US PTAB IP Litigation
5,620 annotated decisions
Page 167 of 235 · 5,620 total
patent instituted · Jul 17, 2024
Nike, Inc. v.SherryWear, LLC
· IPR2024-01122
Nike challenged SherryWear's claims regarding bra design and intimate apparel based on obviousness over prior art references like Vidal and Pintor. The PTAB institution decision found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing for Nike, specifically regarding independent claim 1 over the combination of Vidal/Pintor, leading to the case being instituted.
patent denied · Jul 17, 2024
Roku, Inc. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01055
Roku, Inc.'s IPR challenging Anonymous Media Research Holdings' content identification patent was denied by the PTAB. The Board found that Petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on its obviousness assertions against multiple prior art references.
patent final · Jul 17, 2024
Dr. Squatch, LLC v.The Procter & Gamble Company
· IPR2024-01174
The PTAB issued a final written decision finding all 23 challenged claims of U.S. Patent No. 11,497,706 unpatentable. The petitioner successfully demonstrated that the claimed aluminum-free deodorant compositions were anticipated or rendered obvious by various combinations of prior art references.
patent final · Jul 17, 2024
MPL Brands NV, Inc. v.BuzzBallz, LLC
· IPR2024-01098
The PTAB issued a final written decision finding all six claims of the '904 patent unpatentable. The Board determined that the claimed features were anticipated or obvious over prior art references (Kick, Ackermann, Kaminski, Hutchinson).
patent terminated or settled · Jul 16, 2024
National Beef Packing Company, LLC v.Institute for Environmental Health, Inc.
· IPR2024-00185
National Beef and Institute for Environmental Health settled four inter partes review proceedings, resulting in the termination of all petitions without a merits decision. The Board granted the joint motion to terminate and kept the settlement agreement confidential.
patent · Jul 16, 2024
National Beef Packing Company, LLC v.Institute for Environmental Health, Inc.
· IPR2024-00185
National Beef and Institute for Environmental Health have settled their disputes and jointly moved to terminate four pending IPRs, invoking 35 U.S.C. § 317(a). The Board is asked to grant termination before any final written decisions are issued.
patent instituted · Jul 16, 2024
National Beef Packing Company, LLC v.Institute for Environmental Health, Inc.
· IPR2024-00186
National Beef Packing Company challenged the '771 patent on obviousness grounds related to modular compositing and microbial testing protocols. The PTAB institution decision was driven by parallel district court litigation and a compelling merits case presented by the petitioner. This sets up significant future challenges in both administrative and judicial forums.
patent instituted · Jul 16, 2024
National Beef Packing Company, LLC v.Institute for Environmental Health, Inc.
· IPR2024-00186
National Beef Packing Company successfully petitioned to institute IPR against the '771 patent, establishing a reasonable likelihood of success over at least one claim. The Board adopted Petitioner's definition for 'validation,' clarifying that it merely requires a sample test negative, rejecting the Patent Owner's broader interpretation regarding commercial release.
patent null · Jul 15, 2024
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v.California Institute of Technology et al.
· IPR2024-01178
Bio-Rad Laboratories has filed an IPR challenging the validity of a patent covering multiplex digital PCR assays owned by California Institute of Technology et al. The petitioner argues that the claimed methods are unpatentably obvious, representing only a straightforward extension of existing nucleic acid analysis concepts.
patent null · Jul 15, 2024
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v.California Institute of Technology et al.
· IPR2024-01177
Bio-Rad Laboratories filed a Petition challenging the obviousness of nine claims in patent 10068051, which relates to molecular diagnostics/PCR methods. The petitioner argues that the claimed multiplexed detection techniques are straightforward extensions of existing prior art concepts found in references like Saxonov and Silverbrook.
patent · Jul 15, 2024
Kia Corporation et al. v.Emerging Automotive LLC
· IPR2024-01167
Petitioners Kia and Toyota filed a petition challenging Emerging Automotive LLC's patent on vehicle access control systems using electronic keys. The challenge centers on multiple grounds of obviousness and anticipation, citing prior art from Kleve, Hatton, Mikan, Xiao, and Sekiyama.
patent · Jul 15, 2024
Roku, Inc. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01053
Roku challenges a patent held by Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC in an IPR proceeding, asserting that the challenged claims related to audience measurement are obvious over prior art.
