US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 261 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent instituted
Google LLC v.138 East LCD Advancements Limited et al.
· IPR2024-00958
Google LLC challenges U.S. Patent No. 8,482,638 based on obviousness (103) using prior art references Parulski and Safonov. The petitioner argues that combining these references would motivate POSITAs to apply conventional image processing techniques like alpha blending. This petition has been instituted by the PTAB.
patent instituted
Google LLC v.138 East LCD Advancements Limited et al.
· IPR2024-00957
Google LLC has initiated an Inter Partes Review (IPR) challenging the validity of patent 7454056, which covers color balance correction and face detection technologies. The Petitioner argues that the claims are obvious over various combinations of prior art references, including Yano, Schroder, Kuwata, and Nakamura. This challenge targets core image processing methods used in digital imaging.
patent null
Google LLC v.138 East LCD Advancements Limited et al.
· IPR2024-00956
Google LLC has challenged a patent covering image enhancement and object detection methods before the PTAB, arguing that the claims are obvious over various combinations of prior art. The petitioner asserts that combining known face detection techniques with existing image processing apparatuses renders all 12 claimed methods unpatentable under Section 103. This challenge is part of ongoing litigation involving Google LLC in district court.
patent instituted
Google LLC v.138 East LCD Advancements Limited et al.
· IPR2024-00955
Google LLC successfully petitioned to challenge a patent covering image processing techniques, leading the PTAB to institute proceedings. The petitioner argues that the claimed features are obvious combinations of prior art references like Luo-250.
patent
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.Portsmouth Network Corporation
· IPR2024-00954
Cisco Systems has filed an IPR petition challenging the validity of Portsmouth Network Corporation's '637 Patent claims related to fast link failover systems for network communication failures. The petitioner asserts that the invention is obvious over various combinations of prior art references, primarily Mitchell.
patent null
SHENZHEN ROOT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. et al. v.Chiaro Technology Ltd.
· IPR2024-00953
Shenzhen Root Technology Co., Ltd. has filed a Petition challenging U.S. Patent No. 11,413,380 held by Chiaro Technology Ltd. The challenge centers on obviousness (Section 103), arguing that the claimed features of the breast pump are combinations of existing prior art references like Chang, Weber, and Guthrie.
patent
Cambridge Mobile Telematics, Inc. v.Sfara, Inc.
· IPR2024-00952
Cambridge Mobile Telematics challenged 18 of Sfara, Inc.'s crash detection claims in an IPR petition, arguing they are rendered obvious by prior art references Green and Wright. The petitioner asserts that combining existing sensor technologies with methods for logging driving information allows a Person Having Ordinary Skill in the Art (POSITA) to achieve the claimed features.
patent null
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.Active Wireless Technologies LLC
· IPR2024-00951
Ericsson filed a Petition challenging Active Wireless Technologies' patent on 5G HARQ-ACK feedback mechanisms. They assert that the claims are obvious over prior art references Wang and Yang under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The petition also argues against discretionary denial of institution.
patent null
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00950
Dyson challenges Omachron's vacuum cleaner patents in PTAB, arguing that the claims are obvious based on combinations of prior art references. The petition asserts that existing technology renders every claim predictable to a Person Having Ordinary Skill in the Art.
patent
Ascend Elements, Inc. v.Duesenfeld GmbH
· IPR2024-00948
Ascend Elements challenges Duesenfeld GmbH's battery recycling patent (11050097) by asserting that the claims are obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The petitioner argues that combining prior art references, such as Hanisch with Meador and Shin, renders the claimed features predictable for a Person of Ordinary Skill in the Art.
patent
T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al. v.Cobblestone Wireless, LLC
· IPR2024-00946
T-Mobile USA challenges Cobblestone Wireless's '802 patent, arguing that its claims covering multi-carrier transmission are obvious in light of existing prior art. The petitioner asserts that known techniques and combinations of references render the patented technology predictable.
