Trademark Cases

1,271 decisions across India

India 1,271

Page 3 of 43

trademark settled · Oct 22, 2025

M/s.Sri Narasu'S Coffee Company Pvt.Ltd. v.S.Sudhakar and S.Dinakar (Partners of M/s.Shri Lakshmi Agro Foods)

Madras High Court · OP(TM) No. 57 of 2025

M/s.Sri Narasu'S Coffee Company Pvt.Ltd. had filed a petition seeking the rectification and cancellation of the trademark 'Udhaiyam,' registered by S.Sudhakar and S.Dinakar under Application No.1359359 in Class 29. However, both parties subsequently entered into a Memorandum of Compromise dated October 10, 2025. Consequently, the Madras High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, resolving the dispute amicably.
trademark settled · Oct 22, 2025

M/s.Sri Narasu'S Coffee Company Pvt.Ltd. v.S.Sudhakar and S.Dinakar (Partners of M/s.Shri Lakshmi Agro Foods)

Madras High Court · OP(TM) No. 57 of 2025

M/s.Sri Narasu'S Coffee Company Pvt.Ltd. had filed a petition seeking the rectification and cancellation of the trademark 'Udhaiyam,' registered by S.Sudhakar and S.Dinakar under Application No.1359359 in Class 29. However, both parties subsequently entered into a Memorandum of Compromise dated October 10, 2025. Consequently, the Madras High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, resolving the dispute amicably.
trademark dismissed · Oct 22, 2025

M/s.Sri Narasu'S Coffee Company Pvt. Ltd. v.S.Sudhakar and S.Dinakar (Partners of M/s.Shri Lakshmi Agro Foods)

Madras High Court · OP(TM) No. 54 of 2025

M/s.Sri Narasu'S Coffee Company Pvt. Ltd. filed a petition seeking the cancellation and rectification of the trademark 'Udhaiyam,' registered by S.Sudhakar and S.Dinakar under Application No.1359360 in Class 30. However, both parties subsequently entered into a Memorandum of Compromise. Consequently, the Madras High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, allowing the dispute to be resolved amicably between the involved parties.
trademark dismissed · Oct 22, 2025

M/s.Sri Narasu'S Coffee Company Pvt. Ltd. v.S.Sudhakar and S.Dinakar (Partners of M/s.Shri Lakshmi Agro Foods)

Madras High Court · OP(TM) No. 54 of 2025

M/s.Sri Narasu'S Coffee Company Pvt. Ltd. filed a petition seeking the cancellation and rectification of the trademark 'Udhaiyam,' registered by S.Sudhakar and S.Dinakar under Application No.1359360 in Class 30. However, both parties subsequently entered into a Memorandum of Compromise. Consequently, the Madras High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, allowing the dispute to be resolved amicably between the involved parties.
trademark plaintiff favorable · Oct 14, 2025

Bisleri International Private Limited v.Yogesh Chaurasia

Bombay High Court · 8-IA-1090-2025 (OS)

The Bombay High Court granted an interim injunction in favor of Bisleri International Private Limited against Yogesh Chaurasia. The court found prima facie evidence that the defendant was passing off their packaged drinking water as being associated with the plaintiff. Specifically, the judge noted that the defendant's mark 'BRISLEI,' labels (OXY FINE and BILIFE), bottle design/shape, and even the green cap were substantially similar to Bisleri's distinctive trade dress. This ruling provides immediate protection to Bisleri while the main suit proceeds.
trademark plaintiff favorable · Oct 14, 2025

Le Shark Apparel Limited v.Anil Shah And 2 Ors

Bombay High Court · 2025:BHC-OS:18797

The Bombay High Court granted rectification to remove a registered trademark (No. 466002) belonging to the Respondents, which was identical to the Petitioner's established global mark 'LE SHARK'. The court found that the Respondents had fraudulently adopted the mark and lacked evidence of genuine use, thereby allowing the Petitioner to proceed with its brand in India. This decision reinforces the principle that a trademark register must maintain purity against deceptive or fraudulent registrations.
trademark plaintiff favorable · Oct 13, 2025

Ardo Medical Ag v.Ms Sdb International And Anr.

