US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 224 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent Final Written Decision · Sep 13, 2024
Apple Inc. v.Proxense, LLC
· IPR2024-01398
The PTAB found all nine challenged claims unpatentable over the combination of prior art references Giobbi '157, Giobbi '139, and Dua. The Board specifically rejected arguments regarding § 112(f) limitations, confirming that key terms like 'PDK' and 'RDC' convey definite structure to a POSITA.
patent · Sep 12, 2024
Shenzhen Tuozhu Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v.Stratasys, Inc. et al.
· IPR2025-00257
Petitioner seeks to sustain PTAB institution of an IPR over Stratasys’s 3D‑printer patent, arguing the Board correctly applied Fintiv factors and its broad stipulation blocks discretionary denial.
patent denied · Sep 12, 2024
SAVANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC d/b/a GE LIGHTING et al. v.Feit Electric Company, Inc.
· IPR2025-00260
The USPTO Director denied Feit Electric’s request for review of the Board’s order to deny its motion to terminate IPR2025-00260, finding the request improper under the regulations.
patent · Sep 12, 2024
Shenzhen Tuozhu Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v.Stratasys, Inc. et al.
· IPR2025-00257
Stratasys seeks Director review to overturn the PTAB’s institution of an IPR against its 3D‑printing patent, arguing the panel misapplied the Fintiv factors and over‑relied on a stipulation. The petition highlights the actual trial date, discovery investment, and identical parties as reasons for discretionary denial.
patent instituted · Sep 12, 2024
SAVANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC d/b/a GE LIGHTING et al. v.Feit Electric Company, Inc.
· IPR2025-00260
The PTAB granted institution of an IPR against Feit Electric’s 8604678 LED patent, covering claims 1 and 11‑14, and ordered consolidation with a related IPR. Petitioner demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on obviousness grounds.
patent · Sep 12, 2024
SAVANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC d/b/a GE LIGHTING et al. v.Feit Electric Company, Inc.
· IPR2025-00260
Court decision.
patent · Sep 12, 2024
Shenzhen Tuozhu Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v.Stratasys, Inc. et al.
· IPR2025-00257
Court decision.
patent · Sep 12, 2024
Shenzhen Tuozhu Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v.Stratasys, Inc. et al.
· IPR2025-00257
Shenzhen Tuozhu Technology petitions to invalidate Stratasys' 3D‑printer heated‑bed patent, asserting that all 15 claims are obvious over a combination of existing 3D‑printing references.
patent · Sep 12, 2024
SAVANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC d/b/a GE LIGHTING et al. v.Feit Electric Company, Inc.
· IPR2025-00260
Savant Technologies (GE Lighting) petitions the PTAB to invalidate claims 1 and 11‑14 of Feit Electric’s white‑light LED patent, arguing they are obvious over several LED‑related publications. The petition seeks institution of inter‑partes review.
patent · Sep 12, 2024
ELONG INTERNATIONAL USA INC. et al. v.Feit Electric Company, Inc.
· IPR2025-00258
Elong International and Xiamen Longstar have filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of 16 claims of Feit Electric’s white‑light LED patent, arguing the claims are obvious over several LED‑lighting references. The petition cites Basin‑2007, Krummacher, Hussell and others as prior art.
patent instituted · Sep 12, 2024
Shenzhen Tuozhu Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v.Stratasys, Inc. et al.
· IPR2025-00257
The PTAB institution decision found a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability for claims in the '660 patent, relating to 3D printing. The Board relied heavily on obviousness (103) arguments using combinations of prior art references like Cable/Naware and Comb/Tummala.
patent · Sep 10, 2024
UATP IP, LLC et al. v.Slick Slide LLC
· PGR2024-00054
UATP IP petitions PTAB to invalidate Slick Slide's low‑friction slide patent, asserting obviousness over Phillips, Fallgatter, and a nylon‑mesh product, plus lack of enablement and indefiniteness. The petition seeks institution and a finding that the challenged claims are unpatentable.
patent instituted · Sep 10, 2024
UATP IP, LLC et al. v.Slick Slide LLC
· PGR2024-00054
UATP IP successfully challenged the patentability of claims related to low-friction slide systems and mesh layers. The PTAB granted institution after finding likelihood of unpatentability, moving the case toward trial preparation while providing preliminary claim construction guidance on key terms.
patent · Sep 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01396
Samsung has filed a rehearing request challenging the USPTO’s denial of institution for its IPR on the grounds that the agency’s retroactive policy change violated due process, the APA, and statutory limits. The petition seeks reinstatement of the Board’s original institution decision.
patent · Sep 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01396
Headwater Research seeks Director Review to overturn the Board’s institution of an IPR against Samsung’s network‑stack API patent. The Owner argues the Board misapplied discretionary‑denial factors and erred on claim construction. A termination would end the proceeding.
patent · Sep 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01396
Headwater Research files a response to Samsung’s request for rehearing, defending the PTAB’s denial of institution and the recission of the Vidal Memo. The brief argues that discretionary denial is statutory and that Samsung should have foreseen the rescission.
patent · Sep 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01396
Court decision.
patent · Sep 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01396
Court decision.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Sep 9, 2024
Deltran USA LLC et al. v.The Noco Company
· IPR2024-01219
The PTAB held that all seven claims of The Noco Company's portable jump‑starter patent are unpatentable, finding them obvious over prior‑art jump‑starter and USB‑charging references. The decision follows a petition by Deltran USA LLC asserting obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · Sep 9, 2024
Deltran USA LLC et al. v.The Noco Company
· IPR2024-01219
The PTAB held that all eight challenged claims of the Noco Company’s jump‑starter patent are obvious over a combination of prior‑art references, rendering them unpatentable.
patent instituted · Sep 9, 2024
Deltran USA LLC et al. v.The Noco Company
· IPR2024-01219
The PTAB granted institution of an IPR against The Noco Company's 11,584,243 B2 jump‑starter patent. The petitioner, Deltran USA LLC, persuaded the Board that at least one claim is likely unpatentable based on obviousness over combinations such as Richardson + Zhao. All eight challenged claims are now subject to trial.
patent mixed - some claims cancelled, some upheld · Sep 9, 2024
Deltran USA LLC et al. v.The Noco Company
· IPR2024-01219
The PTAB found 22 of the 23 claims of The Noco Company's jump‑starter patent unpatentable in an IPR filed by Deltran USA LLC, leaving only claim 11 intact.
patent instituted · Sep 9, 2024
Deltran USA LLC et al. v.The Noco Company
· IPR2024-01219
The PTAB granted ADC Solutions Auto LLC’s petition to institute an inter partes review of The Noco Company’s portable jump‑starter patent, finding a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability on at least one claim.
patent · Sep 9, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Headwater Research LLC
· IPR2024-01397
Samsung has filed an IPR petition challenging all 19 claims of Headwater’s ’918 patent, arguing they are obvious over existing wireless‑device technologies. The petition also contends that PTAB discretion should not block institution, referencing Advanced Bionics and Fintiv factors.
