European UPC IP Litigation
2,007 annotated decisions
Page 72 of 84 · 2,007 total
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited v.Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE/Tesla Germany GmbH
Unified Patent Court decision.
AGFA NV v.Gucci
Unified Patent Court decision.
President and Fellows of Harvard College v.NanoString Technologies Europe Limited
Unified Patent Court decision.
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v.Netgear Inc./Netgear Deutschland GmbH/Netgear International Limited
Unified Patent Court decision.
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v.Meril GmbH
Unified Patent Court decision.
Philips IP Ventures B.V. v.Edrich u.a.
Unified Patent Court decision.
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v.Edrich u.a.
Unified Patent Court decision.
Oerlikon textiles GmbH & Co KG v.Himson Engineering Private Limited
Unified Patent Court decision.
PROGRESS MASCHINEN & AUTOMATION AG v.AWM S.R.L., SCHNELL S.P.A.
Unified Patent Court decision.
N.V. Nutricia v.Nestlé Health Science (Deutschland) GmbH
Unified Patent Court decision.
Patent Holder (Mr. ***) v.OrthoApnea S.L.
The Local Division Brussels of the Unified Patent Court granted an ex parte order under Rule 192 RoP for the preservation of evidence and description of evidence in favor of the holder of European Patent EP 2 331 036 B1 (titled 'Device for treating night time breathing problems') against OrthoApnea S.L. The applicant alleged that OrthoApnea's NOA products infringed claims 1, 9, and 10 of EP 036 and sought urgent measures to seize evidence at the iBEDSSMA symposium in Knokke-Heist on September 22-23, 2023, where OrthoApnea was expected to exhibit its products as a Gold Sponsor.
ASTELLAS INSTITUTE FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE v.HEALIOS K.K, RIKEN, OSAKA UNIVERSITY
Unified Patent Court decision.
Amgen, Inc. v.Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
Unified Patent Court decision.
10x Genomics, Inc. and President and Fellows of Harvard College v.NanoString Technologies Inc., NanoString Technologies Germany GmbH, and NanoString Technologies Netherlands B.V.
The Local Division Munich of the Unified Patent Court considered a request for provisional measures filed by 10x Genomics and Harvard College alleging direct and indirect infringement of unitary patent EP 4 108 782 by NanoString entities through their CosMx Spatial Molecular Imager and related products. The court found that the claimants had established a preponderant likelihood of validity and infringement with respect to certain claims, and granted the provisional measures in part while dismissing them in other respects. The defendants were ordered to cease certain infringing activities, subject to penalty payments of up to EUR 250,000 per infringement, and were ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings.
CUP&CINO Kaffeesystem-Vertrieb GmbH & Co. KG v.ALPINA COFFEE SYSTEMS GmbH
Unified Patent Court decision.
OCADO INNOVATION LIMITED v.AUTOSTORE AS
Unified Patent Court decision.
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v.Amgen, Inc.
Unified Patent Court decision.
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v.Meril GmbH
Unified Patent Court decision.
AIM Sport Vision AG v.Supponor Oy, Supponor Limited, Supponor SASU, Supponor Italia SRL, Supponor España SL
Unified Patent Court decision.
AIM Sport Vision AG v.Supponor Oy, Supponor Limited, Supponor SASU, Supponor Italia SRL, Supponor España SL
Unified Patent Court decision.
AIM Sport Vision AG v.Supponor Oy, Supponor Limited, Supponor SASU, Supponor Italia SRL, Supponor España SL
Unified Patent Court decision.
Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE, Tesla Germany u.a. v.Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited
Unified Patent Court decision.
Amgen, Inc. v.Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
Unified Patent Court decision.
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v.Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd.
Unified Patent Court decision.