US PTAB IP Litigation
5,620 annotated decisions
Page 186 of 235 · 5,620 total
patent Final Written Decision · May 29, 2024
Google LLC et al. v.EyesMatch Ltd.
· IPR2024-00856
The PTAB issued a Final Written Decision rejecting all claims (1-18) because the Petitioner failed to demonstrate unpatentability by a preponderance of the evidence. The Board adopted a nuanced claim construction from District Court, requiring specific elements like reversed reflection and double distance for 'mirror mimicking.'
patent final · May 29, 2024
Salvacion USA, Inc. et al. v.Trutek Corp.
· IPR2024-00711
The Petitioner successfully demonstrated that the challenged claims (1-3 and 8) were anticipated by multiple prior art references, including Chen. The Board found that the prior art disclosed all claim elements, leading to a final decision of unpatentability.
patent all challenged claims unpatentable · May 24, 2024
WIZ, Inc. v.Orca Security Ltd.
· IPR2024-00864
The PTAB held that all 25 claims of Orca Security’s cloud‑security patent are unpatentable as obvious over prior‑art references Veselov, Hufsmith, and Hutchins. The decision follows a thorough obviousness analysis and affirms the petitioner’s position.
patent · May 24, 2024
WIZ, Inc. v.Orca Security Ltd.
· IPR2024-00865
Orca Security filed a Request for Director Review challenging the PTAB’s Final Written Decision that found all claims of its cloud‑virtualization patent unpatentable. The owner contends the Board improperly introduced new evidence—misinterpreting Veselov’s description of a file system—as teaching the claimed virtual‑disk location, violating procedural rules.
patent · May 24, 2024
WIZ, Inc. v.Orca Security Ltd.
· IPR2024-00865
The PTAB issued an errata to correct a grammatical mistake in the Final Written Decision of IPR2024-00865 concerning patent 11,693,685. The correction clarifies the Board’s language about Hufsmith’s teaching on detecting sensitive data.
patent denied · May 24, 2024
WIZ, Inc. v.Orca Security Ltd.
· IPR2024-00863
The USPTO denied WIZ, Inc.'s request for Director Review of the PTAB's final written decisions in IPR2024-00863 and a related IPR, upholding the decisions against Orca Security's patent.
patent · May 24, 2024
WIZ, Inc. v.Orca Security Ltd.
· IPR2024-00863
Certificate of Service for the Final Written Decision in IPR2024-00863 concerning patent 11,663,031.
patent · May 24, 2024
Askeladden L.L.C. v.--
· IPR2024-00916
Askeladden L.L.C. filed an IPR petition challenging claims of Patent 7480637, arguing they are obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The petitioner contends that combining known SSL/TLS protocols with biometric authentication methods yields predictable results.
The challenge centers on whether the combination of prior art elements—specifically Rescorla and Mathiassen's technologies—is inventive or merely an obvious modification for a Person Having Ordinary Skill In The Art.
patent null · May 24, 2024
Askeladden L.L.C. v.--
· IPR2024-00915
Askeladden L.L.C. filed a Petition challenging Jabaa, L.L.C.'s patent claims related to biometric customer authentication apparatus. The core argument is that the challenged claims are obvious over combinations of prior art references like Mathiassen, Ryan, and Lim. The petitioner seeks to institute proceedings leading to the cancellation of all ten challenged claims.
patent instituted · May 24, 2024
WIZ, Inc. v.Orca Security Ltd.
· IPR2024-00863
WIZ, Inc. has filed an Inter Partes Review (IPR) petition challenging several of Orca Security Ltd.'s patents related to virtual machine and cloud asset protection. The petitioner asserts that the challenged claims are obvious over combinations of existing prior art references, including Veselov, Price, Hufsmith, and Huseinović.
patent instituted · May 24, 2024
Askeladden L.L.C. v.--
· IPR2024-00916
The PTAB granted institution of IPR for Askeladden L.L.C. against Jabaa, L.L.C., challenging claims 7-20 of patent 7480637 related to secure transaction authentication. The Board found a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail based on prior art combinations.
patent instituted · May 24, 2024
WIZ, Inc. v.Orca Security Ltd.
