US PTAB IP Litigation
8,722 annotated decisions
Page 17 of 364 · 8,722 total
patent denied · Nov 8, 2025
Cruzr Saddles LLC v.Tethrd LLC
· IPR2025-01407
The PTAB denied the institution of IPR2025-01407, finding that Cruzr Saddles LLC failed to meet the required standard for challenging Tethrd LLC's patent.
patent instituted · Nov 8, 2025
Terumo BCT, Inc. v.Haemonetics Corporation
· IPR2025-01391
The USPTO Office granted institution for IPR2025-01391 after determining the petitioner showed a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on at least one challenged claim.
patent · Nov 7, 2025
Google LLC v.Advanced Coding Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-01278
Google seeks Director Review of the PTAB’s denial to institute an IPR on a video‑encoding patent. The Patent Owner counters that the Director’s discretion is unreviewable and that Google’s statutory arguments are unfounded.
patent · Nov 7, 2025
Google LLC v.Advanced Coding Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-01278
Google seeks Director Review of the USPTO’s denial to institute an IPR against Advanced Coding Technologies’ ’448 patent, alleging statutory and procedural violations. The petition highlights failures to meet hearing requirements, to provide a merits determination, and to follow APA rules.
patent · Nov 7, 2025
Google LLC v.Advanced Coding Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-01277
Google seeks Director Review of the PTAB’s denial to institute an IPR on a media‑server patent. The Patent Owner counters that the Director’s discretion is exclusive and the petition’s statutory arguments are misplaced.
patent · Nov 7, 2025
Google LLC v.Advanced Coding Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-01277
Google has filed a petition for Director Review challenging the USPTO’s denial of institution for patent 8,230,101, asserting statutory and procedural violations. The request seeks reversal of the decision and a compliant institution ruling.
patent terminated or settled · Nov 7, 2025
Generac Power Systems, Inc. et al. v.Champion Power Equipment, Inc.
· IPR2025-01228
Generac, Harbor Freight, and MWE have settled their IPR dispute with Champion Power over a dual‑fuel selector switch. They filed a joint request to keep the settlement agreement confidential and to withdraw from the proceeding.
patent denied · Nov 7, 2025
Google LLC v.Advanced Coding Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-01277
The USPTO denied Google LLC's request for Director Review of the institution denial in three IPRs involving Advanced Coding Technologies' patents. The order confirms the original institution decisions remain in effect.
patent terminated or settled · Nov 7, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Hannibal IP LLC
· IPR2025-01189
Samsung Electronics and Hannibal IP entered a settlement that led to the joint termination of IPR2025-01189 concerning patent 11,368,911. The Board granted the motion and kept the settlement agreement confidential.
patent · Nov 7, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Hannibal IP LLC
· IPR2025-01189
Samsung and Hannibal IP have jointly moved to terminate IPR2025-01189 after reaching a settlement covering multiple patents. The motion cites lack of a final written decision and the benefits of conserving Board resources.
patent terminated or settled · Nov 7, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Hannibal IP LLC
· IPR2025-01188
Samsung Electronics and Hannibal IP entered a settlement that terminated the IPR on patent 11,272,535. The Board granted the joint motion under 35 U.S.C. §317 and kept the settlement confidential.
patent terminated or settled · Nov 7, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Hannibal IP LLC
· IPR2025-01188
Samsung and Hannibal IP have reached a settlement that resolves all disputes over multiple patents, leading them to jointly move to terminate the pending IPR for patent 11,272,535.
patent · Nov 7, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Hannibal IP LLC
· IPR2025-01188
Hannibal IP LLC requests the PTAB Director deny Samsung's IPR on its 5G LBT patent, arguing the challenge is weak, relies on flawed expert testimony, and that the prior art mirrors prosecution disclosures. Samsung’s prior knowledge and the imminent district‑court trial further support denial.
patent · Nov 7, 2025
Generac Power Systems, Inc. et al. v.Champion Power Equipment, Inc.
· IPR2025-01228
Generac and co‑petitioners filed a joint request asking the PTAB to keep their settlement agreement (Exhibit 1300) confidential and separate from the patent file, limiting disclosure under 35 U.S.C. §317(b).
patent denied · Nov 7, 2025
Google LLC v.Advanced Coding Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-01278
The USPTO Director denied Google LLC's request for review of the institution decisions in three IPRs, including the challenge to patent 9,042,448 owned by Advanced Coding Technologies.
patent · Nov 7, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Hannibal IP LLC
· IPR2025-01188
Samsung and Hannibal IP jointly filed a motion to terminate IPR2025-01188, citing their settlement agreement and requesting it be kept confidential under 35 U.S.C. §317(b). The Board is asked to end the proceeding and seal the settlement details.
patent · Nov 7, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Hannibal IP LLC
· IPR2025-01189
Hannibal IP seeks to block Samsung’s IPR over its 5G power‑saving patent, arguing the challenge is weak, relies on expert testimony, and that Samsung had prior notice of the patent. The request cites timing of a parallel trial and unlikely stay to argue for discretionary denial of institution.
patent · Nov 7, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Hannibal IP LLC
· IPR2025-01189
Samsung and Hannibal IP jointly filed a motion to terminate IPR2025-01189, seeking to keep their settlement agreement confidential under statutory authority.
patent · Nov 7, 2025
Google LLC v.Advanced Coding Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-01277
Google has filed an IPR petition challenging all 12 claims of Advanced Coding Technologies’ 2012 media‑server patent, asserting that the claims are obvious over a suite of prior‑art references.
patent · Nov 7, 2025
Generac Power Systems, Inc. et al. v.Champion Power Equipment, Inc.
· IPR2025-01228
Generac Power Systems has filed an IPR petition challenging Champion Power’s U.S. Patent 11,905,896 covering dual‑fuel generator selector switches. The petition asserts that 38 claims are obvious or anticipated over multiple prior‑art references and disputes the patent owner’s claim constructions. Petitioners seek cancellation of all challenged claims.
patent · Nov 7, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Hannibal IP LLC
· IPR2025-01189
Samsung Electronics has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 18 claims of Hannibal IP’s ’911 patent covering PDCCH monitoring and DRX power‑saving techniques. The petition relies on Nimbalker and several 3GPP documents as prior art under §§102 and 103.
patent · Nov 7, 2025
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Hannibal IP LLC
· IPR2025-01188
Samsung Electronics has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all twenty claims of Hannibal IP’s U.S. Patent 11,272,535 covering LBT failure detection in 5G UE. The petition asserts obviousness over multiple pre‑grant publications and 3GPP standards. The Board is asked to institute the review and invalidate the claims.
patent · Nov 7, 2025
Spotify AB et al. v.Tijerino, Manuel
· IPR2025-01280
Spotify has filed an IPR petition challenging all 17 claims of U.S. Patent 9,146,925, asserting that the claims are obvious over prior‑art jukebox systems and audio‑processing patents. The petition also argues against a § 314(a) or § 325(d) denial, citing favorable Fintiv factors.
patent · Nov 7, 2025
Google LLC v.Advanced Coding Technologies LLC
· IPR2025-01278
Google has filed an IPR petition challenging three claims of Advanced Coding Technologies' 2015 video‑compression patent, asserting obviousness over prior‑art combinations involving Phek, Martins, He, and Sakazume. The petition argues the examiner never considered these combinations, seeking institution of the review.
