US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 250 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01350
Samsung seeks IPR review of U.S. Patent 10,719,848 covering media‑measurement methods, arguing all 15 claims are obvious over prior art and lack written‑description support for video‑data features.
patent
Google LLC v.--
· IPR2024-01318
Google has filed a petition for inter partes review of Proxense’s ’042 patent, asserting that the claims are obvious over several prior‑art references and that discretionary denial is not justified.
patent
Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al. v.Stellar, LLC
· IPR2024-01284
Motorola Solutions has filed a petition for inter‑partes review of Stellar’s U.S. Pat. 8,310,540, asserting that all 19 claims are obvious over multiple prior‑art references. The petition adopts the patent owner’s claim constructions and cites extensive prior‑art combinations to seek cancellation of the entire patent.
patent
Quotient Technology, LLC et al. v.Intelligent Clearing Network Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-01325
Quotient Technology has petitioned the PTAB to institute an IPR against U.S. Patent 10,846,729, seeking cancellation of all 20 claims as obvious over prior‑art coupon systems. The petition argues that the Board should not deny institution under discretionary standards.
patent
Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al. v.Stellar, LLC
· IPR2024-01314
Motorola Solutions has filed an IPR petition challenging Stellar’s U.S. Patent 10,965,910 covering loop‑recording surveillance devices. The petition alleges obviousness over several pre‑AIA references and requests cancellation of claims 1‑20.
patent
BOE Technology Group Co., LTD v.Optronic Sciences, LLC
· IPR2024-01315
BOE Technology has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of claims 1 and 3 of Optronic Sciences’ OLED pixel patent, arguing obviousness over Anzai and its combination with Yamazaki and Yamada. The petition also argues that discretionary denial is not warranted.
patent
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.Croga Innovations Ltd.
· IPR2024-01282
Cisco has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate claims 1 and 2 of Croga Innovations’ VoIP codec‑switching patent, arguing obviousness over multiple prior‑art references and asserting that discretionary denial is unwarranted.
patent
Microsoft Corporation v.Proxense, LLC
· IPR2024-01328
Microsoft has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate 15 claims of Proxense’s ’905 biometric authentication patent, arguing obviousness over prior art Ludtke and Kon and opposing discretionary denial.
patent
Genius Sports Ltd. v.SportsCastr Inc.
· IPR2024-01307
Genius Sports has filed a petition to invalidate SportsCastr’s U.S. Patent 10,805,687 covering live‑score overlay on video streams. The petition asserts obviousness over Ellis, Herzog, and Spivey references and asks the Board to institute the IPR.
patent
Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al. v.Stellar, LLC
· IPR2024-01285
Motorola Solutions filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 18 claims of Stellar’s ’752 surveillance‑camera patent, asserting obviousness over several prior‑art references. The petition details extensive claim‑by‑claim analysis and cites admissions made by the patent applicant during prosecution.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.SiOnyx, LLC
· IPR2024-01431
Samsung has filed an IPR petition challenging 54 claims of SiOnyx’s ’737 image‑sensor patent, asserting anticipation or obviousness over multiple prior‑art references and urging the Board not to deny institution.
patent
Apple Inc. v.NL Giken Inc.
· IPR2024-01277
Apple Inc. has filed an IPR challenging NL Giken's content streaming patent, asserting that core bookmarking and next-content navigation features are obvious over prior art references Cordray and Wiser.
patent
3Shape A/S et al. v.Medit Corporation et al.
· IPR2024-01276
Petitioners challenge U.S. Patent No. 9,245,374 regarding 3D voxel data processing used in medical imaging, asserting anticipation and obviousness over prior art references like Sekiguchi and Partain. The claims are broadly challenged across multiple statutory grounds (102 and 103) by 3Shape A/S et al., citing related district court litigation.
patent null
Liberty Energy, Inc. et al. v.U.S. Well Services, LLC
· IPR2024-01274
Liberty Energy filed an opening Petition to challenge U.S. Patent No. 11,091,992, asserting that its claims are obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The petitioner relies on multiple combinations of prior art references within the hydraulic fracturing and well control systems field.
patent null
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al. v.ASUS Technology Licensing Inc.
· IPR2024-01273
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. has filed an IPR petition challenging U.S. Patent No. 10,785,759 owned by ASUS Technology Licensing Inc. The challenge asserts that the claims related to numerology bandwidth determination in wireless systems are obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
This initial filing details multiple grounds of obviousness, combining various prior art references including Noh, Tooher, Islam, Jiang, and Miao.
patent instituted
Google LLC v.Metarail, Inc.
· IPR2024-01272
Google LLC petitioned the PTAB challenging Metarail's patent covering automated deep-link creation based on obviousness (103). The Board found that the petition showed a strong basis on the merits and decided to institute review of all 20 claims. This decision moves the dispute into the substantive examination phase at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
patent null
Google LLC v.Metarail, Inc.
· IPR2024-01271
Google LLC has challenged Metarail's deep-linking patent (10262342) at the PTAB, asserting that the claims are obvious.
patent instituted
Google LLC v.Metarail, Inc.
· IPR2024-01270
Google LLC has challenged Metarail's deep-linking patents in a PTAB petition, arguing that the claimed invention—a universal variable map for generating deep-linked ads—is obvious. The petitioner asserts that combining prior art references like Belanger and Halevy would have made the automation of mapping fields predictable to a Person Having Ordinary Skill in the Art.
patent
Google LLC v.Metarail, Inc.
· IPR2024-01269
Google LLC has filed an IPR petition challenging Metarail's '626 patent, arguing that its claims regarding parameter mapping and deep linking automation are obvious. The petitioner relies on combinations of prior art references, including Belanger, Halevy, and Reichardt, to establish obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
patent null
3Shape A/S et al. v.Medit Corporation et al.
· IPR2024-01268
Petitioners, including 3Shape A/S, have filed an IPR challenging the validity of Medit Corporation's patent claims related to 3D scanning and stitching technology. The central argument asserts that the claimed invention is obvious over prior art references Kriveshko and Zhang when combining global motion optimization techniques. This challenges the scope of a major patent in the computer vision market.
patent
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Cerence Operating Company et al.
· IPR2024-01267
Samsung Electronics filed an Inter Partes Review petition challenging Cerence Operating Company’s handwriting recognition patents based on obviousness. The petitioners argue that combining prior art references Arai and Fenwick renders the claimed input methods obvious to a Person Having Ordinary Skill in the Art.
patent
3Shape A/S et al. v.Medit Corporation et al.
· IPR2024-01266
3Shape A/S filed an IPR petition challenging Medit Corporation’s patent on digital dentistry technology. The petitioner argues that the claimed 3D scanning methods are obvious under 35 U.S.C. §103, based on combining prior art systems.
patent null
3Shape A/S et al. v.Medit Corporation et al.
· IPR2024-01265
3Shape A/S filed an Initial Petition challenging the validity of Medit Corporation's patent, asserting that the claims are obvious over combinations of prior art references. The petitioner targets multiple claim subsets using Trousset, Durbin, and Kariathungal as evidence of obviousness.
patent
2985 LLC d/b/a Mountain Voyage Company, LLC v.The Ridge Wallet LLC
· IPR2024-01264
A challenger has filed an Inter Partes Review petition against U.S. Patent No. 10,791,808, owned by The Ridge Wallet LLC. The petitioner asserts that the patent's compact wallet structure and auxiliary clip mechanism are obvious combinations of existing prior art references. This challenge targets all 24 claims based on Section 103 (obviousness).
