322 cases · page 11 of 11
Showing 301–321Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v.Netgear Inc./Netgear Deutschland GmbH/Netgear International Limited
This case concerns a patent infringement action brought by Huawei Technologies against three NETGEAR entities regarding European Patents EP 3 611 989 and EP 3 678 321. The central procedural issue was whether to change the procedural language from German to English, given that both patents were granted in English and two members of the panel were not native German speakers. While the defendants consented to a full language change and the plaintiff opposed it but was open to conducting the oral hearing in English, the presiding judge ordered that the oral hearing be conducted in English while keeping the procedural language as German.
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v.Netgear Inc., Netgear Deutschland GmbH, Netgear International Limited
This order concerns a patent infringement action brought by Huawei Technologies against three NETGEAR entities regarding European Patents EP 3 611 989 and EP 3 678 321, both granted in English. The court addressed whether to change the procedural language from German to English, and whether the oral hearing should be conducted in English. The defendants consented to a change of language to English, while the plaintiff opposed a full change but was open to conducting the oral hearing in English. The presiding judge ultimately ordered that the oral hearing be conducted in English, applying the flexibility principles of Rule 1.1 RoP.
Philips IP Ventures B.V. v.Edrich u.a.
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2024-01-03) under reference UPC-001644, Philips IP Ventures B.V. appeared in dispute with Edrich u.a. concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v.Edrich u.a.
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2024-01-03) under reference UPC-001643, Koninklijke Philips N.V. appeared in dispute with Edrich u.a. concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
Amagen Inc. v.Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland, Sanofi -Aventis Groupe S.A., Sanofi Winthrop Industrie S.A., Regeneron pharmaceuticals Inc.
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2024-01-02) under reference UPC-001647, Amagen Inc. appeared in dispute with Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland, Sanofi -Aventis Groupe S.A., Sanofi Winthrop Industrie S.A., Regeneron pharmaceuticals Inc. concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
10xGenomics Inc., President and Fellows of Harvard College v.NanoString Technologies Inc. et al.
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-12-05) under reference UPC-001668, 10xGenomics Inc., President and Fellows of Harvard College appeared in dispute with NanoString Technologies Inc. et al. concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
Panasonic Holdings Corporation v.Xiaomi Inc. et al.
Panasonic Holdings Corporation filed a patent infringement action against ten Xiaomi-related defendants concerning European Patent EP 3 024 163. The present order addressed Panasonic's application for document production against itself, accompanied by a request for confidentiality protection. The court issued a final consolidated confidentiality order, accepting most of the defendants' requested modifications to the provisional order, including clarifying the scope of legal representatives, expanding access to three named reliable persons, removing the return/destruction obligation, and setting a penalty of up to 100,000 EUR per culpable violation.
10xGenomics, Inc., President and Fellows of Harvard College v.NanoString Technologies Inc.
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-10-26) under reference UPC-001687, 10xGenomics, Inc., President and Fellows of Harvard College appeared in dispute with NanoString Technologies Inc. concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v.Meril GmbH
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-09-29) under reference UPC-001701, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation appeared in dispute with Meril GmbH concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
Philips IP Ventures B.V. v.Edrich u.a.
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-09-27) under reference UPC-001704, Philips IP Ventures B.V. appeared in dispute with Edrich u.a. concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v.Edrich u.a.
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-09-27) under reference UPC-001703, Koninklijke Philips N.V. appeared in dispute with Edrich u.a. concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
NanoString Technologies Inc., NanoStrings Technologies Germany GmbH, NanoString Technologies Netherlands B.V. v.10x Genomics, Inc., President and Fellows of Harvard College
This case concerns a request for provisional measures filed by 10x Genomics, Inc. and President and Fellows of Harvard College against NanoString Technologies entities before the Local Division Munich, alleging direct and indirect infringement of unitary patent EP 4 108 782. The court addressed key legal questions regarding the standard of certainty required for patent validity in provisional measure proceedings, the assessment of unreasonable delay in seeking such measures, and whether separate national enforcement of a non-unitary European patent constitutes an equivalent remedy to UPC enforcement. The decision was issued on 19 September 2023 following oral hearings on 5 and 6 September 2023.
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v.Meril GmbH
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-08-28) under reference UPC-001717, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation appeared in dispute with Meril GmbH concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v.Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd.
This procedural order concerns an infringement action regarding European patent EP 3 646 825 before the Local Division Munich. The Defendants (Meril) filed late applications requesting the Court to approach the European Commission regarding ongoing antitrust investigations into the Claimant (Edwards Lifesciences) and to reopen the written procedure. The Court rejected the requests as untimely, finding they were filed after the closure of the written procedure and the oral hearing, and noted that no formal investigation had been opened by the European Commission.
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v.Meril GmbH, Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd.
This case concerns a procedural dispute in damages proceedings before the Local Division Munich of the Unified Patent Court. Following a final 2025 decision finding that the Meril entities infringed Edwards Lifesciences' European patent EP 3 669 828, Edwards sought a deadline extension for filing its reply to Meril's defence because its UPC representative was not notified when the sub-registry changed the confidentiality status of documents. The court granted a limited two-day extension, finding Edwards' representative should have inquired with the sub-registry by 17 June 2026, but acknowledged that the CMS's lack of automatic notifications needed to be addressed.
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v.Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd.
This procedural order concerns an infringement action regarding European patent EP 3 646 825 before the Local Division Munich. The Defendants (Meril) filed late applications requesting the Court to approach the European Commission regarding ongoing antitrust investigations into the Claimant (Edwards Lifesciences) and to reopen the written procedure. The Court rejected the requests as untimely, finding they were filed after the closure of the written procedure and the oral hearing, and noted that no formal investigation had been opened by the European Commission.
10x Genomics, Inc. v.NanoString Technologies Inc.
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-07-10) under reference UPC-001734, 10x Genomics, Inc. appeared in dispute with NanoString Technologies Inc. concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
10x Genomics, Inc. v.NanoString Technologies Inc.
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-07-06) under reference UPC-001735, 10x Genomics, Inc. appeared in dispute with NanoString Technologies Inc. concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v.S.G.E.
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-07-05) under reference UPC-001738, Koninklijke Philips N.V. appeared in dispute with S.G.E. concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
10x Genomics, Inc. v.NanoString Technologies Inc.
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-06-30) under reference UPC-001741, 10x Genomics, Inc. appeared in dispute with NanoString Technologies Inc. concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
10x Genomics, Inc. v.NanoString Technologies Inc.
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-06-27) under reference UPC-001744, 10x Genomics, Inc. appeared in dispute with NanoString Technologies Inc. concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
10x Genomics, Inc. v.NanoString Technologies Inc.
In this legal proceeding before Munich (DE) Local Division (decision issued on 2023-06-23) under reference UPC-001748, 10x Genomics, Inc. appeared in dispute with NanoString Technologies Inc. concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
Facing a similar IP matter?
Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.