US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 255 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent instituted · Jul 22, 2024
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. et al. v.Stellar, LLC
· IPR2024-01205
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. successfully convinced the PTAB to institute IPR proceedings against Stellar, LLC regarding patent 7593034. The Board found a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability under 35 U.S.C. § 103 based on combinations of prior art references like Yerazunis and Fiore. This moves the dispute into substantive trial phase.
patent denied · Jul 22, 2024
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. et al. v.Stellar, LLC
· IPR2024-01205
The Director denied institution of IPRs in four related proceedings involving Motorola Solutions and Stellar, citing the substantial investment already made in a parallel district court infringement trial.
patent instituted · Jul 22, 2024
DR. FALK PHARMA GMBH v.Ellodi Pharmaceuticals LP
· IPR2024-01197
DR. FALK PHARMA GMBH challenged Ellodi Pharmaceuticals LP's '729 patent, asserting obviousness of claims related to orally disintegrating corticosteroids for GI tract inflammation. The PTAB declined to deny the petition, finding that additional evidence warranted reconsideration of prior art references like Dohil and FDA Guidance.
patent · Jul 19, 2024
Solaris Oilfield Site Services Operating, LLC et al. v.Masaba, Inc.
· IPR2024-01179
Masaba seeks Director review of the PTAB’s Final Written Decision that upheld an obviousness finding on its aggregate transferring system patent. The patent owner contends the Board ignored critical real‑world evidence and mis‑qualified the petitioner’s expert.
patent terminated or settled · Jul 19, 2024
Honda Motor Co., Ltd. et al. v.Infogation Corp.
· IPR2024-01160
Honda and Infogation settled their dispute, prompting the PTAB to dismiss IPR2024-01160 before institution. The Board granted the joint motion to dismiss and ordered the settlement kept confidential.
patent terminated or settled · Jul 19, 2024
Honda Motor Co., Ltd. et al. v.Infogation Corp.
· IPR2024-01160
Honda and Infogation settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 6,292,743, prompting a joint motion to dismiss the pending IPR before it was instituted.
patent · Jul 19, 2024
Solaris Oilfield Site Services Operating, LLC et al. v.Masaba, Inc.
· IPR2024-01179
Solaris defends the PTAB's finding that Masaba’s conveyor patent is obvious, emphasizing lack of nexus and proper expert testimony. The response rebuts Masaba’s secondary‑considerations arguments and procedural objections.
patent · Jul 19, 2024
3D Diagnostix, Inc. v.Watson Guide IP, LLC
· PGR2024-00040
3D Diagnostix petitions the PTAB to invalidate 13 claims of Watson Guide IP’s dental guide patent, alleging lack of written description, indefiniteness, and obviousness over multiple prior‑art references.
patent null · Jul 19, 2024
Canadian Solar Inc. et al. v.Maxeon Solar Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2024-01194
Canadian Solar Inc. has initiated an Inter Partes Review (IPR) challenging Maxeon Solar Pte. Ltd.'s patent on back-contact solar cell technology. The petitioner argues that key claims are unpatentable due to obviousness when combining the patented structure with various prior art references.
patent null · Jul 19, 2024
Reolink Innovation Inc. et al. v.THROUGH TEK TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD. et al.
· IPR2024-01193
Petitioner Reolink Innovation Inc. challenged U.S. Patent No. 10,602,448 covering remote wakeup systems in a PTAB petition. The challenge asserts that the patent is unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. §102 and §103 based on various combinations of prior art references (Zhang, Zill, Liu).
patent · Jul 19, 2024
Reolink Innovation Inc. et al. v.THROUGH TEK TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD. et al.
· IPR2024-01192
Reolink Innovation Inc. has filed an IPR Petition challenging patents held by THROUGH TEK TECHNOLOGY regarding Peer-to-Peer (P2P) connectivity for video streaming. The petitioner argues that the challenged claims are obvious over various combinations of prior art, including Lorex Manual and Kim941.
patent instituted · Jul 19, 2024
Solaris Oilfield Site Services Operating, LLC et al. v.Masaba, Inc.
· IPR2024-01179
Petitioners successfully achieved institution in this IPR challenging Masaba, Inc.'s aggregate transfer apparatus patent (11780689). The petition asserts that the claimed system is obvious under 35 U.S.C. §103 based on predictable combinations of various prior art references.
patent null · Jul 19, 2024
Honda Motor Co., Ltd. et al. v.Infogation Corp.
