technology — European UPC Patent Cases
1,511 decisions indexed
Page 50 of 51 · 1,511 total
10xGenomics, Inc., President and Fellows of Harvard College v.NanoString Technologies Inc.
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-10-26) under reference UPC-001687, 10xGenomics, Inc., President and Fellows of Harvard College appeared in dispute with NanoString Technologies Inc. concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
AIM Sport Vision AG v.Supponor Oy, Limited, SASU, España SL, Italia SRL
In this legal proceeding before Helsinki (FI) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-10-20) under reference UPC-001689, AIM Sport Vision AG appeared in dispute with Supponor Oy, Limited, SASU, España SL, Italia SRL concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
Plant-e Knowledge B.V., Plant-e B.V. v.Arkyne Technologies S.L.
This document is uploaded for technical (CMS ) reasons only, in order to close the workflow. Margot Elsa KOKKE Digitally signed by Margot Elsa KOKKE Date: 2024.12.13 17:26:00 +01'00'
myStromer AG v.Revolt Zycling AG
In this legal proceeding before Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-10-18) under reference UPC-001690, myStromer AG appeared in dispute with Revolt Zycling AG concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
OCADO INNOVATION LIMITED v.AUTOSTORE AS
In this legal proceeding before Nordic Baltic Regional Division (decision issued on 2023-10-17) under reference UPC-001692, OCADO INNOVATION LIMITED appeared in dispute with AUTOSTORE AS concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Sanofi-Aventis Groupe S.A., Sanofi Winthrop Industrie S.A., Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. v.Amgen, Inc.
This appeal before the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court concerned the date of service of a Statement of claim and the extension of procedural deadlines. The appellants (Sanofi entities and Regeneron) challenged a procedural order of the Munich Local Division that had rejected their request to recalculate the deadlines for lodging a Preliminary objection and Statement of defense based on the later availability of Annexes. The Court of Appeal set aside the impugned order, holding that while a Statement of claim without Annexes can be validly served under Rule 271 RoP, non-compliance with Rule 13.2 RoP (requiring simultaneous upload of Annexes) constitutes a reasoned request for extension of the terms under Rules 19.1 and 23 RoP.
ASTELLAS INSTITUTE FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE v.HELIOS K.K, RIKEN, OSAKA UNIVERSITY
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Central Division - Section (decision issued on 2023-10-11) under reference UPC-001695, ASTELLAS INSTITUTE FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE appeared in dispute with HELIOS K.K, RIKEN, OSAKA UNIVERSITY concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
ASTELLAS INSTITUTE FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE v.HELIOS K.K, RIKEN
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Central Division - Section (decision issued on 2023-10-11) under reference UPC-001694, ASTELLAS INSTITUTE FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE appeared in dispute with HELIOS K.K, RIKEN concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
AGFA NV v.Gucci
In this legal proceeding before Hamburg (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-10-04) under reference UPC-001698, AGFA NV appeared in dispute with Gucci concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
President and Fellows of Harvard College v.NanoString Technologies Europe Limited
NanoString Technologies Europe Limited filed an action for revocation of European Patent 2 794 928 against Harvard before the Munich Section of the Central Division of the Court of First Instance. The Central Division revoked the patent entirely and ordered Harvard to bear NanoString's legal costs, prompting Harvard to appeal. After the appeal was filed, NanoString applied to withdraw the action, refrain from a cost decision, and release the security deposit of €300,000 it had previously provided.
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v.Meril GmbH
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-09-29) under reference UPC-001701, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation appeared in dispute with Meril GmbH concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
Philips IP Ventures B.V. v.Edrich u.a.
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-09-27) under reference UPC-001704, Philips IP Ventures B.V. appeared in dispute with Edrich u.a. concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v.Edrich u.a.
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-09-27) under reference UPC-001703, Koninklijke Philips N.V. appeared in dispute with Edrich u.a. concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
Oerlikon textiles GmbH & Co KG v.Himson Engineering Private Limited
In this legal proceeding before Milan (IT) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-09-27) under reference UPC-001702, Oerlikon textiles GmbH & Co KG appeared in dispute with Himson Engineering Private Limited concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
N.V. Nutricia v.Nestlé Health Science (Deutschland) GmbH
This case before the Local Division Düsseldorf concerned European Patent EP 2 359 858 B1, which was finally revoked during the proceedings. The Claimant (N.V. Nutricia) sought closure of both the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation, while the parties disputed the value of the dispute. The Court set the value of the infringement action at €250,000 and the counterclaim for revocation at €500,000, ordered the Claimant to bear the costs of both proceedings, and granted a 60% reimbursement of court fees to the Claimant.
