US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 257 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent terminated or settled · Jul 17, 2024
Nike, Inc. v.SherryWear, LLC
· IPR2024-01123
Nike and SherryWear settled their inter partes review of U.S. Patent 9,295,288. The Board terminated the IPR by joint motion, treating the settlement agreement as confidential.
patent · Jul 17, 2024
Nike, Inc. v.SherryWear, LLC
· IPR2024-01122
Nike and SherryWear have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 9,289,016 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review. The motion relies on 35 U.S.C. § 317 to end the proceeding before a final decision is issued.
patent null · Jul 17, 2024
Dr. Squatch, LLC v.The Procter & Gamble Company
· IPR2024-01174
Dr. Squatch challenged The Procter & Gamble Company’s '706 Patent, arguing that its claims regarding natural deodorants are unpatentable. The petitioner relies on multiple grounds of anticipation and obviousness (35 U.S.C. §§ 102/103). These challenges focus on the use of basic concepts and ingredient combinations found in existing prior art.
patent null · Jul 17, 2024
Dr. Squatch, LLC v.The Procter & Gamble Company
· IPR2024-01173
Dr. Squatch, LLC has filed a petition challenging The Procter & Gamble Company's deodorant patent (10905647) on grounds of anticipation and obviousness. The petitioner argues that the claimed stick compositions merely recite known ingredients and consumer preferences within the cosmetics industry.
patent null · Jul 17, 2024
At&T Enterprises, LLC et al. v.Innovative Sonic Limited
· IPR2024-01145
Major telecommunications companies, including AT&T, T-Mobile, Ericsson, and Nokia, have filed a petition challenging the validity of a cellular network patent (9560559). The challengers argue that the patented claims are anticipated or obvious based on combinations of prior art references like Centonza and industry standards.
patent null · Jul 17, 2024
Nike, Inc. v.SherryWear, LLC
· IPR2024-01129
Nike challenges SherryWear's sports bra patent (10869510) based on obviousness over prior art references including Spagna, Rose, and Glass. The petitioner argues that a Person Having Ordinary Skill in the Art would find it obvious to modify existing designs using common knowledge regarding materials and pocket function.
patent · Jul 17, 2024
Nike, Inc. v.SherryWear, LLC
· IPR2024-01128
Nike, Inc. initiated an Inter Partes Review challenging U.S. Patent No. 10,244,800 held by SherryWear, LLC. The core challenge is obviousness over multiple prior art references including Spagna, Rose, and Glass. This petition also raises issues regarding the priority date entitlement of the challenged claims.
patent null · Jul 17, 2024
Nike, Inc. v.SherryWear, LLC
· IPR2024-01127
Nike challenges U.S. Patent No. 10,219,551 held by SherryWear, LLC in a PTAB Petition. The petitioner asserts that the claimed pocketed bra designs are obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 based on prior art references like Vidai and Handras.
patent null · Jul 17, 2024
Nike, Inc. v.SherryWear, LLC
· IPR2024-01126
Nike has filed a petition to challenge U.S. Patent No. 10,219,550 held by SherryWear, LLC, arguing that the claims related to bra pockets are obvious.
patent null · Jul 17, 2024
Nike, Inc. v.SherryWear, LLC et al.
· IPR2024-01125
Nike challenges SherryWear’s patent (9,808,036) in an IPR proceeding, arguing that the claimed pocket bra designs are obvious over existing prior art references. The petition asserts unpatentability under 35 U.S.C. § 103 using combinations of references like Barg, York, and Pintor. This challenge is part of ongoing litigation between the two companies.
patent instituted · Jul 17, 2024
Nike, Inc. v.SherryWear, LLC
· IPR2024-01124
Nike challenged SherryWear's patented pocketed bra design (U.S. 9,723,878) at the PTAB, arguing obviousness over prior art references Vidai and Handras in view of Spagna. The Board found that Nike met its burden to show a reasonably strong case for unpatentability.
patent null · Jul 17, 2024
Nike, Inc. v.SherryWear, LLC
· IPR2024-01123
Nike challenged U.S. Patent No. 9,295,288 held by SherryWear regarding intimate apparel design features. The petitioner argues that the claimed bra elements are obvious combinations of prior art references like Barg and York. This challenge tests the boundaries of routine design choices in the apparel industry.
