US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 23 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent · Oct 31, 2025
Meta Platforms, LLC v.Weple IP Holdings LLC et al.
· IPR2026-00081
Meta Platforms has filed an IPR petition challenging all 26 claims of U.S. Patent 12,131,357, asserting that the claims are obvious over prior‑art web‑media platforms (Fosnacht) combined with native‑app techniques (Kirkpatrick) and advertising methods (Sharma). The petition meets all procedural requirements and seeks institution of the review.
patent · Oct 31, 2025
Meta Platforms, Inc. v.Weple IP Holdings LLC et al.
· IPR2026-00080
Meta Platforms has filed an IPR petition to invalidate Weple IP Holdings' 12‑billion‑dollar streaming‑media patent, asserting that all 30 claims are obvious over earlier web‑video and native‑app patents. The petition outlines three grounds of obviousness and discusses discretionary denial issues.
patent · Oct 31, 2025
Meta Platforms, LLC v.Weple IP Holdings LLC et al.
· IPR2026-00079
Meta Platforms petitions the PTAB to invalidate Weple IP's 12,112,357 patent covering mobile streaming media. The challenger argues the claims are obvious over Fosnacht, Kirkpatrick, and Sharma references and seeks institution of the IPR.
patent · Oct 31, 2025
Disney Entertainment & Sports LLC v.Adeia Guides Inc.
· IPR2026-00056
Disney Entertainment & Sports LLC has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all six claims of Adeia Guides’ U.S. Patent 10,165,324. The petition alleges obviousness over multiple prior‑art combinations and argues that those references were never considered during prosecution.
patent · Oct 31, 2025
Disney Entertainment & Sports LLC v.Adeia Media Holdings Inc.
· IPR2026-00051
Disney has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of claims 1‑13 of Adeia’s U.S. Patent 8,280,987, alleging obviousness over prior‑art CDN patents Dilley, Russell, and Menon. The petition includes detailed claim‑by‑claim mappings and proposed claim constructions.
patent · Oct 31, 2025
Google LLC et al. v.HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC
· IPR2026-00049
Google has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of claim 26 of Headwater Research’s ’359 patent, arguing that the claim is obvious over the Shell, Cole, and Flack references under 35 U.S.C. §103.
patent · Oct 31, 2025
Google LLC et al. v.HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC
· IPR2026-00048
Google has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all ten claims of Headwater Research’s ’757 patent covering wireless offloading and network selection. The petition relies on prior‑art references Wynn, Karaoguz and Deshpande to argue obviousness under 35 U.S.C. §103.
patent · Oct 31, 2025
Disney Entertainment & Sports LLC v.Adeia Guides Inc.
· IPR2026-00055
Disney Entertainment & Sports LLC has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of claims 1‑6 of Adeia Guides’ U.S. Patent 9,860,595, alleging obviousness over several prior‑art references. The petition details four grounds combining Tecot, Lee, Logan, Poslinski, and McElhatten. The case is pending institution.
patent · Oct 31, 2025
Google LLC et al. v.HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC
· IPR2026-00050
Google has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate all 30 claims of Headwater’s 8,631,102 patent covering mobile‑hotspot forwarding services, citing anticipation and obviousness over multiple prior‑art references.
patent denied · Oct 31, 2025
Apple Inc. v.HBCU Messaging US LP
· IPR2026-00107
The PTAB denied institution for IPR2026-00107, finding that Apple Inc. failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on the challenged claims.
patent denied · Oct 31, 2025
Apple Inc. v.HBCU MESSAGING US LP
· IPR2026-00105
The PTAB granted institution for IPR2026-00105 after finding the petitioner had a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one claim, despite reviewing discretionary considerations.
patent denied · Oct 31, 2025
Apple Inc. v.HBCU Messaging US LP
· IPR2026-00104
The PTAB denied the institution of an IPR petition filed by Apple Inc. against HBCU Messaging US LP, finding that Apple failed to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on the challenged claims.
patent instituted · Oct 31, 2025
Google LLC et al. v.HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC
· IPR2026-00049
The PTAB granted institution for IPR2026-00049, allowing Google LLC et al. to challenge HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC's patent 9179359 after finding a reasonable likelihood of prevailing.
patent instituted · Oct 31, 2025
Google LLC et al. v.HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC
· IPR2026-00050
The PTAB granted institution for IPR2026-00050, allowing the challenger to proceed to merits review based on a reasonable likelihood of prevailing.
patent · Oct 30, 2025
Avidbots Corporation et al. v.Brain Corporation
· IPR2025-01600
Avidbots has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate Brain Corporation’s U.S. Patent 10,001,780 covering autonomous robot navigation. The petition relies on four obviousness grounds combining Beardsley, Castellanos, Khatib, and Yamamoto references. The Board has yet to decide whether to institute the review.
patent · Oct 28, 2025
Intelligent Protection Management Corp. v.Cisco Technology, Inc., et al.
· IPR2025-01589
IPM petitions the PTAB to institute an IPR against Cisco’s ’708 video‑conferencing patent, arguing all 19 claims are obvious over prior‑art sliders and layout controls.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Oct 27, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Netlist, Inc.
· IPR2026-00017
The PTAB held that Samsung and its co‑petitioners proved all 30 claims of Netlist’s ’918 hybrid memory patent obvious over Harris, JEDEC FBDIMM standards, Amidi and Hajeck, resulting in a complete invalidation.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Oct 27, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Netlist, Inc.
· IPR2026-00017
Samsung and its affiliates successfully challenged all twenty claims of Netlist’s ’160 memory‑package patent. The PTAB held the claims obvious over the Kim, Rajan, and Wyman references and declared them unpatentable.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Oct 27, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Netlist, Inc.
· IPR2026-00017
The PTAB held that Samsung and its co‑petitioners proved all 34 claims of Netlist’s ’060 patent obvious over prior art. The Board adopted key claim constructions and invalidated the entire patent.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Oct 27, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Netlist, Inc.
· IPR2026-00017
The PTAB issued a Final Written Decision invalidating all 30 claims of Netlist’s ’054 flash‑DRAM hybrid memory patent. Samsung successfully showed the claims were obvious over Harris, JEDEC FBDIMM standards, Amidi’s battery‑backup design, and Hajeck’s power‑anomaly protection.
patent mixed - some claims cancelled, some upheld · Oct 27, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Netlist, Inc.
· IPR2026-00017
The PTAB held that claims 1,10‑13, and 21 of Netlist’s 9,824,035 patent are obvious over prior art, rendering them unpatentable, while claims 2,6, and 22 remain valid.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Oct 27, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Netlist, Inc.
· IPR2026-00017
The PTAB held that all 35 claims of Netlist’s ’339 memory‑module patent are obvious over the Ellsberry and Halbert references, rendering the claims unpatentable.
patent denied · Oct 27, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Netlist, Inc.
· IPR2026-00017
The USPTO denied Samsung's request for Director Review of two Netlist IPRs, leaving the PTAB's decisions final.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Oct 27, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Netlist, Inc.
· IPR2026-00017
The PTAB held that claims 1‑15 of Netlist’s U.S. Patent 9,824,035 are unpatentable. Samsung and Micron successfully argued that the claims are obvious over the Perego memory‑module disclosure combined with the JEDEC DDR2 standard.
