Trademark Cases

3,667 decisions across India

India 3,667

Page 16 of 123

trademark mixed · May 26, 2025

Castrol Limited v.Govind Mohan Sharma

Delhi High Court - Orders · CS(COMM) 313/2024, I.A. 8464/2024-Stay

In a matter concerning trademark recognition, Castrol Limited sought to establish its 'CASTROL' and 'ACTIV' marks as well-known trademarks before the Delhi High Court. The plaintiff presented detailed arguments supporting this claim. While the court did not issue a final ruling on the merits of the well-known status, it granted an adjournment to the defendant for further submissions, indicating that the matter remains active in litigation.
trademark plaintiff favorable · May 26, 2025

M/S Ambika Industrial Corporation v.The Registrar Of Trade Marks & Anr.

Delhi High Court · W.P.(C)-IPD 35/2022

The Delhi High Court quashed an order by the Trade Marks Registry that had allowed a change in the registered address for the 'AMBIKA' trademark. The petitioner firm argued that the change, filed by a former partner (Respondent No. 2), lacked justification and was detrimental to the established proprietor. The court ruled that since the petitioner remains the undisputed registered owner, the registry could not unilaterally alter the address based on an unsupported application, thereby restoring the original details.
trademark plaintiff favorable · May 23, 2025

Devdarshan Dhoop Industries & Anr v.Adhyatmik Technologies Pvt Ltd & Ors

Delhi High Court - Orders · CS(COMM) 1100/2024 (Rev. Pet. 323/2025)

The Delhi High Court allowed the Plaintiffs' review petition, significantly modifying a previous order to strengthen their intellectual property protections. The court clarified that the injunction against the Defendants must cover not only traditional goods but also digital services like virtual worshipping and darshan under the 'DEVDARSHAN' trademark. Furthermore, the judgment reinforced the specific performance of the prior Settlement Agreement and mandated the removal of all related listings.
trademark mixed · May 22, 2025

M/S Mithaas Sweets And Restaurant Private Limited v.M/S Lakhi Ram Deepak Kumar

Delhi High Court - Orders · C.R.P. 385/2024 & CM APPL. 75635-75637/2024

The Delhi High Court addressed a petition filed by Mithaas Sweets and Restaurant challenging the District Judge's order that allowed the Respondent to file a suit afresh regarding trademark infringement. While initial applications concerning delay condonation were granted, the core dispute over jurisdiction—specifically why a 2016 suit was decided by a Civil Court instead of under the Commercial Courts Act—was deferred. The court has now scheduled further proceedings for August 19, 2025, requiring both parties to file detailed notes of contentions.
trademark defendant favorable · May 19, 2025

Vikas Gupta / Neha Herbals Pvt. Ltd. v.Inder Raj Sahni Proprietor M/S Sahni Cosmetics

Delhi High Court · C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 355/2021 & C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 455/2022

The Delhi High Court addressed a complex trademark dispute over the common name 'NEHA' used in the personal care sector. The Plaintiffs, Neha Herbals, claimed infringement and passing off against Sahni Cosmetics, which uses the mark for creams. While the court acknowledged the Defendant's prior use of the mark for creams, it ultimately found that the Plaintiffs had established continuous use and valid registrations for their goods (Mehandi). Consequently, the suit seeking damages was dismissed, but the cancellation petitions filed by the Defendant were also rejected.
trademark plaintiff favorable · May 19, 2025

Dhunseri Petrochem And Tea Ltd. v.Mr. Dhanraj Khatri And Anr.

Calcutta High Court · IPDCR/32/2022

Dhunseri Petrochem And Tea Ltd. filed an application seeking rectification of a copyright registration held by its opponents, alleging that the respondent's artistic work was a deceptive and substantial reproduction of the petitioner's established labels ('Lal Ghora' and 'Kala Ghora'). The petitioner demonstrated long-standing use and exclusive association with their distinctive packaging designs for tea. The court found that the respondent's design was deceptively similar, noting only cosmetic changes while retaining the core features and color scheme. Consequently, the registration of the impugned artistic work was directed to be expunged.
trademark settled · May 16, 2025

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. v.Oziel Pharmaceuticals P. Ltd. & Anr.

Delhi High Court - Orders · CS(COMM) 1041/2024

The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application for a consent decree in the dispute between Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Oziel Pharmaceuticals P. Ltd. The parties reached an amicable settlement regarding trademark infringement concerning 'PEPFIZ' and 'MINOZ'. Key terms include Defendants recognizing Plaintiff's exclusive rights, agreeing to cease use of deceptively similar marks like 'PEPFIX' and 'MINOZIL', and changing the product name from 'MINOZIL' to 'MINODYL'. The court partially decreed the suit based on these binding settlement terms.
trademark plaintiff favorable · May 16, 2025

Enhaz Beverages Private Limited v.Shubh Food Agro Industries & Ors.