Petitioner Roku relies on combinations of references like Feininger and Ramaswamy/Conklin to demonstrate predictable results in media playback analysis.
patent denied · Jul 15, 2024
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v.California Institute of Technology et al.
· IPR2024-01178
The PTAB denied Bio-Rad Laboratories' request for rehearing regarding the denial of institution in IPR2024-01178, upholding its finding that the petitioner failed to meet the burden of proving unpatentability.
patent instituted · Jul 15, 2024
Kia Corporation et al. v.Emerging Automotive LLC
· IPR2024-01167
The PTAB institution decision granted IPR on claims 1-21, allowing Kia and Toyota to challenge Emerging Automotive's patent. The Board found that the combination of prior art references (Kleve/Hatton) supported the challenged limitations regarding encrypted data and privilege settings in vehicle access systems.
patent denied · Jul 15, 2024
Roku, Inc. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01057
The PTAB denied Roku's request to institute IPR against the '848 patent, finding that Petitioner failed to establish a reasonable likelihood of prevailing. The denial hinged on the failure of the Petitioner to prove that key prior art (Seet) was entitled to its provisional filing date due to lack of written description support for non-audio media.
patent denied · Jul 15, 2024
Roku, Inc. v.Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
· IPR2024-01054
Roku's IPR against Anonymous Media Research Holdings was denied because the key prior art reference (Seet) lacked written description support for non-audio media, preventing it from qualifying as prior art to the challenged patent.
patent Final Written Decision · Jul 15, 2024
Kia Corporation et al. v.Emerging Automotive LLC
· IPR2024-01167
The PTAB found that the majority of claims (1-5 and 7-21) in the '659 patent were unpatentable based on combinations of prior art references. The Board specifically agreed with Petitioner's argument that Kleve combined with Hatton rendered independent claim 1 obvious, finding a reasonable expectation of success for POSITA.
patent · Jul 11, 2024
Jumio Corporation v.FaceTec, Inc.
· IPR2025-00109
Jumio challenges the PTAB’s decision to institute an IPR against FaceTec’s biometric authentication patent. FaceTec’s counsel argues the Board correctly applied the Fintiv factors and that parallel litigation does not warrant reversal. The response seeks denial of the petition for review.
patent denied · Jul 11, 2024
Jumio Corporation v.FaceTec, Inc.
· IPR2025-00108
The PTAB denied Jumio Corp.’s request for Director Review of the institution decisions in four IPRs, including the case involving FaceTec’s patent 11,693,938. The denial leaves the institution decisions unchanged.
patent · Jul 11, 2024
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v.KP INNOVATIONS 2, LLC
· IPR2025-00101
Samsung Electronics seeks Director Review of the PTAB’s denial to institute inter partes review of claims 18‑21 of its communication‑service device patent. The petitioner argues the Board erred in claim construction and denied due‑process rights by refusing a preliminary reply.
patent · Jul 11, 2024
Jumio Corporation v.FaceTec, Inc.
· IPR2025-00106
FaceTec requests the PTAB Director to deny institution of Jumio’s IPR, arguing that the Board misapplied Fintiv factors and that the case duplicates ongoing litigation. The petition highlights ethical violations, overlapping issues, and time‑bar concerns.
patent · Jul 11, 2024
Trove Brands, LLC v.CamelBak Products, LLC
· IPR2025-00155
Trove Brands has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of 16 claims of CamelBak’s 11,684,187 patent covering drink containers with removable caps. The petition relies on prior art from Kiyota, Choi, Park, and Ribarits to argue obviousness and asserts a means‑plus‑function construction for the “user release mechanism.”
patent denied · Jul 11, 2024
Micron Technology, Inc. et al. v.Yangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd.
· IPR2025-00119
The PTAB denied Micron's second IPR petition against Yangtze Memory's 3D memory patent (10,879,254), citing the overlap of asserted prior art knowledge with a previously instituted review.
patent instituted · Jul 11, 2024
Jumio Corporation v.FaceTec, Inc.
· IPR2025-00109
Jumio Corporation successfully petitioned to institute IPR against FaceTec, Inc.'s facial recognition patent (11874910), establishing a reasonable likelihood of obviousness. The Board found that prior art combinations, particularly Derakhshani and Tanii, teach the claimed limitations in biometric authentication systems.