*** v.OrthoApnea S.L.
Lokale afdeling Brussel Bevel van het gerecht van eerste aanleg van het Eengemaakt Octrooigerecht (UPC) Lokale afdeling te Brussel Gegeven op 21 september 2023 Betreffende EP 2 331 036 Bevel ex R.192 RoP tot bescherming van bewijsmateriaal en het maken van een beschrijving
NanoString Technologies Inc., NanoStrings Technologies Germany GmbH, NanoString Technologies Netherlands B.V. v.10x Genomics, Inc., President and Fellows of Harvard College
This case concerns a request for provisional measures filed by 10x Genomics, Inc. and President and Fellows of Harvard College against NanoString Technologies entities before the Local Division Munich, alleging direct and indirect infringement of unitary patent EP 4 108 782. The court addressed key legal questions regarding the standard of certainty required for patent validity in provisional measure proceedings, the assessment of unreasonable delay in seeking such measures, and whether separate national enforcement of a non-unitary European patent constitutes an equivalent remedy to UPC enforcement. The decision was issued on 19 September 2023 following oral hearings on 5 and 6 September 2023.
OCADO INNOVATION LIMITED v.AUTOSTORE AS
In this legal proceeding before Nordic Baltic Regional Division (decision issued on 2023-09-08) under reference UPC-001712, OCADO INNOVATION LIMITED appeared in dispute with AUTOSTORE AS concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v.Meril GmbH
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-08-28) under reference UPC-001717, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation appeared in dispute with Meril GmbH concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
AIM Sport Vision AG v.Supponor Oy, Supponor Limited, Supponor SASU, Supponor Italia SRL, Supponor España SL
In this legal proceeding before Helsinki (FI) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-08-28) under reference UPC-001714, AIM Sport Vision AG appeared in dispute with Supponor Oy, Supponor Limited, Supponor SASU, Supponor Italia SRL, Supponor España SL concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v.Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd.
This procedural order concerns an infringement action regarding European patent EP 3 646 825 before the Local Division Munich. The Defendants (Meril) filed late applications requesting the Court to approach the European Commission regarding ongoing antitrust investigations into the Claimant (Edwards Lifesciences) and to reopen the written procedure. The Court rejected the requests as untimely, finding they were filed after the closure of the written procedure and the oral hearing, and noted that no formal investigation had been opened by the European Commission.
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v.Meril GmbH, Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd.
This case concerns a procedural dispute in damages proceedings before the Local Division Munich of the Unified Patent Court. Following a final 2025 decision finding that the Meril entities infringed Edwards Lifesciences' European patent EP 3 669 828, Edwards sought a deadline extension for filing its reply to Meril's defence because its UPC representative was not notified when the sub-registry changed the confidentiality status of documents. The court granted a limited two-day extension, finding Edwards' representative should have inquired with the sub-registry by 17 June 2026, but acknowledged that the CMS's lack of automatic notifications needed to be addressed.
Plant-e Knowledge B.V., Plant-e B.V. v.Arkyne Technologies S.L.
This document is uploaded for technical (CMS ) reasons only, in order to close the workflow. Margot Elsa KOKKE Digitally signed by Margot Elsa KOKKE Date: 2024.12.13 17:26:00 +01'00'
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v.Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd.
This procedural order concerns an infringement action regarding European patent EP 3 646 825 before the Local Division Munich. The Defendants (Meril) filed late applications requesting the Court to approach the European Commission regarding ongoing antitrust investigations into the Claimant (Edwards Lifesciences) and to reopen the written procedure. The Court rejected the requests as untimely, finding they were filed after the closure of the written procedure and the oral hearing, and noted that no formal investigation had been opened by the European Commission.
Himson Engineering Private Limited v.Respondent
1 Milan - Local Division UPC_CFI_240/2023 Procedural Order of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court delivered on 27/11/2024 Order no. ORD_63173/2024 APPLICANT (defendant in the main proceeding) Himson Engineering Private Limited Represented by Fabrizio Jacobacci
Oerlikon Textile GmbH & CO KG v.Bhagat Group
In this legal proceeding before Milan (IT) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-07-21) under reference UPC-001730, Oerlikon Textile GmbH & CO KG appeared in dispute with Bhagat Group concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
AIM Sport Vision AG v.Supponor Oy
In this legal proceeding before Helsinki (FI) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-07-17) under reference UPC-001732, AIM Sport Vision AG appeared in dispute with Supponor Oy concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
10x Genomics, Inc. v.NanoString Technologies Inc.
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-07-10) under reference UPC-001734, 10x Genomics, Inc. appeared in dispute with NanoString Technologies Inc. concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
10x Genomics, Inc. v.NanoString Technologies Inc.
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-07-06) under reference UPC-001735, 10x Genomics, Inc. appeared in dispute with NanoString Technologies Inc. concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v.S.G.E.
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-07-05) under reference UPC-001738, Koninklijke Philips N.V. appeared in dispute with S.G.E. concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.