US PTAB IP Litigation

patent denied · Oct 20, 2025

Foleon seeks a Director review to compel entry of adverse judgment after Turtl Surf disclaimed all challenged claims of its interactive‑document patent. The petitioner argues the Board erred in denying a motion for adverse judgment, citing precedent where such judgments were entered pre‑institution.

Foleon Inc. et al. v.TURTL SURF & IMMERSE LIMITED

patent denied · Oct 20, 2025

Foleon’s request for Director review to impose an adverse judgment on Turtl Surf & Immerse was denied. The Patent Owner argued procedural impropriety and reliance on established PTAB precedent rejecting adverse judgments after a disclaimer.

Foleon Inc. et al. v.TURTL SURF & IMMERSE LIMITED

The USPTO Director denied Foleon Inc.’s request for review of the decision to deny institution of an IPR against Turtl Surf & Immerse Limited’s patent 12,118,290. The denial leaves the institution decision unchanged.

patent · Oct 20, 2025

Foleon Inc. et al. v.TURTL SURF & IMMERSE LIMITED

patent instituted · Oct 20, 2025

Foleon has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of 18 claims of Turtl’s ’290 patent covering modular document generation, arguing the claims are obvious over multiple prior‑art references and that discretionary denial is unwarranted.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Kannuu Pty. Ltd.

· IPR2026-00071

The PTAB granted institution for IPR2026-00071, allowing Samsung Electronics to challenge Kannuu's patent 11573939.

patent · Oct 17, 2025

Terumo BCT, Inc. v.Haemonetics Corporation

· IPR2026-00046

Terumo BCT has filed an IPR petition challenging all 30 claims of Haemonetics’ plasma‑collection patent, arguing they are obvious over the Lavender and Fletcher‑Haynes systems (and Min for a subset). The petition relies on detailed algorithmic comparisons and cites §103 unpatentability.

patent · Oct 17, 2025

Samsara, Inc. v.Motive Technologies, Inc.

· IPR2026-00034

Samsara has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate Motive's camera‑calibration patent (US 12,136,276). The petition alleges obviousness over multiple prior‑art references covering similar autonomous‑vehicle imaging and calibration techniques. It requests the Board to institute the review and cancel the claims.

patent denied · Oct 17, 2025

Samsara, Inc. v.Motive Technologies, Inc.

· IPR2026-00034

The PTAB denied institution of an IPR proceeding (IPR2026-00034) involving Samsara, Inc. and Motive Technologies, Inc., finding the petitioner failed to meet the standard for likelihood of prevailing.

Micron Technology, Inc. et al. v.Palisade Technologies, LLP

· IPR2025-01561

Micron filed an unopposed motion to dismiss its inter partes review of Palisade’s U.S. Patent No. 8,148,962 before the Board had decided whether to institute the case. The motion relies on the Board’s discretion to terminate early‑stage proceedings and cites prior PTAB decisions granting similar dismissals.

Voltage, LLC et al. v.Shoals Technologies Group, LLC et al.

· IPR2026-00068

Voltage, LLC has filed an IPR petition challenging 11 claims of Shoals Technologies' solar connector patent, asserting obviousness over Machida combined with Solon or Kim and Sakatani. The petition adopts claim constructions from a related ITC case and seeks institution of the review.

Ontel Products Corporation et al. v.Happy Products, Inc.

· IPR2025-01536

Ontel Products has petitioned the PTAB to invalidate Happy Products' RE’479 tablet‑pillow patent, asserting obviousness over six prior‑art references covering similar multi‑angle media supports.

Micron Technology, Inc. et al. v.Palisade Technologies, LLP

· IPR2025-01561

Micron has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of 12 claims of Palisade’s ’962 voltage‑regulator patent, asserting obviousness over the Scott patent and over Scott combined with Gradinariu. The petition details extensive claim‑by‑claim comparisons to the prior art.

NVIDIA Corporation v.Onesta IP, LLC

· IPR2026-00011

NVIDIA has filed an IPR petition challenging the validity of Onesta IP's U.S. Patent 11,841,803.

Micron Technology, Inc. et al. v.Palisade Technologies, LLP

· IPR2025-01559

Micron filed an unopposed motion to dismiss its IPR before the Board institutes trial, arguing the proceeding is at an early stage and resources are minimal. The Board has historically granted such pre‑institution dismissals.

Google LLC v.Sonos, Inc.

· IPR2026-00021

Google has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of nine Sonos claims covering multi‑zone audio control, arguing they are obvious over prior‑art references such as Geiwitz, Van Hulle, Aiso, and Allen.