Delhi High Court · C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 92/2025

Ardo Medical Ag successfully petitioned the Delhi High Court to rectify the Trade Marks Register, seeking cancellation of a conflicting trademark registered by Ms Sdb International. The court found that Respondent No. 1 engaged in bad faith and trade mark squatting by registering an identical mark despite Ardo's prior use and global registrations. Consequently, the Registrar was directed to remove the infringing trademark from the register.
trademark plaintiff favorable · Oct 13, 2025

M/S. Aquapump Industries & Anr. v.Ravi Yadav & Anr.

Delhi High Court - Orders · C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 66/2025

The Delhi High Court allowed a petition seeking rectification regarding a specific trademark registration. Following submissions from both parties, the court directed the cancellation of Trademark Registration No. 6100995 for the mark in Class 11. This order mandates the trademark registry to rectify its records accordingly within four weeks, effectively clearing the title and resolving the dispute between M/S. Aquapump Industries and Ravi Yadav.
trademark interim order · Oct 9, 2025

Caterpillar Inc v.Gold Filter And Co And Another

Delhi High Court - Orders · CS(COMM) 1078/2025

Caterpillar Inc filed a suit seeking permanent injunction against Gold Filter And Co for infringing several of its Patents related to fluid filter systems used in construction machinery. The court passed an order granting various procedural exemptions sought by the Plaintiff, including exemption from pre-institution Mediation and advance service, and appointed a Local Commissioner to inspect the alleged infringing parts.
trademark settled · Sep 25, 2025

Aculife Healthcare Private Limited v.Auspharma Private Limited

Madras High Court · OP(TM)No.34 of 2025

The Madras High Court disposed of OP(TM)No.34 of 2025, which sought rectification of a trademark registration. Although listed for reporting settlement, the court formally accepted and gave effect to a Memorandum of Compromise (MOC) between Aculife Healthcare Private Limited and Auspharma Private Limited. The judgment confirmed that the MOC would form part of the order, effectively resolving the dispute without further litigation.
trademark settled · Sep 25, 2025

Aculife Healthcare Private Limited v.Auspharma Private Limited

Madras High Court · OP(TM)No.34 of 2025

The Madras High Court disposed of OP(TM)No.34 of 2025, which sought rectification of a trademark registration. Although listed for reporting settlement, the court formally accepted and gave effect to a Memorandum of Compromise (MOC) between Aculife Healthcare Private Limited and Auspharma Private Limited. The judgment confirmed that the MOC would form part of the order, effectively resolving the dispute without further litigation.
trademark settled · Sep 25, 2025

Aculife Healthcare Private Limited v.Auspharma Private Limited

Madras High Court · OP(TM)No.34 of 2025

The Madras High Court disposed of OP(TM)No.34 of 2025, which sought rectification of a trademark registration. Although listed for reporting settlement, the court formally accepted and gave effect to a Memorandum of Compromise (MOC) between Aculife Healthcare Private Limited and Auspharma Private Limited. The judgment confirmed that the MOC would form part of the order, effectively resolving the dispute without further litigation.
trademark settled · Sep 25, 2025

Aculife Healthcare Private Limited v.Auspharma Private Limited

Madras High Court · OP(TM)No.34 of 2025

The Madras High Court disposed of OP(TM)No.34 of 2025, which sought rectification of a trademark registration. Although listed for reporting settlement, the court formally accepted and gave effect to a Memorandum of Compromise (MOC) between Aculife Healthcare Private Limited and Auspharma Private Limited. The judgment confirmed that the MOC would form part of the order, effectively resolving the dispute without further litigation.
trademark settled · Sep 25, 2025

Aculife Healthcare Private Limited v.Auspharma Private Limited

Madras High Court · OP(TM)No.34 of 2025

The Madras High Court disposed of OP(TM)No.34 of 2025, which sought rectification of a trademark registration. Although listed for reporting settlement, the court formally accepted and gave effect to a Memorandum of Compromise (MOC) between Aculife Healthcare Private Limited and Auspharma Private Limited. The judgment confirmed that the MOC would form part of the order, effectively resolving the dispute without further litigation.
trademark plaintiff favorable · Sep 24, 2025

