Litigation
72 litigation decisions from Milan (IT) Local Division.
Litigation Decisions
72 cases | Page 3 of 3
Progress Maschinen & Automation AG v.AWM S.r.l. and Schnell S.p.A.
Progress Maschinen & Automation AG (PMA) sought ex parte orders to preserve evidence and inspect the premises of AWM S.r.l. and Schnell S.p.A. for alleged infringement of European Patent EP 2726230. After the orders were executed in October 2023, PMA failed to commence proceedings on the merits within the prescribed time limits and only requested access to the expert report in February 2024. The Local Division in Milan held the application for disclosure inadmissible, revoked the provisional measures, ordered restitution of the evidence, and awarded EUR 10,000 in legal fees against PMA.
*** v.PROGRESS MASCHINEN & AUTOMATION AG, AWMS.R.L., SCHNELL S.P.A.
Unified Patent Court decision.
*** v.PROGRESS MASCHINEN & AUTOMATION AG, AWMS.R.L., SCHNELL S.P.A.
Unified Patent Court decision.
Oerlikon textiles GmbH & Co KG v.Himson Engineering Private Limited
Unified Patent Court decision.
PROGRESS MASCHINEN & AUTOMATION AG v.AWM S.R.L., SCHNELL S.P.A.
Unified Patent Court decision.
Himson Engineering Private Limited v.Ex Parte
Unified Patent Court decision.
Oerlikon Textile GmbH & CO KG v.Bhagat Group
Unified Patent Court decision.
OCADO INNOVATION LIMITED v.AUTOSTORE AS
Unified Patent Court decision.
OCADO INNOVATION LIMITED v.AUTOSTORE AS
Unified Patent Court decision.
OERLIKON TEXTILE G.M.B.H. & CO. K.G. v.BHAGAT GROUP
Unified Patent Court decision.
OERLIKON TEXTILE GMBH & CO KG v.Himson Engineering Private Limited
Unified Patent Court decision.
OERLIKON TEXTILE G.M.B.H. & CO. K.G v.HIMSON ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED
Unified Patent Court decision.
Facing a similar IP matter?
Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.