Outcome Category

Litigation

at Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division

64 litigation decisions from Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division.

Litigation Decisions

64 cases | Page 3 of 3

patent LITIGATION · Apr 7, 2026

Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd, Orope Germany GmbH v.Koninklijke KPN N.V

Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division · UPC_CFI_249/2026 UPC_CFI_249/2026 Full Details

Infringement Action

patent LITIGATION · Apr 7, 2026

Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd, Orope Germany GmbH v.Koninklijke KPN N.V

Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division · UPC_AF74BADDDC

This order concerns a procedural application by the defendants (Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd and Orope Germany GmbH) to change the language of proceedings from German to English in an infringement action brought by Koninklijke KPN N.V. based on European patent EP 3349412. The claimant agreed to the language change but requested three weeks to provide English translations of the Statement of Claim and certain annexes, while the defendants requested two weeks. The President of the Court of First Instance ordered the language change to English and addressed the translation timeline.

patent LITIGATION · Apr 1, 2026

Yangtze Memory Technologies Co., Ltd. v.Micron Technology, Inc. a.o.

Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division · UPC_CFI_1034/2025; UPC_CFI_931/2026 UPC_CFI_1034/2025; UPC_CFI_931/2026 Full Details

Application RoP262A

patent LITIGATION · Apr 1, 2026

Yangtze Memory Technologies Co., Ltd. v.Micron Technology, Inc. a.o.

Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division · UPC_99FFC40F66

This is a procedural order from the Düsseldorf Local Division concerning EP 3 850 660, in which Yangtze Memory Technologies Co., Ltd. filed three infringement actions against four Micron entities on 6 October 2025. Defendants 2 to 4 requested an extension of time periods for lodging preliminary objections and filing the statement of defence, citing the exceptionally large scope of the litigation campaign and the extensive technical evidence submitted by the Claimant. The Claimant objected, arguing that the technical reports had been known to the counterparties since 2024 and that global coordination did not justify delay. The Court granted the extension, setting the deadline for preliminary objections at 24 November 2025 for all Defendants and extending the deadline for the statement of defence and any counterclaim for revocation to 16 March 2026.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a similar IP matter?

Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.

Consult our team →