European UPC IP Litigation
2,007 annotated decisions
Page 70 of 84 · 2,007 total
KraussMaffei Extrusion GmbH v.TROESTER GmbH & Co. KG
Unified Patent Court decision.
Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. v.Dexcom Inc. and Dexcom International Limited
This is an infringement proceeding before the Unified Patent Court concerning European Patent EP4070727. The court addressed the issue of service of process on Dexcom International Limited, which had failed by registered letter at both addresses provided. Abbott submitted evidence that effective service had been accomplished by an Irish process server on 20 December 2023, rendering the alternative service application moot.
SES-imagotag SA v.Hanshow Technology Co. Ltd. Et al.
Unified Patent Court decision.
Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd. and OROPE Germany GmbH v.Panasonic Holdings Corporation
The Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court rejected the Appellants' (OPPO and OROPE) request for expedition of appeal proceedings. The Appellants had sought a shortened deadline for the Respondent's (Panasonic) Statement of response in connection with their appeal against an order rejecting their application to change the language of proceedings from German to English. The Court held that granting the request would unfairly prejudice the Respondent's right to prepare its response, outweighing the Appellants' interest in filing their Statement of defence in English before the 22 December 2023 deadline.
N.V. Nutricia v.Nestlé Health Science (Deutschland) GmbH
Unified Patent Court decision.
Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd. & OROPE Germany GmbH v.Panasonic Holdings Corporation
The Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court dismissed the Appellants' (OPPO and OROPE) request for expedition of appeal proceedings and shortening of the time period for the Respondent to lodge a Statement of response. The Appellants had appealed an order of the Court of First Instance rejecting their application to change the language of proceedings from German to English, and sought an expedited decision before 22 December 2023, the deadline for filing their Statement of defence in the main proceedings.
N.V. Nutricia v.Nestlé Health Science (Deutschland) GmbH
Unified Patent Court decision.
Meril GmbH v.Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
Unified Patent Court decision.
Dexcom, Inc. v.Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Diabetes Care inc, Abbott France, Abbott NV/SA, Abbott B.V, Abbott S.r.l, Abbott Sacandinavia Aktiebolag, Abbott GmbH, Abbott Diagnostics Gmbh, Abbott Logistics B.V
Unified Patent Court decision.
HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P v.LAMA FRANCE
Unified Patent Court decision.
Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd. and OROPE Germany GmbH v.Panasonic Holdings Corporation
The Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court dismissed the Appellants' (OPPO and OROPE) request for expedition of their appeal against a Court of First Instance order rejecting their application to change the language of proceedings from German to English. The Court held that granting the request would give the Respondent only four working days to respond, insufficiently accounting for the Respondent's interests and the principles of proportionality, fairness, and equity.
N.V. Nutricia v.Nestle Health
Unified Patent Court decision.
Ocado Innovation Limited v.Autostore companies
Unified Patent Court decision.
Ortovox Sportartikel GmbH v.Mammut Sports Group AG, Mammut Sports Group GmbH
Unified Patent Court decision.
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v.Netgear Inc., Netgear Deutschland GmbH, Netgear International Limited
Unified Patent Court decision.
Netgear Deutschland GmbH, Netgear Inc., Netgear International Limited v.Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.
Unified Patent Court decision.
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v.Netgear Inc., Netgear Deutschland GmbH, Netgear International Limited
Unified Patent Court decision.
Panasonic Holding Corporation v.Xiaomi Techniligy Germany GmbH
Unified Patent Court decision.
10xGenomics Inc., President and Fellows of Harvard College v.NanoString Technologies Inc. et al.
Unified Patent Court decision.
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited v.Tesla Germany GmbH
Unified Patent Court decision.
*** v.PROGRESS MASCHINEN & AUTOMATION AG, AWMS.R.L., SCHNELL S.P.A.
Unified Patent Court decision.
Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. v.Expert e-Commerce GmbH u. a.
Unified Patent Court decision.
*** v.PROGRESS MASCHINEN & AUTOMATION AG, AWMS.R.L., SCHNELL S.P.A.
Unified Patent Court decision.
Panasonic Holdings Corporation v.Xiaomi Inc. et al.
Unified Patent Court decision.