· IPR2024-00865
WIZ, Inc. successfully navigated the institution phase of an IPR against Orca Security Ltd., demonstrating a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on its obviousness claims (35 U.S.C. § 103). The Board preliminarily agreed with Wiz's claim construction arguments regarding snapshot analysis and API usage based on prior art references.
patent · May 22, 2024
Camel Manufacturing Company, LLC, d/b/a Camel Expeditionary v.DLX Enterprises LLC
· PGR2024-00033
Camel Manufacturing and DLX Enterprises filed a joint motion in a PGR to terminate the proceeding and keep their settlement agreement confidential under statutory authority.
patent terminated or settled · May 22, 2024
Camel Manufacturing Company, LLC, d/b/a Camel Expeditionary v.DLX Enterprises LLC
· PGR2024-00033
Camel Manufacturing and DLX Enterprises entered a settlement and jointly moved to terminate their post‑grant review of U.S. Patent No. 11,732,496. The Board is asked to dismiss the proceeding under statutory authority.
patent terminated or settled · May 22, 2024
Camel Manufacturing Company, LLC, d/b/a Camel Expeditionary v.DLX Enterprises LLC
· PGR2024-00033
Camel Manufacturing and DLX Enterprises entered a settlement that resolved all pending PTAB post‑grant review matters for patent 11,732,496. The Board granted the joint motion to terminate and treated the settlement documents as confidential business information.
patent · May 22, 2024
Siemens Mobility, Inc. et al. v.Metrom Rail, LLC
· IPR2024-00947
Siemens Mobility and co‑petitioners seek Director review of a PTAB decision denying institution of an IPR on their UWB train‑control patent. They argue the Board wrongly treated a cited patent number as previously presented art and erred in finding the prior art was substantially the same as that considered during prosecution.
patent null · May 22, 2024
Abbott Laboratories v.Newtonoid Technologies, LLC
· IPR2024-00932
Abbott Laboratories filed a Petition challenging Newtonoid Technologies' patent claims based on obviousness. The petitioner argues that combining known technologies, such as dynamic barcodes and environmental monitoring, renders the claims unpatentable over multiple prior art references. This challenge targets 18 specific claims related to stimuli-responsive labels.
patent denied · May 22, 2024
Siemens Mobility, Inc. et al. v.Metrom Rail, LLC
· IPR2024-00947
Siemens Mobility's IPR challenge against Metrom Rail's rail vehicle control patent was denied by the PTAB. The Board found that the arguments presented were substantially similar to those previously raised during prosecution, leading to a discretionary denial under 35 U.S.C. § 325(d).
patent denied · May 22, 2024
Siemens Mobility, Inc. et al. v.Metrom Rail, LLC
· IPR2024-00947
The PTAB denied a request to reverse the denial of institution for IPR2024-00947, finding that Kane was not 'previously presented art' and that it was substantially similar to Knott.
patent instituted · May 22, 2024
Abbott Laboratories v.Newtonoid Technologies, LLC
· IPR2024-00932
Abbott Laboratories challenged Newtonoid Technologies' '818 patent, asserting obviousness over prior art references like Prusik and Vaillant. The PTAB issued an institution decision finding a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on all 20 challenged claims.
patent terminated or settled · May 21, 2024
Senko Advanced Components, Inc. v.US Conec Ltd.
· PGR2024-00032
Senko Advanced Components and US Conec settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 11,733,466 B2. The parties jointly moved to terminate the PGR, and the Board granted the motion, sealing the settlement agreement.
patent terminated or settled · May 21, 2024
Senko Advanced Components, Inc. v.US Conec Ltd.
· PGR2024-00032
Senko Advanced Components and US Conec Ltd. have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 11,733,466 covering fiber‑optic connectors. They jointly filed a motion to withdraw the PTAB post‑grant review, seeking full termination of the proceeding.
patent terminated or settled · May 21, 2024
Senko Advanced Components, Inc. v.US Conec Ltd.
· PGR2024-00032
Senko Advanced Components and US Conec have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 11,733,466 and jointly filed a motion to keep the settlement confidential and withdraw the PGR petition, effectively ending the proceeding.
patent terminated or settled · May 21, 2024
Dyson Technology Limited et al. v.Omachron Intellectual Property Inc. et al.
· IPR2024-00950
Dyson and Omachron have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 10,080,472, filing a joint motion to terminate the inter partes review. The Board is asked to end the proceeding under 35 U.S.C. §317(a).
