US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 257 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent
Luxottica of America Inc. et al. v.E-Vision Optics, LLC
· IPR2024-01071
Luxottica of America Inc. filed a petition challenging E-Vision Optics' patent claims related to smart eyewear, asserting that the patents are invalid due to obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The petitioner argues that known components and predictable arrangements disclosed in prior art references render nearly all claims unpatentable.
patent
Luxottica of America Inc. et al. v.E-Vision Optics, LLC
· IPR2024-01070
Luxottica of America Inc. has filed an Inter Partes Review petition challenging E-Vision Optics, LLC's patent covering smart eyewear with integrated electronics. The petitioner asserts that various combinations of prior art references render the challenged claims invalid under both anticipation (102) and obviousness (103).
patent null
Luxottica of America Inc. et al. v.E-Vision Optics, LLC
· IPR2024-01069
Luxottica has filed an IPR challenging 21 claims of E-Vision Optics' patent regarding embedded electronics in eyewear frames. The petitioner argues that these claims are obvious over decades-old prior art, which discloses generic components and known electronic techniques.
patent null
NXP USA, INC. et al. v.ParkerVision, Inc.
· IPR2024-01068
NXP USA, INC. has filed a Petition challenging 36 claims of ParkerVision's patent (9118528) based on obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The petitioner argues that the claimed frequency down-conversion receiver structures are rendered obvious by combining various prior art references, including Tayloe and TI Datasheet.
patent instituted
smaXtec Inc. et al. v.ST Reproductive Technologies, LLC
· IPR2024-01067
smaXtec Inc. successfully petitioned to challenge a key patent held by ST Reproductive Technologies, LLC at the PTAB. The petition asserts seven grounds of invalidity based on anticipation and obviousness using various prior art references.
patent instituted
NXP USA, INC. et al. v.ParkerVision, Inc.
· IPR2024-01066
NXP USA filed an IPR challenging ParkerVision's patent claims, arguing that Claim 14 is unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The petitioner asserts obviousness based on combinations of prior art references related to signal processing and RF down-conversion.
patent null
Roku, Inc. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01058
Roku challenges a patent covering content identification and playback stream analysis, arguing the claims are obvious over multiple combinations of prior art references. The petitioner asserts that various combinations render the claimed methods predictable to a Person Having Ordinary Skill in the Art.
patent null
Roku, Inc. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01057
Roku, Inc. has filed an IPR challenging the validity of the '848 patent owned by Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC. The challenge centers on obviousness (103), arguing that specific combinations of prior art references render the claims unpatentable.
patent null
Roku, Inc. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01056
Roku challenges the validity of Patent '896, asserting that its claims related to audience behavior analysis are obvious over prior art references. The petition focuses on combining elements from Feininger, Ramaswamy, and Conklin to demonstrate lack of novelty.
patent null
Roku, Inc. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01055
Roku, Inc. has filed an IPR petition challenging a patent covering Audio/Video Fingerprinting and Playback Stream Analysis. The petitioner asserts that the challenged claims are obvious over multiple combinations of prior art references.
patent null
Roku, Inc. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01054
Roku challenges U.S. Patent No. 8510768, owned by Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC, over methods for audio content identification and fingerprinting. The petitioner argues that the challenged claims are obvious combinations of prior art references involving signal processing techniques.
patent
Roku, Inc. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01053
Roku challenges a patent held by Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC in an IPR proceeding, asserting that the challenged claims related to audience measurement are obvious over prior art.
Petitioner Roku relies on combinations of references like Feininger and Ramaswamy/Conklin to demonstrate predictable results in media playback analysis.
patent null
Arashi Vision Inc. (d/b/a Insta360) v.GoPro, Inc.