Delhi High Court - Orders · CS(COMM) 489/2025

The Delhi High Court granted an ex parte ad interim injunction in favor of Enhaz Beverages Private Limited against Shubh Food Agro Industries & Ors. The court found that the defendant's use of the mark 'GROWSY' and a deceptively similar trade dress constituted infringement, passing off, and dilution of the plaintiff's registered trademark 'GROOVY' and its family of marks. This preliminary order protects the plaintiff's brand reputation while the full suit proceeds.
trademark mixed · May 15, 2025

Jk Lakshmi Cement Limited v.Ram Kumar & Anr.

Delhi High Court - Orders · C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 117/2025

The Delhi High Court issued a significant order in the dispute between Jk Lakshmi Cement Limited and Ram Kumar & Anr., addressing both rectification and interim stay applications. The court granted an interim stay on the registration of trademark No. 5849311, recognizing the petitioner's prior rights concerning similar packaging and marks (JK/JKLC). Furthermore, the court directed the initiation of formal proceedings for the rectification of the impugned mark in Class 19, setting clear timelines for notice and response from all parties.
trademark mixed · May 15, 2025

Ayka Tech And Systems Pvt Ltd v.Yash Tiwari & Anr.

Delhi High Court - Orders · CS(COMM) 387/2023

The Delhi High Court framed key issues in the trademark infringement suit filed by Ayka Tech And Systems Pvt Ltd against Yash Tiwari & Anr. The core dispute revolves around whether the defendants breached an MoU and infringed upon the 'Salestown' trademark used for a CRM software. Crucially, the court clarified that while injunctions are sought regarding 'Salestown,' the defendants remain free to use any other CRM software in their business.
trademark plaintiff favorable · May 15, 2025

Raj Kumar Proprietor Of Ms Royal Pets Cart v.Pooja Ahirwar Proprietor Of Ms Aselfy Enterprises

Delhi High Court - Orders · CS(COMM) 954/2024

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction in favor of the plaintiff, Raj Kumar Proprietor Of Ms Royal Pets Cart, against Pooja Ahirwar Proprietor Of Ms Aselfy Enterprises. The court found that the defendant's pending trademark application for 'ROYAL PETS CART/' was deceptively similar to the plaintiff's established mark and constituted a prima facie case of infringement. Consequently, the defendant was restrained from using the impugned mark in relation to identical goods until the final hearing.
trademark plaintiff favorable · May 15, 2025

Signatureglobal (India) Limited v.Ashok Kumar And Ors.

Delhi High Court - Orders · CS(COMM) 482/2025

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction in favor of Signatureglobal (India) Limited, a leading real estate developer. The court found that the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case regarding trademark infringement and passing off by various online entities imitating its brand 'SIGNATUREGLOBAL'. Consequently, the defendants were directed to immediately take down or block all infringing websites and were restrained from registering similar domains, protecting the company's digital presence and consumer trust.
trademark mixed · May 15, 2025

Microtex Energy Private Limited v.Microtek International Private Limited and Anr.

Delhi High Court - Orders · C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 116/2025

The Delhi High Court initiated proceedings in C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 116/2025, where the petitioner sought the cancellation of the trademark 'MICROTEK TECHNOLOGY WE LIVE' (No. 3482800). The court issued notice to all respondents and set a timeline for filing replies and rejoinders. Several ancillary applications regarding document submission and procedural matters were also disposed of by the court.
trademark mixed · May 14, 2025

Jindal Steel And Power Limited v.Jp Structures Private Limited

Madhya Pradesh High Court · MP No. 2297 of 2025

In this ongoing trademark infringement dispute, Jindal Steel And Power Limited challenged the trial court's decision to delete Defendant No. 1 (Jp Structures Private Limited) from the case. The petitioner argued that Defendant No. 1 was a necessary party because they were the original user of the infringing goods and disclosed the names of subsequent suppliers. The High Court directed notice be issued, ensuring the matter would be heard on July 3rd, allowing the dispute over party status to continue.
trademark mixed · May 14, 2025

M/S Green Star Pharma Llp v.Ved Prakash Trading As Green Star Pharma

Delhi High Court - Orders · FAO (COMM) 121/2025

This Delhi High Court order addresses an appeal filed by M/S Green Star Pharma Llp against the Commercial Court's dismissal of its interim injunction application. The core dispute revolves around the use of the 'GREEN STAR' trademark in the pharmaceutical sector. While the appellant relies on passing off, the court raises significant questions regarding the timing and scope of goodwill acquisition, especially given the respondent's earlier registered device mark.
trademark mixed · May 14, 2025

Mankind Pharma Limited v.Zhejiang Yige Enterprise Management Group Co Ltd

Delhi High Court · C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 2/2024

Mankind Pharma Limited appealed a decision by the Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks regarding an opposition filed against the trademark 'FLORASIS'. The Delhi High Court granted condonation of a 7-day delay in filing the appeal, allowing the matter to proceed. Notice has been issued to all parties, setting the stage for a substantive hearing on the merits of the trademark dispute.
trademark defendant favorable · May 14, 2025

Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd v.Indorbit Pharmaceuticals P. Ltd. & Anr.