Danone Asia Pacific Holdings Pte. Ltd. v.Syed Jawed Mohsin & Another

Calcutta High Court · IPDATM/5/2024

The Calcutta High Court allowed Danone Asia Pacific Holdings Pte. Ltd.'s application for the cancellation and rectification of the mark 'PROTIFIX'. The court found that PROTIFIX was deceptively similar to the petitioner's established trademark, PROTINEX, both visually and phonetically, leading to a high likelihood of consumer confusion in the healthcare goods market. Furthermore, the respondent failed to provide credible evidence of genuine use for the impugned mark, satisfying the grounds for cancellation under Section 47 of the Act.
trademark mixed · Sep 17, 2025

Parth Formulation Pvt Ltd v.Paam Biotech Private Limited

Delhi High Court - Orders · CS(COMM) 1210/2024

In a passing-off dispute concerning pharmaceutical packaging, the Delhi High Court found prima facie that the defendants' packaging was deceptively similar to the plaintiff's. While the court noted the parties were open to settlement, it directed Paam Biotech to change its packaging color away from red and mandated Parth Formulation to submit sales data for the past three years.
trademark plaintiff favorable · Sep 15, 2025

Marc Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v.Marc Sanitation Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Delhi High Court - Orders · C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 91/2025

The Delhi High Court granted the petition filed by Marc Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., directing the rectification of Trademark Registration No. 5849026 held by Marc Sanitation Pvt. Ltd. The court ordered that the goods and service details in Class 11 be amended to specifically reflect 'Bathroom and Sanitary fittings and accessories,' thereby limiting the scope of the trademark registration. This decision allows the petitioner to achieve a more precise definition of the registered goods, aligning with prior agreements.
trademark plaintiff favorable · Sep 8, 2025

M/S New Bharat Overseas v.M/S Bhagwati Lacto Vegetarian Exports Pvt Ltd

Delhi High Court - Orders · C.O.(COMM.IPD-CR) 843/2022

The Delhi High Court allowed an application for substitution, recognizing that the original petitioner's trademark and copyright rights had been assigned to a new entity, M/s New Bharat Impex. The court held that since the cause of action now rested with the assignee, the substitution was necessary for effective adjudication. This order ensures continuity in IP litigation following a change in ownership.
trademark interim order · Sep 4, 2025

Incyte Holdings Corporation v.Metrochem Api Private Limited

Delhi High Court - Orders · CS(COMM) 943/2025

The Plaintiffs filed a suit seeking permanent injunction against the Defendant for infringing Indian Patent No. 269841, which covers Ruxolitinib compounds used in JAKAVI tablets. The court passed an order granting various exemptions and appointing Local Commissioners to execute the interim injunction.
trademark mixed · Aug 29, 2025

Biswanath Hosiery Mills Ltd v.Micky Metals Ltd And Anr

Calcutta High Court · IPDATM/144/2023, IPDATM/149/2023

In this trademark rectification proceeding before the Calcutta High Court, the court noted that the petitioner's advocate-on-record was absent and no representative could furnish instructions. Due to the wastage of judicial time caused by the non-appearance, the court directed Biswanath Hosiery Mills Ltd to pay costs of Rs. 25,000/- to the respondents. The matter has been adjourned for further hearing.
trademark mixed · Aug 29, 2025

Biswanath Hosiery Mills Ltd v.Micky Metals Ltd And Anr

Calcutta High Court · IPDATM/144/2023, IPDATM/149/2023

In this trademark rectification proceeding before the Calcutta High Court, the court noted that the petitioner's advocate-on-record was absent and no representative could furnish instructions. Due to the wastage of judicial time caused by the non-appearance, the court directed Biswanath Hosiery Mills Ltd to pay costs of Rs. 25,000/- to the respondents. The matter has been adjourned for further hearing.
trademark plaintiff favorable · Aug 22, 2025

Mankind Pharma Limited v.The Registrar Of Trade Marks

Delhi High Court · C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 54/2024

Mankind Pharma Limited appealed the Registrar of Trade Marks' refusal to register its mark PETKIND in Class 5, citing similarity to a prior application 'PETKIND PHARMA'. The Appellant argued that its extensive goodwill and established 'KIND Family of Marks' should prevail. The Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the rejection order.
trademark plaintiff favorable · Aug 21, 2025

Cipla Limited v.Union Of India Through Department Of Promotion Of Industry And Internal Trade & Anr

Delhi High Court - Orders · W.P.(C)-IPD 42/2025

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Cipla Limited, directing the Trademark Registry to allow the renewal of its 'TRIEXER' trademark. The core finding was that the Registry failed to serve the mandatory statutory 'O3 notice' required under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Despite the trademark having lapsed and the petitioner failing to file timely renewals, the court emphasized this procedural lapse by the Respondent, granting Cipla a chance to regularize its mark.
trademark interim order · Aug 21, 2025

Raaj Unocal Lubricants Limited v.Phillips 66 Company And Anr.