· IPR2024-01160
Honda Motor Co., Ltd. challenged Infogation Corp.'s patent 6292743, arguing that the claimed use of non-proprietary, natural language formats for routes was obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The Petitioner relies on various prior art references, including McGrath and Knockeart, to demonstrate that a Person Having Ordinary Skill in the Art would have been motivated to make simple modifications.
patent · Jul 19, 2024
AT&T Enterprises, LLC et al. v.Innovative Sonic Limited
· IPR2024-01143
Major wireless carriers, including AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon, have filed an IPR petition challenging the validity of a patent related to Radio Link Control (RLC) protocols. Petitioners argue that the challenged claims are anticipated or rendered obvious by existing 3GPP communication standards. The core dispute centers on whether prior art correctly detects protocol errors in wireless transmissions.
patent instituted · Jul 19, 2024
3D Diagnostix, Inc. v.Watson Guide IP, LLC
· PGR2024-00040
3D Diagnostix successfully petitioned to institute IPR against Watson Guide IP regarding dental prosthesis claims under 103. The Board found sufficient evidence of obviousness, despite disputes over claim language and prior art interpretation.
patent instituted · Jul 19, 2024
Canadian Solar Inc. et al. v.Maxeon Solar Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2024-01194
Canadian Solar Inc. successfully challenged claims of the '315 patent, leading to institution of the IPR proceedings. The challenge focused on obviousness over combinations of prior art in solar cell fabrication techniques.
patent instituted · Jul 19, 2024
Reolink Innovation Inc. et al. v.THROUGH TEK TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD. et al.
· IPR2024-01193
Reolink Innovation Inc. challenged the validity of a network communications patent (US 10602448) based on anticipation and obviousness grounds. The PTAB issued an institution decision, finding sufficient likelihood for petitioner to prevail on at least one claim.
patent instituted · Jul 19, 2024
Reolink Innovation Inc. et al. v.THROUGH TEK TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD. et al.
· IPR2024-01192
The PTAB granted institution of IPR for Reolink Innovation Inc., finding a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on obviousness grounds (35 U.S.C. § 103). The challenge targets core P2P networking and video streaming claims against THROUGHTEK CO., LTD.'s patent.
patent instituted · Jul 19, 2024
Solaris Oilfield Site Services Operating, LLC et al. v.Masaba, Inc.
· IPR2024-01179
The PTAB granted institution of IPR for Solaris against Masaba's aggregate handling patent (11780689), finding a reasonable likelihood that key claims are obvious over Waldner and Dynatek.
patent denied · Jul 19, 2024
AT&T Enterprises, LLC et al. v.Innovative Sonic Limited
· IPR2024-01143
The PTAB denied AT&T and other petitioners' challenges to Innovative Sonic Limited's wireless patent, finding no reasonable likelihood of success. The Board rejected arguments that 3GPP specifications anticipated or rendered obvious the claimed error handling method.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Jul 19, 2024
3D Diagnostix, Inc. v.Watson Guide IP, LLC
· PGR2024-00040
The PTAB found that all challenged claims were obvious over various combinations of prior art references, including Llop '126 and Sichuan. The Board determined there was a clear motivation for a person skilled in the art to combine these references to achieve the claimed invention.
patent final · Jul 19, 2024
Canadian Solar Inc. et al. v.Maxeon Solar Pte. Ltd.
· IPR2024-01194
The PTAB issued a Final Written Decision denying the Petitioner's arguments that claims 10-16 and 19 were unpatentable. The Board found insufficient motivation in the prior art to combine references, particularly regarding optimal dopant concentrations for solar cell fabrication techniques.
patent Final Written Decision · Jul 19, 2024
Reolink Innovation Inc. et al. v.THROUGH TEK TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD. et al.
· IPR2024-01192
The Board issued a Final Written Decision finding that the patent claims were unpatentable over various combinations of prior art references. Specifically, Claim 1 and dependent claims were found obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 using combinations like the Lorex Manual and Kim '941. This decision significantly weakens the Patent Owner's position in this IPR proceeding.
patent Final Written Decision · Jul 19, 2024
Reolink Innovation Inc. et al. v.THROUGH TEK TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD. et al.
· IPR2024-01193
The Board issued a Final Written Decision finding all 19 challenged claims unpatentable over prior art combinations. The Petitioner successfully demonstrated anticipation by Zhang (Sec. 102) and obviousness using combinations of Zhang/Zill and Liu/Zhang (Sec. 103).
