73 cases · page 3 of 3
Showing 61–72Daedalus Prime LLC v.Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd., Xiaomi Inc., Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V., Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH, and MediaTek Inc.
This procedural order from the Hamburg Local Division of the Unified Patent Court concerned a dispute over the method of serving process on three defendants domiciled outside the contracting member states. The claimant sought to serve Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd., Xiaomi Inc., and MediaTek Inc. via their respective German branch offices under Rule 271.5(a) RoP. The court dismissed the request, holding that service on defendants domiciled outside the contracting member states must follow Rules 273 and 274 RoP, requiring first an attempt at service under the Hague Service Convention or diplomatic channels.
Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE and Tesla Germany GmbH v.Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited
This is a confidentiality order issued by the Local Chamber Hamburg in a patent infringement action concerning European Patent EP1612910. The defendants (Tesla entities) sought to have certain information in their Rejoinder, specifically projected sales results for a potential twelve-month enforcement period, classified as trade secrets with restricted access under Rule 262A of the Rules of Procedure. The court granted the application, restricting access to the claimant's legal representatives and three named persons employed at Broadcom Inc., replacing the earlier preliminary order of 11 March 2024.
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited v.Tesla Germany GmbH and Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE
This is a procedural order from the Local Chamber of the Unified Patent Court in Hamburg concerning a patent infringement action (UPC_CFI_54/2023) involving European Patent EP1612910 held by Avago Technologies. The defendants (Tesla entities) sought a confidentiality order under Rule 262A of the Rules of Procedure to protect projected sales result information contained in their rejoinder. The court granted the application, declaring the information strictly confidential and limiting access to the claimant's legal representatives and three named persons employed at Broadcom Inc.
Fives ECL, SAS v.REEl GmbH
Unified Patent Court decision.
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited v.Tesla Germany GmbH
Unified Patent Court decision.
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limitet v.Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE/Tesla Germany GmbH
Unified Patent Court decision.
Fives ECL, SAS v.REEL GmbH
Unified Patent Court decision.
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited v.Tesla Germany GmbH
Unified Patent Court decision.
10x Genomics, Inc. , President and Fellows of Harvard College v.Vizgen, Inc.
Unified Patent Court decision.
10x Genomics, Inc. and President and Fellows of Harvard College v.Vizgen, Inc.
This case before the Local Chamber Hamburg concerned a patent infringement action regarding EP4108782. The defendant Vizgen sought review under Rule 333.1 of an order by the presiding judge that had partially rejected its requests for production of documents disclosed in parallel US proceedings. The full panel granted most of the production requests, ordering the plaintiffs to disclose specific emails, an FAQ document, and a deposition transcript, while treating them as confidential information accessible only to legal counsel.
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited v.Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE/Tesla Germany GmbH
Unified Patent Court decision.
AGFA NV v.Gucci
Unified Patent Court decision.
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited v.Tesla Germany GmbH, Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE
Unified Patent Court decision.
Facing a similar IP matter?
Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.