US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 269 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent null
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al. v.Maxell, Ltd.
· IPR2024-00717
Samsung filed a Petition challenging Maxell's patent (US 11223757) on grounds of obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103). The petitioner asserts that the claimed camera delay mechanisms are predictable combinations of prior art references, including Chinn, Takahashi, and EX-V7.
patent null
Nearmap US, Inc. v.Eagle View Technologies, Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00716
Nearmap US, Inc. filed an IPR petition challenging the validity of Eagle View Technologies' patent 10671648. The petitioner asserts that the claims are anticipated or rendered obvious by prior art references including Harris and Florance. This challenge focuses on geo-temporal database indexing and querying methods.
patent null
Vicor Corporation v.Delta Electronics, Inc.
· IPR2024-00715
Vicor Corporation filed a Petition challenging key claims of Delta Electronics' patent (US 10,877,534), asserting grounds of anticipation and obviousness. The challenger argues that the claimed power supply apparatus is rendered unpatentable by various combinations of prior art references in DC-DC Converters technology.
patent instituted
Valve Corporation v.Immersion Corporation
· IPR2024-00714
Valve Corporation challenged Immersion Corporation's '907 patent, arguing that the claims are anticipated or obvious over multiple prior art references including Goldenberg and Levin. The petitioner asserted compelling evidence of unpatentability across all 20 claims based on various grounds of anticipation and obviousness.
patent instituted
Intersect ENT, Inc. et al. v.New Amsterdam, LLC
· IPR2024-00713
Intersect ENT, Inc. filed a Petition challenging all 20 claims of Medtronic's '483 Patent based on obviousness (103). The Petitioner argues that combinations of prior art references—including Watson and Schwartz—render the implantable drug delivery device unpatentable.
patent instituted
AT&T Corp. et al. v.Soto, Alexander et al.
· IPR2024-00712
AT&T Corp. et al. successfully petitioned to institute an IPR against the '754 Patent, challenging 30 claims based on obviousness (35 U.S.C. §103). The Board found strong merits in the petition, noting that the combination of prior art references was highly relevant to Passive Optical Networks (PONs).
patent null
Salvacion USA, Inc. et al. v.Trutek Corp.
· IPR2024-00711
Salvacion USA challenges the '802 Patent's claims (1, 2, 3, 8) in a Petition, asserting they are anticipated or obvious over multiple prior art references. The Petitioner argues that various references, including Chen and Baker, disclose all elements of the claimed nasal application formulations.
patent instituted
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.WellcomeMat, LLC
· IPR2024-00710
Aylo Freesites Ltd successfully petitioned to challenge WellcomeMat's patent claims regarding online video cue point management. The PTAB institution decision was based on multiple grounds of anticipation (102) and obviousness (103).
patent null
LinkedIn Corporation v.Intent IQ, LLC
· IPR2024-00709
LinkedIn Corporation filed an IPR petition challenging 22 claims of patent 10715878, arguing they are obvious over combinations of prior art. The petitioner relies heavily on Baig and Laidlaw to demonstrate the lack of inventive step in targeted advertising and device association technology.
patent null
DELL INC. et al. v.AX Wireless, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-00708
DELL INC. petitioned the PTAB challenging AX Wireless LLC's patent (11212146) on grounds of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The petitioner asserts that all ten claims are rendered obvious by either a single prior art reference (Yu) or a combination of Hansen and WWiSE.
patent instituted
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company et al. v.Cobblestone Wireless LLC
· IPR2024-00707
Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Cisco Systems successfully petitioned the PTAB, leading to the institution of an IPR against Cobblestone Wireless's '802 Patent. The petition argues that the claims are obvious over prior art standards like IEEE 802.11n D2.0 and Shearer.
patent instituted
Vicor Corporation v.Delta Electronics, Inc.
· IPR2024-00706
Vicor Corporation successfully petitioned the PTAB to challenge Delta Electronics' patent (US 10,877,534), leading to institution. The petition asserted multiple grounds of anticipation and obviousness based on combinations of prior art references like Vinciarelli-218, Zeng-014, Park, and Jun.
patent null
Vicor Corporation v.Delta Electronics, Inc.
