US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 267 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent null
Texas Instruments Incorporated v.Greenthread, LLC
· IPR2024-00772
Texas Instruments challenges the validity of a patent covering CMOS device fabrication methods on grounds of obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103). The petition asserts that the claimed graded dopant structures are anticipated or rendered obvious by various prior art combinations, including Kawagoe and Wieczorek.
patent null
Texas Instruments Incorporated v.Greenthread, LLC
· IPR2024-00771
Texas Instruments Incorporated filed a petition challenging U.S. Patent No. 8,421,195 regarding CMOS fabrication/doping profiles. The petitioner asserts that the claims are anticipated or obvious based on numerous prior art references including Onoda and Payne. This challenges the patent's validity in semiconductor device technology.
patent instituted
TikTok Inc. et al. v.Cellspin Soft, Inc.
· IPR2024-00770
TikTok Inc. challenged Cellspin Soft, Inc.'s patent (8904030) in an IPR petition, arguing the claims are obvious over combinations of prior art like Hiroishi/Takahashi and Singh129/Bluetooth. The PTAB decided to institute the proceeding based on favorable institutional factors.
patent null
TikTok Inc. et al. v.Cellspin Soft, Inc.
· IPR2024-00769
TikTok Inc. challenges the validity of Cellspin Soft's patent 9900766, alleging obviousness over various combinations of prior art references. The petition focuses heavily on combining Kahn with Bluetooth and Singh129 with Singh906 to invalidate claims related to mobile multimedia upload systems. This initial filing sets up a complex technical battleground in the PTAB.
patent instituted
TikTok Inc. et al. v.Cellspin Soft, Inc.
· IPR2024-00768
TikTok Inc. successfully petitioned for institution of its IPR against Cellspin Soft, Inc., challenging claims 1-10 on obviousness grounds (35 U.S.C. § 103). The Board found that the petitioner's stipulation regarding parallel district court litigation favored institution under Fintiv factors.
patent instituted
TikTok Inc. et al. v.Cellspin Soft, Inc.
· IPR2024-00767
TikTok Inc. challenged Cellspin Soft, Inc.'s patent (US 11659381) in a Petition, arguing that the claims are obvious over combinations of prior art references including Hiroishi, Kahn, and Bluetooth. The PTAB found sufficient grounds for institution, noting that both discretionary tests favored proceeding with the case.
patent null
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00766
Dyson challenges Omachron's surface cleaning vacuum patent (10,568,477) in an IPR, asserting that the claims are obvious under 35 U.S.C. §103. The petition relies heavily on prior art references Dimbylow/Howes and Brown/Vuijk to demonstrate obviousness across multiple claim sets.
patent null
Garmin Ltd. et al. v.Slyde Analytics, LLC
· IPR2024-00765
Garmin Ltd. challenges the validity of Clyde Analytics' '033 Patent in an IPR proceeding, asserting that all 19 claims are obvious over various combinations of prior art references. The petition details multiple grounds combining Mooring and Satoshi with additional references like Lee, Louch, and Tam to demonstrate unpatentability.
patent null
NULIDS, LLC v.BlephEx, LLC
· IPR2024-00764
NULIDS challenges BlephEx's patent (11083621) in an IPR petition, arguing that the device for ocular disorder treatment is obvious. The petitioner relies on combinations of prior art references including Grenon I, Grenon II, Nichamin, Colin, and Shabo to invalidate claims 1-6, 9-18.
patent null
Qorvo, Inc. v.Cornell Research Foundation Inc.
· IPR2024-00758
Qorvo challenges 24 claims of a semiconductor fabrication patent (7250360) in an IPR petition, asserting that the claimed epitaxial growth and nucleation processes are obvious. The petitioner relies on multiple combinations of prior art references including Urashima, Guo, Nagata, Keiper, and Manabe to demonstrate lack of novelty.
patent null
Toyota Motor Corporation et al. v.Infogation Corp.
· IPR2024-00756
Toyota Motor Corporation et al. filed an opening petition challenging the validity of Infogation Corp.'s patent (6292743), focusing on obviousness under 103. The challenge targets claims related to route guidance and ITS architecture, citing extensive prior art from government documents and international patents.
patent null
Toyota Motor Corporation et al. v.Infogation Corp.
