'result-effective variables.'
patent denied · Jun 14, 2024
Innoscience America, Inc. et al. v.Infineon Technologies Austria AG
· IPR2024-00975
The PTAB denied the institution of an IPR against Infineon's patent, finding that Innoscience failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on obviousness grounds.
patent · Jun 13, 2024
Minka Lighting, LLC v.Wangs Alliance Corporation
· IPR2024-01027
Minka Lighting and Wangs Alliance have filed a renewed joint motion to terminate IPR2024-01027 concerning patent 11028854.
patent · Jun 13, 2024
Minka Lighting, LLC v.Wangs Alliance Corporation
· IPR2024-01027
Minka Lighting, LLC and Wangs Alliance Corporation have filed a renewed joint motion to terminate IPR2024-01027 concerning patent 11028854. The motion seeks to end the inter partes review.
patent terminated or settled · Jun 13, 2024
Minka Lighting, LLC v.Wangs Alliance Corporation
· IPR2024-01027
Minka Lighting and Wangs Alliance settled their IPR dispute over a lighting patent before the trial was instituted. The Board dismissed the petition and treated the settlement agreement as confidential.
patent · Jun 13, 2024
Inari Agriculture, Inc. v.Corteva Agriscience LLC et al.
· IPR2024-01014
Corteva Agriscience seeks Director review of a PTAB decision that instituted inter‑partes review of its transgenic corn patent, arguing the Board misapplied enablement law and misread factual evidence of germplasm availability.
patent · Jun 13, 2024
Minka Lighting, LLC v.Wangs Alliance Corporation
· IPR2024-01027
Court decision.
patent · Jun 13, 2024
Minka Lighting, LLC v.Wangs Alliance Corporation
· IPR2024-01027
Court decision.
patent instituted · Jun 13, 2024
Inari Agriculture, Inc. v.Corteva Agriscience LLC et al.
· IPR2024-01014
The PTAB denied Inari Agriculture's request for Director Review of the institution decision on Corteva's patent 8,901,378, leaving the institution in place.
patent null · Jun 13, 2024
Minka Lighting, LLC v.Wangs Alliance Corporation
· IPR2024-01027
Minka Lighting, LLC filed an Inter Partes Review challenging Wangs Alliance Corporation's patent covering smart fan control systems. The petitioner asserts that the claimed combination of RF and WiFi interfaces is obvious over various prior art references. This challenge targets claims related to wireless communication in home appliances.
patent null · Jun 13, 2024
Inari Agriculture, Inc. v.Corteva Agriscience LLC et al.
· IPR2024-01014
Inari Agriculture challenged Corteva Agriscience's patent covering TC1507 plant biotechnology, arguing the claims fail enablement under 35 U.S.C. §112(a) due to missing germplasm deposits. The petitioner also asserted anticipation and obviousness over prior art (Barbour) under both §102 and §103.
patent instituted · Jun 13, 2024
Inari Agriculture, Inc. v.Corteva Agriscience LLC et al.
· IPR2024-01014
Inari Agriculture successfully petitioned to institute an IPR against Corteva Agriscience's GMO patents based on prior art from Barbour. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing regarding anticipation and obviousness over the cited publication, moving the case toward trial.
patent final · Jun 13, 2024
Inari Agriculture, Inc. v.Corteva Agriscience LLC et al.
· IPR2024-01014
The PTAB Board upheld the validity of U.S. Patent No. 8,901,378 B2 after finding that the TC1507 germplasm was publicly available prior to the application's filing date. The Board concluded that this availability satisfied priority requirements and prevented Barbour from qualifying as prior art under § 102.
patent denied · Jun 12, 2024
Phison Electronics Corporation v.Vervain, LLC
· IPR2025-00214
The PTAB denied Phison Electronics' request to institute a post‑grant review of Vervain's 11,854,612 patent covering mixed‑level NAND flash memory, finding the petitioner had not shown any claim to be unpatentable.
patent denied · Jun 12, 2024
Phison Electronics Corporation v.Vervain, LLC
· IPR2025-00214
The PTAB denied Phison Electronics' petition for post‑grant review of Vervain's NAND‑flash storage patent, finding no sufficient evidence of unpatentability under §§ 101, 103, and 112. No claim constructions were required, and the petition was dismissed without instituting a trial.