· IPR2024-00705
Vicor Corporation challenged Delta Electronics' '263 Patent in an IPR petition, asserting that claims 1-6 are anticipated (102) and obvious (103). The petitioner relies heavily on multiple combinations of prior art references, including Vinciarelli and Zeng patents, to demonstrate unpatentability.
patent instituted
BTL Industries, Inc. v.InMode Ltd.
· IPR2024-00703
BTL Industries successfully petitioned to challenge InMode Ltd.'s patent on urogenital tissue tightening methods. The PTAB found compelling merits in the petition, leading to institution of the IPR proceedings.
patent instituted
Vicor Corporation v.Delta Electronics, Inc.
· IPR2024-00704
Vicor Corporation challenged Delta Electronics' patent (8711580) in the PTAB, arguing that the resonant converter technology is obvious based on prior art publications. The petitioner successfully secured institution under §325(d) and §314(a), advancing its challenge to the Patent Owner.
patent null
Lenovo (United States), Inc. et al. v.Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson et al.
· IPR2024-00702
Lenovo challenged Ericsson's patent on IMSI encryption technologies before the PTAB, arguing that the claims are obvious in light of prior art. The petitioner relies on combinations of Nair and Forsberg, along with 3GPP standards, to demonstrate lack of non-obviousness. This petition asserts that existing knowledge made the claimed security enhancements predictable.
patent null
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Intent IQ, LLC
· IPR2024-00701
Samsung Electronics filed a petition challenging 18 claims of Intent IQ's patent (US 10,715,878) on grounds of obviousness. The petitioner argues that the claims are predictable combinations of prior art references like Baig, Laidlaw, and Xu in the field of cross-device tracking.
patent
VIZIO, Inc. v.Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2024-00699
VIZIO challenges Multimedia Technologies' patent via an IPR petition, asserting multiple grounds of obviousness (103). The challenger combines several prior art references—including Melnychenko and Chen—to argue that the claimed metadata management features are predictable to a POSITA.
patent null
Kohler Co. v.Delta Faucet Company et al.
· IPR2024-00700
Kohler Co. challenged Delta Faucet Company's patent via IPR, arguing that the claims are obvious over various combinations of prior art references like Tseng and Tse. The petitioner presented multiple grounds based on 103, targeting nearly all claims in the patent.
patent null
Apple Inc. v.Resonant Systems, Inc.
· IPR2024-00697
Apple Inc. initiated an IPR challenge against Resonant Systems, Inc.'s patent (8093767) regarding vibration modules and haptics. The Petitioner argues that the claimed technology is obvious over various combinations of prior art references under 103.
patent instituted
Apple Inc. v.Resonant Systems, Inc.
· IPR2024-00698
Apple Inc. successfully petitioned to challenge Resonant Systems, Inc.'s patent on Linear Resonant Vibration Modules (LRVMs) at the PTAB. The petition asserts that the claimed technology is obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 based on combinations of prior art references.
patent null
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.VIDEO SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD.
· IPR2024-00695
Cisco Systems, Inc. filed a Petition challenging the validity of patent 8649426 owned by VIDEO SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD., asserting that the claims are obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The petitioner argues that prior art references Perlman and Oguz teach known solutions for reducing video encoding latency, rendering the claimed methods unpatentable.
patent null
VIZIO, Inc. v.Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2024-00696
VIZIO, Inc. filed a Petition challenging the validity of Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd.'s '174 patent claims based on obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103). The challenger argues that combining prior art references like Woods and Istvan renders the claimed user interface navigation concepts predictable to a Person Having Ordinary Skill in the Art.
patent null
2985 LLC d/b/a Mountain Voyage Co. v.The Ridge Wallet LLC
· IPR2024-00692
Mountain Voyage Co. challenges The Ridge Wallet's compact wallet patents (10791808) based on obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The Petitioner presents multiple combinations of prior art, including Kane in view of Beckley, Pelz, and Matthews, to demonstrate the claimed features are predictable.