Delhi High Court · CS(COMM) 912/2024, I.A. 42669/2024-Stay

The Delhi High Court rejected Torrent Pharmaceuticals' oral request to pass a permanent injunction and decree against Indorbit Pharmaceuticals based on passing off and copyright infringement. Although the defendants failed to file written statements, the court found that the plaintiff had not sufficiently established its prior adoption and usage of the new trade dress (SHELCAL-500) since September 2022. The judgment emphasizes that while a party's failure to respond can lead to a default decree, the threshold for such an order is high, especially in complex IP matters like pharmaceutical products, necessitating full evidence and trial.
trademark mixed · May 14, 2025

M/S Aggarwal Trading Company v.The Registrar Of Trade Marks

Delhi High Court - Orders · W.P.(C)-IPD 35/2025

M/S Aggarwal Trading Company approached the Delhi High Court seeking rectification of their trademark register entries (Registration Nos. 671443 and 671598). The petitioner argued that despite the marks being valid up to specific future dates, the online system incorrectly displayed messages indicating renewal failure due to delays. The court took cognizance of this discrepancy and issued notice to the Registrar of Trade Marks, directing them to provide clarifications regarding the validity and renewal status of both trademarks.
trademark mixed · May 14, 2025

M/S. F.K. Bearing Group Co. Ltd. v.Vinod Kumar & Anr.

Delhi High Court - Orders · C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 87/2023, I.A. 3575/2023

In a trademark dispute concerning bearing group products, the Delhi High Court issued an order on May 14, 2025. The court noted that negotiation talks between M/S. F.K. Bearing Group Co. Ltd. and the respondents were still ongoing. Consequently, the court decided to renotify the parties for further proceedings on August 7, 2025, indicating a continued focus on out-of-court resolution.
trademark plaintiff favorable · May 14, 2025

Ms C R Auluck And Sons Private Limited v.Ms Dharamlaxmi Machines Private Limited & Anr.

Delhi High Court - Orders · C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 243/2024

The Delhi High Court granted a stay on the registered trademark 'DHARMLAXMI' belonging to the respondent, in favor of the petitioner who owns 'LUXMI'. The court found prima facie evidence suggesting deceptive similarity between the two marks and products (sewing machines), noting that the respondent was using the mark in a manner different from its registration. This interim order is crucial for the petitioner as it prevents the respondent from continuing to operate under the disputed trademark while the rectification petition proceeds.
trademark mixed · May 14, 2025

Himalaya Global Holdings Ltd v.Jeena Sikho Lifecare Limited

Delhi High Court - Orders · CS(COMM) 469/2025

The Delhi High Court issued a significant order in the trademark infringement suit filed by Himalaya Global Holdings Ltd against Jeena Sikho Lifecare Limited. The court permitted the plaintiffs to file additional documentation and, crucially, addressed the request for an ad interim injunction. While noting concerns over mark similarity and color combination usage, the court granted conditional relief, requiring the defendant (D-1) to change its packaging colors within two weeks while allowing it to exhaust existing stock.
trademark mixed · May 13, 2025

Alkem Laboratories Ltd. v.M/S Martin And Brown Biosciences & Ors.

Delhi High Court - Orders · C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 114/2025

Alkem Laboratories Ltd. filed a Rectification Petition against M/S Martin And Brown Biosciences & Ors., seeking the removal or cancellation of the trademark registration 'SOMI-MB' (No. 5982177) in Class 5, arguing that it is confusingly similar to their existing mark 'SUMO'. The Delhi High Court issued notice to the respondents and set timelines for filing written synopses and replies, indicating that the matter will proceed through formal litigation.
trademark mixed · May 13, 2025

94 Cedar Properties And Trading Llp & Ors v.Shri Munish Thakur & Anr

Delhi High Court - Orders · CONT.CAS(C) 753/2025 & CONT.CAS(C) 754/2025

The Delhi High Court addressed petitions alleging wilful disobedience of undertakings related to a previous settlement concerning the trademark 'DROTIN' and its variants. The petitioner alleged that the respondent was using the deceptively similar mark 'DROTINXT' in medicinal preparations, constituting contempt of court. Consequently, the Court issued notice to the respondents, setting a date for their returnable appearance.
trademark mixed · May 13, 2025

Glossy Paints India Pvt Ltd & Anr. v.Nippon Paint (India) Private Limited & Ors.

