US PTAB IP Litigation
8,574 annotated decisions
Page 167 of 358 · 8,574 total
patent
Catalyst OrthoScience Inc. v.Shoulder Innovations, Inc.
· PGR2024-00042
Catalyst OrthoScience seeks a PTAB post‑grant review of Shoulder Innovations' reverse shoulder implant patent, arguing obviousness over multiple prior‑art references and indefiniteness of the term “central channel.” The petition also asserts that discretionary denial is unwarranted.
patent terminated or settled
SHENZHEN PINCAN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD v.The Ridge Wallet LLC
· IPR2024-00340
The IPR concerning Ridge Wallet's patent 10,791,808 was terminated after the parties reached a confidential settlement. The Board granted the joint motion to terminate and ordered the settlement kept separate from the patent file.
patent
3D Diagnostix, Inc. v.Watson Guide IP, LLC
· PGR2024-00040
3D Diagnostix petitions the PTAB to invalidate 13 claims of Watson Guide IP’s dental guide patent, alleging lack of written description, indefiniteness, and obviousness over multiple prior‑art references.
patent terminated or settled
VIVITRO LABS INC. v.BIOMEDICAL DEVICE CONSULTANTS & LABORATORIES OF COLORADO, LLC
· IPR2024-00320
Vivitro Labs and the patent owner settled their IPR dispute over a biomedical device patent, leading the Board to terminate the proceeding and keep the settlement confidential.
patent denied
Microchip Technology, Inc. v.Aptiv Technologies AG et al.
· IPR2024-00494
The Director denied Microchip Technology's request for review of the institution decisions that had denied institution of its IPRs against Aptiv's vehicle communication patent. The denial leaves the institution denials intact.
patent
Microchip Technology, Inc. v.Aptiv Technologies AG et al.
· IPR2024-00494
Microchip Technology has filed a Director Review request to overturn PTAB’s denial of institution in two IPRs covering its USB‑hub patent. The petitioner alleges the Board failed to apply an agreed claim construction and ignored prior‑art analysis. The request is pending review by the Director.
patent
Phison Electronics Corporation v.Vervain, LLC.
· PGR2024-00047
Phison Electronics Corp. has filed a post‑grant review petition seeking cancellation of Vervain’s ‘546 NAND flash memory patent. The petition alleges lack of patent‑eligible subject matter, insufficient written description, indefiniteness, and obviousness over extensive prior art.
patent
Visa, Inc. v.Cortex MCP, Inc.
· IPR2024-00490
Visa filed an authorized response opposing Cortex MCP’s Director Review request, asserting that the request raises a new, forfeited argument about the timing of verification in the Oborne prior art. Visa maintains the Board’s obviousness finding is well‑supported.
patent
PHISON ELECTRONICS CORPORATION v.Vervain, LLC
· PGR2024-00048
Phison Electronics has filed a post‑grant review petition seeking cancellation of all seven claims of Vervain’s ‘612 NAND flash memory patent, alleging lack of written description, indefiniteness, and obviousness. The petition relies on extensive prior‑art patents and technical literature covering hybrid SLC‑MLC flash systems.
patent terminated or settled
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.Advanced Coding Technologies, LLC
· IPR2024-00327
Samsung and Advanced Coding Technologies have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 9,986,303 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review, invoking 35 U.S.C. §317.
patent
LCY Biotechnology Holding, Inc. v.Radici Chimica, S.p.A.
· PGR2024-00044
LCY Biotechnology has filed a PGR petition challenging Radici Chimica’s 2023 patent on engineered yeast for terpene production, arguing obviousness over Bailey and Zhang and lack of enablement due to the claim breadth.
patent denied
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.XR COMMUNICATIONS LLC
· IPR2024-00314
Ericsson filed a Director Review request after the PTAB denied instituting its IPR against XR Communications’ wireless patent. The petition argues the Board erred on claim construction and denied a hearing on a sua sponte construction, violating precedent.
patent
Ericsson Inc. et al. v.XR COMMUNICATIONS LLC
· IPR2024-00314
Ericsson and Nokia request Director review of a PTAB decision that denied institution of an IPR on their 5G‑related patent, arguing the Board added an unsupported ‘pre‑equalization’ step in claim construction. They seek vacatur of the denial and to proceed with the review.
patent
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. v.UMBRA TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
· IPR2024-00270
Umbra Technologies has filed a Director Review request challenging the USPTO's decision to institute an IPR against its server‑discovery patent, arguing the Board misread claim language and that the prior art does not teach a list of servers.
patent terminated or settled
VIVITRO LABS INC. v.BIOMEDICAL DEVICE CONSULTANTS & LABORATORIES OF COLORADO, LLC
· IPR2024-00320
VIVITRO Labs and Biomedical Device Consultants & Laboratories of Colorado have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 9,237,935, filing a joint motion to terminate the ongoing IPR and keep settlement documents confidential.
patent terminated or settled
Motorola Solutions, Inc. v.STA Group, LLC
· IPR2024-00207
Motorola Solutions and STA Group settled their dispute over Patent 8,145,249, filing a joint motion that led the PTAB to terminate the inter partes review.
patent
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. v.UMBRA TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
· IPR2024-00270
Umbra Technologies has filed a Request for Director Review seeking to overturn the PTAB’s decision to institute an IPR against its ’595 patent. The petition argues the panel erred by equating the patent’s specific “list of available servers” request with a generic “services” request in the Hankins prior art, and by using the patent itself as a roadmap. It asks the Director to vacate the institution and terminate the proceeding.
patent
Visa, Inc. v.Cortex MCP, Inc.
· IPR2024-00490
Cortex MCP seeks Director Review of the PTAB’s final written decision that cancelled 14 claims of its payment‑tokenization patent. The owner contends the Board introduced an unraised obviousness theory, violating procedural rules and the APA. The request asks the Director to reverse the cancellations and confirm the claims.
patent
Motorola Solutions, Inc. v.STA Group, LLC
· IPR2024-00207
Motorola Solutions and STA Group filed a joint motion asking the PTAB to keep their settlement agreement confidential under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b). They contend the agreement contains highly sensitive business information that could be harmed if disclosed.
patent
US Conec Ltd. v.Senko Advanced Components, Inc.
· IPR2024-00119
US Conec Ltd. and Senko Advanced Components have settled their IPR over U.S. Patent 11,415,760 and jointly request that the settlement be kept confidential while moving to terminate the proceeding.
patent
National Beef Packing Company, LLC v.Institute for Environmental Health, Inc.
· IPR2024-00183
National Beef Packing Company and Institute for Environmental Health have settled their disputes over four patents and jointly moved to terminate the related inter partes reviews, invoking 35 U.S.C. § 317.
patent terminated or settled
National Beef Packing Company, LLC v.Institute for Environmental Health, Inc.
· IPR2024-00186
National Beef Packing Company and Institute for Environmental Health settled their inter partes review, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding and dismiss the petition.
patent terminated or settled
Motorola Solutions, Inc. v.STA Group, LLC
· IPR2024-00207
Motorola Solutions and STA Group have settled their dispute over a VoIP audio‑mixing patent and jointly moved to terminate the pending inter partes review.
patent terminated or settled
National Beef Packing Company, LLC v.Institute for Environmental Health, Inc.
· IPR2024-00185
National Beef and Institute for Environmental Health settled four inter partes review proceedings, resulting in the termination of all petitions without a merits decision. The Board granted the joint motion to terminate and kept the settlement agreement confidential.