· IPR2024-01052
Arashi Vision (Insta360) has filed a Petition challenging key claims of GoPro's patent covering horizon leveling and video stabilization techniques. The petitioner asserts that these claims are obvious over various combinations of prior art references, including Thomason, Pacurariu, Watanabe, Voss, and Derbanne.
patent null
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01051
Samsung Electronics is challenging U.S. Patent No. 8,639,811 by asserting that the claimed network policy management features are obvious over various combinations of prior art references. The petitioner argues that combining known technologies for bandwidth control and prioritization would have been routine knowledge to a POSITA.
patent
Apple Inc. v.S.M.R Innovations LTD et al.
· IPR2024-01050
Apple Inc. filed a Petition challenging patent 7969990 held by S.M.R Innovations LTD, asserting that the claimed mobile device connectivity and data rerouting technology is obvious over prior art. The challenge focuses on combining references like Chihara, BluetoothSpec, Everett, and Chang to demonstrate lack of inventive step.
patent null
Apple Inc. v.S.M.R Innovations LTD et al.
· IPR2024-01049
Apple Inc. filed a petition challenging several claims of S.M.R Innovations LTD et al.'s patent related to streaming data routing and Bluetooth connectivity. The petitioner argues that the challenged claims are obvious over a combination of prior art references, including Chihara, BluetoothSpec, Everett, and Chang. This challenge is part of ongoing litigation between the parties.
patent
Apple Inc. v.S.M.R Innovations LTD et al.
· IPR2024-01048
Apple Inc. has filed a petition challenging U.S. Patent No. 10,547,648, asserting that its claims related to media routing and streaming are obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The petitioner relies on multiple combinations of prior art references, including Zhang, Fillebrown, Pasanen, and Skinner, to demonstrate unpatentability.
patent null
Apple Inc. v.S.M.R Innovations LTD et al.
· IPR2024-01047
Apple Inc. filed an Inter Partes Review challenging U.S. Patent No. 9,699,223, arguing that the claims are obvious over various combinations of prior art in media streaming and routing. The petition focuses on combining Zhang's framework with Moore's concepts to enable enhanced user control and device selection capabilities.
patent mixed - some claims cancelled, some upheld
Sony Corporation v.Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC
· IPR2024-01046
Sony Corporation successfully challenged Optimum Imaging Technologies LLC's '266 patent, arguing the claims were obvious over prior art references like Niikawa and Watanabe-JP. The Board agreed to institute review, resulting in the cancellation of several key claims related to in-camera image processing.
patent
VusionGroup SA et al. v.Hanshow Technology Co., Ltd.
· IPR2024-01045
VusionGroup SA et al. filed a Petition for Inter Partes Review against Hanshow Technology Co., Ltd.'s patent, challenging 21 claims related to retail inventory management. The petition asserts that the claimed technology is obvious over various combinations of prior art references using computer vision techniques.
patent null
NPX USA, Inc. et al. v.Bell Northern Research, LLC
· IPR2024-01044
NPX USA challenges Bell Northern Research's patent covering ELTS technology under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The petitioner argues that combining various prior art references, including Jones and Zelst/Boer, renders the claimed features obvious in the context of WiFi standards. This IPR targets 19 claims related to OFDM training sequences.
patent null
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy
· IPR2024-01043
Amazon challenged Nokia's patent (U.S. Patent No. 7,689,939) before the PTAB, arguing that claims related to mobile device user interfaces are obvious under Section 103. The challenger asserts that combining prior art teachings regarding limited access and UI enhancements results in predictable features.
patent null
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01042
Verizon Wireless filed an IPR petition challenging 40 claims of a network service plan provisioning system, asserting obviousness over prior art references Poh, Maes, and Burnett. The challenge centers on whether combining these existing technologies would motivate the claimed dynamic policy updates in wireless networks.
patent instituted
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01041
Petitioner Cellco/Verizon Wireless has filed an IPR challenging U.S. Patent No. 8,924,543 concerning network service plan provisioning. The challenge asserts that the claims are obvious over prior art references Poh and Maes under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Given the strong merits demonstrated by the petition, the PTAB has instituted the review proceedings.