· IPR2024-00754
Toyota Motor Corporation et al. filed an opening petition to challenge Infogation Corp.'s patent (US 10107628) in the PTAB, alleging anticipation and obviousness of navigation system claims. The petitioner asserts that prior art, particularly JP973, discloses methods for using artistic maps with coordinate transformation for destination selection.
patent null
Google LLC v.Dialect LLC
· IPR2024-00753
Google LLC filed a Petition challenging Dialect LLC's patent 7640160, arguing that Claim 12 is obvious over prior art references Kennewick and Ross. The petition asserts that combining the disclosures of these two patents renders the claimed knowledge-enhanced speech recognition engine predictable.
patent null
Google LLC v.Dialect LLC
· IPR2024-00752
Google LLC filed an IPR petition challenging U.S. Patent No. 8,849,652 held by Dialect LLC. The petitioner argues that the patent claims are obvious over prior art references, primarily Coffman and Kennewick. This challenge relates to speech recognition and conversational AI systems.
patent null
Google LLC v.Dialect LLC
· IPR2024-00751
Google LLC filed a Petition challenging Dialect LLC's patent (8447607) on grounds of obviousness and anticipation. The petition targets 15 claims related to conversational AI, arguing the technology is well-known in speech-enabled interfaces.
patent null
Google LLC v.Dialect LLC
· IPR2024-00749
Google LLC challenges Dialect LLC's patent 7693720 in an IPR proceeding, asserting that the claims are obvious over various combinations of prior art. The petition relies heavily on combining references like Coffman and Zadrozny to demonstrate that the claimed speech recognition features were conventional knowledge for a POSITA.
patent null
Google LLC v.Dialect LLC
· IPR2024-00750
Google LLC filed a petition challenging Dialect LLC's patent 9031845, arguing the claims are obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The challenge centers on whether combining existing conversational AI and distributed computing prior art renders the claimed speech-enabled vehicle functions predictable.
patent null
Google LLC v.Dialect LLC
· IPR2024-00748
Google LLC challenges Dialect LLC's U.S. Patent No. 8,015,006 B2 in a PTAB petition, arguing that the patent claims are obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The petitioner asserts that the claimed speech recognition and domain agent methods are merely predictable combinations of existing prior art references like Coffman, Kanevsky, and Zadrozny.
patent null
Google LLC v.Dialect LLC
· IPR2024-00747
Google LLC challenges Dialect LLC's patent (7502738) in an IPR proceeding, arguing that the claims are obvious over prior art. The petitioner asserts that combining references like Coffman with Kanevsky and Ronning predictably renders the claimed conversational AI features obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
patent null
Google LLC v.Dialect LLC
· IPR2024-00746
Google LLC filed an IPR challenging U.S. Patent No. 7,398,209 held by Dialect LLC, asserting that the claims are obvious over existing conversational AI prior art. The petition details multiple grounds of obviousness (Grounds 1-5), combining references like Coffman, Kanevsky, and Redfern to demonstrate predictability in speech recognition techniques.
patent null
TESLA, INC. v.Autonomous Devices, LLC
· IPR2024-00745
Tesla (Petitioner) challenged Autonomous Devices' patent in an IPR proceeding, arguing that the claims are anticipated or obvious over prior art references like Buibas and Grotmol. The Board found factors favoring institution, meaning the case will proceed to the merits phase.
patent null
CUB Elecparts Inc. v.Orange Electronic Co., Ltd.
· IPR2024-00744
CUB Elecparts Inc. initiated an IPR challenging key claims of the '064 patent related to Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems (TPMS). The petitioner argues that the claimed technology is obvious in view of prior art references, primarily Tang and Lemense, which describe similar ID updating systems.
patent null
Cala Health, Inc. v.EMKinetics, Inc.
· IPR2024-00743
Cala Health challenges EMKinetics' patent on tremor treatment using electrical stimulation, arguing that prior art references Gesotti and Burnett render all claims obvious or anticipated. The petitioner details how these older devices satisfy every limitation of the claimed apparatus and method for treating neurological conditions like tremor.
patent instituted
The Integration Group of Americas, Inc. v.SitePro, Inc.
· IPR2024-00742
The Integration Group of Americas challenges SitePro's patent (11,294,403) under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and § 103, arguing that the claims are anticipated or rendered obvious by prior art references Kahn, Almadi, and Gutierrez. The PTAB has instituted the case, allowing the merits of the anticipation and obviousness arguments to proceed.