patent null
Google LLC et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-00945
Google and others filed a Petition challenging the validity of Headwater Research LLC's patent on wireless end-user device traffic control policies. The challenge asserts that the claimed features are obvious based on combinations of prior art references, including Rao, Montemurro, Freund, and Araujo.
patent null
Google LLC et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-00944
Google filed a Petition for Inter Partes Review against Headwater Research LLC's patent covering network capacity management and traffic prioritization. The petition asserts that the claims are anticipated or rendered obvious by combinations of prior art references, including Rao, Fadell, and Freund.
patent
Google LLC et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-00943
This petition challenges patent validity under 35 U.S.C. § 103, asserting that the claimed invention is obvious in light of prior art references Rao and Fadell. The challenge covers a broad scope of claims ranging from Claim 1 to Claim 159.
patent null
Google LLC et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-00942
A coalition of tech giants and wireless carriers, including Google LLC and Verizon Wireless, has filed an IPR petition against Headwater Research's '541 patent. The petitioners challenge the validity based on anticipation (102) and obviousness (103), citing combinations of prior art references.
patent null
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00941
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. filed a petition challenging U.S. Patent No. 11,991,234 held by DISH Technologies L.L.C., asserting that the claims covering adaptive bitrate streaming are obvious over existing prior art. The petitioner argues that combinations of references like Ogdon and Allen, supplemented by Klements and Gamble, teach every limitation of the challenged claims.
patent null
Aylo Freesites Ltd et al. v.DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al.
· IPR2024-00940
Petitioner Aylo Freesites Ltd challenges 20 claims of DISH Technologies L.L.C.'s '234 Patent based on obviousness (103). The challenge relies heavily on combining prior art references, particularly Leaning, Klements, and Gamble, to show that the adaptive bitrate content streaming technology was already known.
patent null
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00938
Dyson challenged a patent covering vacuum cleaner apparatus, arguing that all 15 claims are obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The petition relies heavily on combining well-known configurations from references like Butler, Peng, and Lehmann to demonstrate predictable results in cleaning device design.
patent
Duration Media v.Rich Media Club LLC
· IPR2024-00937
Duration Media LLC challenged Rich Media Club LLC's patents, asserting that claims 1-14 related to viewability measurement are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The petition argues that the claimed technology is obvious when combining prior art references like Koeppel and Seo.
patent
Texas Instruments Incorporated v.ParkerVision, Inc.
· IPR2024-00936
Texas Instruments Incorporated initiated an IPR challenging ParkerVision's frequency down-conversion receiver claims based on obviousness (103). The petitioner asserts that various combinations of prior art references, including Tayloe and Macnally, render the claimed apparatus obvious.
patent null
Texas Instruments Incorporated v.ParkerVision, Inc.
· IPR2024-00935
Texas Instruments filed a Petition challenging ParkerVision's patent claims related to RF signal processing and down-conversion. The core argument centers on obviousness (35 U.S.C. §103), asserting that the claimed methods are merely combinations of known prior art techniques.
patent null
Texas Instruments Incorporated v.ParkerVision, Inc.
· IPR2024-00934
Texas Instruments Incorporated filed an IPR challenging ParkerVision's down-converter patent (7496342). The petition asserts that claims are obvious over prior art references, including DeMaw and Macnally. This challenge targets key technology in wireless communications.
patent null
FormFactor, Inc. v.Technoprobe S.p.A.
· IPR2024-00933
FormFactor challenges Technoprobe's '885 patent via an IPR, asserting that the claims are anticipated and obvious over prior art references. The petitioner relies heavily on reference Kim, combined with Schmid, Fan, Bross, and a 2016 SWTest Presentation to invalidate multiple claims related to probe card design.
patent null
Abbott Laboratories v.Newtonoid Technologies, LLC
· IPR2024-00932
Abbott Laboratories filed a Petition challenging Newtonoid Technologies' patent claims based on obviousness. The petitioner argues that combining known technologies, such as dynamic barcodes and environmental monitoring, renders the claims unpatentable over multiple prior art references. This challenge targets 18 specific claims related to stimuli-responsive labels.