patent · Jul 17, 2024
Nike, Inc. v.SherryWear, LLC
· IPR2024-01123
Nike filed a PTAB petition challenging the validity of SherryWear's bra pocket system claims, asserting obviousness over combinations of prior art references like Barg and Pintor. The petitioner argues that these combinations render the claimed features predictable to a Person Having Ordinary Skill in the Art (POSA).
patent null · Jul 17, 2024
Nike, Inc. v.SherryWear, LLC
· IPR2024-01122
Nike has filed a Petition challenging SherryWear's U.S. Patent No. 9,289,016 in an IPR proceeding, asserting that the bra design claims are obvious.
patent null · Jul 17, 2024
MPL Brands NV, Inc. v.BuzzBallz, LLC
· IPR2024-01098
MPL Brands NV challenges BuzzBallz's '904 patent covering beverage containers, asserting claims 1-6 are obvious or anticipated by prior art like Kick and Ackermann/Kaminski combinations. The petition also raises issues regarding improper introduction of volume limitations during prosecution.
patent null · Jul 17, 2024
Roku, Inc. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01058
Roku challenges a patent covering content identification and playback stream analysis, arguing the claims are obvious over multiple combinations of prior art references. The petitioner asserts that various combinations render the claimed methods predictable to a Person Having Ordinary Skill in the Art.
patent null · Jul 17, 2024
Roku, Inc. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01055
Roku, Inc. has filed an IPR petition challenging a patent covering Audio/Video Fingerprinting and Playback Stream Analysis. The petitioner asserts that the challenged claims are obvious over multiple combinations of prior art references.
patent instituted · Jul 17, 2024
Dr. Squatch, LLC v.The Procter & Gamble Company
· IPR2024-01174
The PTAB decided to institute IPR proceedings against a deodorant/antiperspirant patent, finding that Petitioner demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on several key claims. The decision validates the use of multiple prior art references in personal care compositions for obviousness challenges.
patent instituted · Jul 17, 2024
Dr. Squatch, LLC v.The Procter & Gamble Company
· IPR2024-01173
Dr. Squatch, LLC successfully challenged The Procter & Gamble Company's patent claims in an IPR proceeding, demonstrating a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on unpatentability for key deodorant compositions. The Board found that prior art references taught sufficient motivation to combine elements across different personal care fields.
patent denied · Jul 17, 2024
At&T Enterprises, LLC et al. v.Innovative Sonic Limited
· IPR2024-01145
The PTAB denied the petition to invalidate claims related to small cell enhancements, finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing. The Board rejected arguments based on anticipation and obviousness, particularly concerning technical limitations in resource scheduling.
patent instituted · Jul 17, 2024
Nike, Inc. v.SherryWear, LLC
· IPR2024-01129
Nike successfully petitioned to challenge seven claims of SherryWear's patent based on obviousness over prior art references including Spagna and Rose. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of success regarding claim 1, leading to the institution of the IPR.
patent instituted · Jul 17, 2024
Nike, Inc. v.SherryWear, LLC
· IPR2024-01128
Nike successfully moved forward in its IPR against SherryWear's '800 patent, with the PTAB instituting the case on multiple grounds of obviousness (35 U.S.C. § 103). The Board found sufficient evidence to support a reasonable likelihood of prevailing for all six challenged claims.
patent instituted · Jul 17, 2024
Nike, Inc. v.SherryWear, LLC
· IPR2024-01127
Nike successfully challenged SherryWear's pocketed bra patent (10219551) before the PTAB. The Board found grounds for institution, agreeing with Nike that various claims were obvious over prior art references like Handras and Spagna. This sets a strong precedent against the validity of apparel patents in this niche market.
patent instituted · Jul 17, 2024
Nike, Inc. v.SherryWear, LLC
· IPR2024-01126
Nike successfully secured institution for all 14 claims of SherryWear's patent, overcoming the Patent Owner's attempt at discretionary denial. The Board found that Nike presented a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on Claim 1 over Barg and Pintor, leading to an IPR trial.