Calcutta High Court · IPDATM/225/2023

The Calcutta High Court addressed an application seeking the rectification and cancellation of a trademark dispute between Raaj Unocal Lubricants Limited and Phillips 66 Company. The court issued interim directions, requiring both parties to file their respective Affidavits-in-Opposition within three weeks from the judgment date. This procedural step moves the matter forward in the ongoing intellectual property litigation.
trademark interim order · Aug 20, 2025

Bisleri International Private Limited v.Bisheshwar Mahto

Bombay High Court · 19-IA(L)-21237-2025

The plaintiff, Bisleri International Private Limited, filed an interim application seeking injunctions against the defendant for infringing its trade marks (BISLERI) and copyrights. The court granted ad-interim relief restraining the defendant from using similar marks, artwork, and designs on packaged drinking water products.
trademark pending · Aug 20, 2025

Bisleri International Private Limited v.Priti Rajawat, Sole Proprietor Of M/S ...

Bombay High Court · 13-iaL-30040-24

Bisleri International Private Limited filed an Interim Application seeking further ad-interim relief against Priti Rajawat for alleged infringement of its trademarks (BRISLERI), copyright in its label/packaging, and design/shape. The court noted that previous interim orders were granted but had not been served on the Defendants. Consequently, the court ordered service of the relevant order before hearing and disposing of the current application.
trademark interim order · Aug 20, 2025

Bisleri International Private Limited v.Bisheshwar Mahto

Bombay High Court · 19-IA(L)-21237-2025

The petitioner, Bisleri International Private Limited, sought interim relief against the respondent for infringing its trademarks and copyrights concerning packaged drinking water. The court granted ad-interim injunctions restraining the defendant from using deceptively similar marks and artwork, and also allowed leave to combine the passing off claim with the infringement suit.
trademark settled · Aug 14, 2025

Thilakarasu Venkatasamy trading as Grand Catering Company v.Brand Avatar Llp

Madras High Court · OP(TM)Nos.64 & 65 of 2024

The Madras High Court dismissed Original Petitions OP(TM)Nos.64 & 65 of 2024 after the parties, Thilakarasu Venkatasamy and Brand Avatar LLP, reached an out-of-court settlement. The petitions sought the removal or rectification of specific trademark entries (Registration Nos. 5795826 and 3843193) in Class 41. Given the amicable resolution between the parties, the court allowed the proceedings to be dismissed without further order on costs.
trademark mixed · Aug 11, 2025

Novartis Ag & Anr. v.M/S Steris Healthcare Pvt Ltd & Anr.

Delhi High Court - Orders · C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 187/2025

The Delhi High Court initiated proceedings under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, concerning the removal and rectification of the trademark 'INCLISIRAN' (Registration No. 5547194) in Class 05. The court issued notice to all parties involved, setting a timeline for filing replies and rejoinders. This marks the formal commencement of the legal challenge against the registered mark.
trademark plaintiff favorable · Aug 4, 2025

M/S Prakash Pipes Limited v.Registrar Of Trademarks & Ors.

Delhi High Court - Orders · C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 174/2025, I.A. 18749/2025 & I.A. 18750/2025

The Delhi High Court allowed a Rectification Petition filed by M/S Prakash Pipes Limited against the Registrar of Trademarks. The petition sought the cancellation and removal of the trade mark 'PARKASHPOWER' (Registration No. 4798175) from the register. With no objection from certain respondents, the court directed that the impugned mark be removed, thereby rectifying the trademark registry.
1 234•••43
Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a trademark dispute?

Arctic's TM litigation team handles ~120 trademark matters per year across India, EU, and UK. From oppositions to infringement actions, we build winning arguments from precedent.

Talk to our TM team →