US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 193 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent denied · Nov 15, 2024
ResMed Corp. v.Cleveland Medical Devices, Inc.
· IPR2025-00157
The PTAB denied ResMed’s request to waive the deadline for a Director Review in IPR2025-00157, finding the request untimely under the regulations.
patent · Nov 15, 2024
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.WSOU Investments LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development
· IPR2025-00188
Court decision.
patent · Nov 15, 2024
MediaTek Inc. v.DAEDALUS PRIME LLC
· IPR2025-00100
MediaTek and Daedalus Prime have settled their IPR dispute and jointly request that the settlement be kept confidential under statutory provisions. The Board is asked to treat the agreement as business confidential information and keep it separate from the patent file.
patent terminated or settled · Nov 15, 2024
MediaTek Inc. v.DAEDALUS PRIME LLC
· IPR2025-00100
MediaTek and Daedalus Prime reached a settlement that resolves all disputes, prompting a joint motion to terminate the IPR on patent 9,887,838. The Board has not yet decided the merits, and the parties seek termination.
patent · Nov 15, 2024
ResMed Corp. v.Cleveland Medical Devices, Inc.
· IPR2025-00157
ResMed filed a request to waive the 30‑day deadline for a Director Review in its IPR against Cleveland Medical Devices. The Board has set a five‑day window for the patent owner to respond, limiting the reply to five pages and prohibiting new evidence.
patent · Nov 15, 2024
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC
· IPR2025-00084
Ericsson and other U.S. carriers have filed a Director Review request after the PTAB denied institution of an IPR covering a 5G patent owned by Korea’s KT Corp. They argue the Board misapplied Fintiv factors, ignored a Sotera stipulation, and acted retroactively, violating due‑process. The request seeks reversal of the denial.
patent terminated or settled · Nov 15, 2024
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC
· IPR2025-00083
Ericsson, KT and Pegasus entered a settlement that led the PTAB to terminate the inter partes review as to Ericsson. The Board treated the settlement as confidential and left the proceeding open for the remaining petitioners.
patent · Nov 15, 2024
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC
· IPR2025-00083
Nokia, KT, and Pegasus have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 10,638,463 and filed a joint motion to terminate the IPR as to Nokia. The Board is asked to dismiss the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a).
patent denied · Nov 15, 2024
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC
· IPR2025-00083
The PTAB denied a Director Review request by Ericsson and other petitioners, leaving the institution of Pegasus Wireless Innovation's patent 10,638,463 intact.
patent · Nov 15, 2024
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC
· IPR2025-00083
Pegasus Wireless Innovation seeks Director review to overturn the Board’s decision to institute an IPR on its ’463 patent, arguing the patent has been dropped from related district‑court litigation and should not consume Board resources.
patent · Nov 15, 2024
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC
· IPR2025-00084
The PTAB denied institution of an IPR covering Pegasus’s 5G‑related patent. Petitioners sought Director Review, but the patent owner’s authorized response argues the denial was a proper exercise of §314(a) discretion and that the petitioners introduced new, unsupported arguments. The Board’s decision is urged to be upheld.
patent denied · Nov 15, 2024
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC
· IPR2025-00084
The PTAB denied Ericsson and co‑petitioners' request for Director Review of the institution decision in IPR2025-00084, leaving the institution of the challenge to Pegasus Wireless Innovation's patent intact.
patent · Nov 15, 2024
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC
· IPR2025-00083
Court decision.
patent · Nov 15, 2024
American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. et al. v.Neapco Components, LLC
· IPR2025-00091
Court decision.
patent · Nov 15, 2024
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC
· IPR2025-00084
Ericsson has filed a Director Review request in IPR2025‑00084, and the patent owner must respond within five days with a limited brief.
patent · Nov 15, 2024
Google LLC et al. v.Mullen Industries LLC
· IPR2025-00197
Google and Samsung have filed a petition to invalidate all 19 claims of Mullen Industries’ location‑sharing patent, relying on seven new §103 grounds that combine Randall, Wollrab, Obradovich, Sheha, Song, Mura‑Smith and McDonnell references. The petition argues the Board should institute the IPR and cancel the claims, noting no discretionary denial applies.
patent · Nov 15, 2024
Cisco Systems, Inc. v.WSOU Investments LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development
· IPR2025-00188
Cisco has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate claims 1‑10 of WSOU’s ’691 MPLS patent, asserting obviousness over multiple prior‑art references and arguing against discretionary denial.
patent · Nov 15, 2024
Kubota North America Corporation et al. v.Vermeer Manufacturing Company
· IPR2025-00169
Kubota has filed an IPR petition challenging 22 claims of Vermeer’s 9,321,386 patent covering compact tool carriers. The petition relies on foreign patents KR996 and JP705, plus U.S. patents Bares and Beltrami, to argue obviousness. Kubota also argues that discretionary denial is inappropriate.
patent · Nov 15, 2024
Kubota North America Corporation et al. v.Vermeer Manufacturing Company
· IPR2025-00168
Kubota has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate Vermeer’s 9,321,386 patent covering compact tool carriers. The petition relies on Korean KR996, Japanese JP705, and U.S. Bares references to argue obviousness of claims 31‑49, 70‑79, and 86‑87. It also argues that discretionary denial is inappropriate.
patent · Nov 15, 2024
Kubota North America Corporation et al. v.Vermeer Manufacturing Company
· IPR2025-00167
Kubota seeks to invalidate Vermeer’s compact tool carrier patent by arguing obviousness over multiple prior‑art references. The petition requests institution of an IPR covering 31 claims.
patent · Nov 15, 2024
Curio Bioscience, Inc. v.Prognosys Biosciences Inc. et al.
· IPR2025-00193
Curio Bioscience petitions the PTAB to invalidate 12 claims of the ‘030 spatial‑transcriptomics patent, arguing obviousness over Cantor and Armani and anticipation by Frisen, plus lack of written‑description support. The petition also argues that no discretionary denial grounds apply.
patent · Nov 15, 2024
Curio Bioscience, Inc. v.Prognosys Biosciences Inc. et al.
· IPR2025-00192
Curio Bioscience petitions the PTAB to invalidate claims of U.S. Patent 11,549,138 covering spatially encoded biological assays, arguing obviousness over Cantor and Armani and anticipation by Frisen, and asserting lack of written description support.
patent · Nov 15, 2024
Kubota North America Corporation et al. v.Vermeer Manufacturing Company
· IPR2025-00171
Kubota has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate Vermeer’s U.S. Patent 10,202,266 covering compact tool carriers. The challenger relies on Korean patent KR996 and U.S. patents Bares and Beltrami to argue obviousness under §§102/103. The petition also argues that discretionary denial is improper.
patent · Nov 15, 2024
Kubota North America Corporation et al. v.Vermeer Manufacturing Company
· IPR2025-00170
Kubota has filed an IPR petition challenging all 36 claims of Vermeer’s ’750 patent covering compact tool carriers. The challenger relies on Korean patent KR996, and U.S. patents Bares and Beltrami to argue obviousness under §103. The petition also argues that discretionary denial is inappropriate.