Delhi High Court - Orders · CS(COMM) 302/2025

The Delhi High Court has formally registered the trademark infringement suit filed by Glossy Paints India Pvt Ltd against Nippon Paint. While addressing various interlocutory applications, the court allowed the plaintiffs to file additional documents and exempted them from pre-institution mediation. Crucially, the court also initiated proceedings for an interim injunction, setting a date for further arguments on the matter of trademark infringement.
trademark plaintiff favorable · May 9, 2025

Hero Investcorp Pvt Ltd And Anr v.Ashok Kumar (John Doe)

Delhi High Court - Orders · CS(COMM) 1235/2025 & I.As. 28626-30/2025

The Delhi High Court granted interim relief to Hero Investcorp Pvt Ltd in its suit against an unidentified entity manufacturing and selling counterfeit two-wheeler spare parts. The court recognized the Plaintiffs' registered trademarks and trade dress associated with 'HERO GENUINE PRODUCTS.' Crucially, the court appointed a Local Commissioner to execute a search and seizure commission at the Defendant's premises to recover infringing goods, setting the stage for further litigation.
trademark mixed · May 9, 2025

Hell Energy Magyarorszag Kft v.Sipsnap Soda Llp & Ors

Delhi High Court - Orders · CS(COMM) 452/2025

The Delhi High Court issued a comprehensive order in the trademark infringement suit filed by Hell Energy against Sipsnap Soda. The court allowed several procedural applications, including granting exemptions from mandatory pre-litigation mediation and advanced service upon the defendants. Crucially, the court permitted the plaintiff to appoint a Local Commissioner to conduct search and seizure of evidence at the defendant's premises, ensuring the preservation of potential infringing materials. This order moves the case forward by formalizing the suit for permanent injunction regarding the 'HELL ENERGY' trademark and trade dress.
trademark plaintiff favorable · May 9, 2025

Moti Mahal Delux Management Services Pvt Ltd & Ors. v.M/S Universal Corporation & Anr.

Delhi High Court - Orders · CS(COMM) 451/2025

The Delhi High Court granted an ad-interim injunction in favor of Moti Mahal Delux Management Services against Universal Corporation. The court found that the plaintiffs had established a prima facie case regarding trademark infringement and passing off, noting the long history and exponential growth of the 'Moti Mahal' brand since 1920. Given the risk of irreparable harm to the plaintiff's goodwill, the defendant was immediately restrained from using identical or deceptively similar marks like 'MOTI MAHAL DELUX TANDOORI TRAIL'.
trademark mixed · May 8, 2025

Ms Cafe Brown Sugar Pvt Ltd v.Vyom Foodcraft Pvt Ltd & Anr.

Delhi High Court - Orders · CS(COMM) 1008/2024, I.A. 44967/2024-Stay

The Delhi High Court addressed an application seeking to introduce additional documents related to trademark applications and assignments in a commercial suit. The court, emphasizing that procedure is the handmaid of justice, permitted the plaintiff to place statutory Trademark Registry documents on record, despite their belated submission. However, the court rejected a third-party legal notice as irrelevant to the pleadings. This order allows the litigation to proceed with expanded evidence while ensuring procedural fairness for both parties.
trademark mixed · May 8, 2025

Ms Khatema Fibres Limited v.Dr Rakesh Chandra Rastogi & Ors.

Delhi High Court - Orders · CS(COMM) 910/2024

The Delhi High Court issued an order allowing Ms Khatema Fibres Limited to proceed with a rectification petition against the registered trademark 'KHATEMA' held by Defendant No. 1. The court formally initiated the proceedings, granting both parties specific timeframes—four weeks for the defendant's reply and six weeks for filing composite written synopses in related applications. This order sets the stage for a detailed legal battle over the validity of the trademark registration.
trademark mixed · May 8, 2025

Abbott Product Operations Ag & Anr. v.Medinox Pharmaceuticals & Ors.

Delhi High Court - Orders · CS(COMM) 426/2025

In a significant development concerning trademark infringement, the Delhi High Court issued an order compelling Defendants No. 1 and 2 (pharmaceutical distributors) to immediately cease manufacturing medicines bearing the impugned trademark 'DUPHAMED' or any variation using 'DUPHA'. This interim relief was granted in the context of urgent proceedings, while also allowing time for existing stock disposal. The court further streamlined procedural requirements by granting exemptions related to document filing and pre-institution mediation.
1 •••151617•••123
Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a trademark dispute?

Arctic's TM litigation team handles ~120 trademark matters per year across India, EU, and UK. From oppositions to infringement actions, we build winning arguments from precedent.

Talk to our TM team →