Patent Cases

12,714 decisions across India · European UPC · US PTAB

India 4,909 European UPC 2,185 US PTAB 5,620

Page 26 of 424

patent LITIGATION · May 4, 2026

Simmons & Simmons LLP v.Genentech Inc., F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Organon Heist B.V., and NV Organon

Brussels - Local Division · UPC_ADC6CCA645

This order concerns an application by Simmons & Simmons LLP under Rule 262.1(b) RoP for access to written pleadings and evidence from two underlying UPC proceedings (UPC_CFI_407/2025 and UPC_CFI_408/2025) involving Genentech/Roche as claimants and Organon as defendants, which were orders to preserve evidence and for inspection concerning EP 3 401 335 B1 that were subsequently withdrawn. The Judge-Rapporteur held that while Article 45 UPCA permits confidentiality in the interest of justice, access should be granted to redacted submissions leading to the orders and review decisions, but not to information subject to an EEO-regime for which destruction/return requests were pending when the actions were withdrawn.
patent LITIGATION · May 4, 2026

Miele & Cie. KG v.Melitta Europa GmbH & Co. KG

Munich (DE) Local Division · UPC-CFI-1148/2026 UPC-CFI-1148/2026 Full Details

Application for provisional measures
patent LITIGATION · May 4, 2026

Gilead Sciences, Inc. v.Academy of Military Medical Sciences

Milan (IT) Central Division- Section · UPC_CFI_552/2025 UPC_CFI_552/2025 Full Details

Revocation Action
patent LITIGATION · May 4, 2026

Simmons & Simmons LLP GENENTECH INC. F. HOFFMANN – LA ROCHE AG v.ORGANON HEIST B.V. NV ORGANON

Brussels (BE) Local Division · UPC-CFI-1167/2026 UPC-CFI-1167/2026 Full Details

Access To Case
patent LITIGATION · May 4, 2026

Topsoe A/S v.SYPOX GmbH a. o.

Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division · UPC_CFI_1696/2025 UPC_CFI_1696/2025 Full Details

Generic Order
patent LITIGATION · May 4, 2026

OTEC Präzisionsfinish GmbH v.STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE S.L.

Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division · UPC_CFI_885/2025 UPC_CFI_885/2025 Full Details

Generic Order
patent LITIGATION · May 4, 2026

AdvanSix Resins & Chemicals LLC. v.Krahn Chemie Benelux BV

The Hague (NL) Local Division · UPC_CFI_2028/2025 UPC_CFI_2028/2025 Full Details

Application for preserving evidence pursuant to RoP192
patent LITIGATION · May 4, 2026

Dyson Technology Limited v.DREAME INTERNATIONAL (HONGKONG) LIMITED a. o.

Hamburg (DE) Local Division · UPC_CFI_851/2025 UPC_CFI_851/2025 Full Details

Infringement Action
patent LITIGATION · May 4, 2026

Dolby International AB v.CPYou B.V. / Acer et al.

The Hague (NL) Local Division · UPC_1E9313120C

This procedural order concerns the rectification of an obvious error in a prior order dated 1 May 2026. The parties agreed that the Defendants' application under R. 190 erroneously referred to 'Acer' where 'Vectis' (the Intervener) was intended, as evidenced by the use of 'Dolby and/or Vectis' elsewhere in the application. The Court, applying R. 353 RoP, rectified the error by replacing 'Dolby and Acer' with 'Dolby and Vectis' on pages 3 and 7 of the earlier order.
patent LITIGATION · May 4, 2026

Miele & Cie. KG v.Melitta Europa GmbH & Co. KG

Munich (DE) Local Division · UPC_61B6363628

Miele filed an application for provisional measures against Melitta before the Local Chamber Munich of the Unified Patent Court, alleging infringement of EP 4 676 295 B1 through Melitta's 'SWIRL M60' vacuum cleaner filter bags. After the court indicated that the patent's validity appeared compromised by prior art (DE 3403121 A1), Miele withdrew its application. The court allowed the withdrawal, ordered Miele to reimburse Melitta's costs, but granted Miele a 50% refund of court fees (€7,300) beca
patent LITIGATION · May 4, 2026

Simmons & Simmons LLP GENENTECH INC. F. HOFFMANN – LA ROCHE AG v.ORGANON HEIST B.V. NV ORGANON

Brussels (BE) Local Division · UPC_46FFEC8858

In this legal proceeding before Brussels (BE) Local Division (decision issued on 2026-05-04) under reference UPC_46FFEC8858, Simmons & Simmons LLP GENENTECH INC. F. HOFFMANN – LA ROCHE AG appeared in dispute with ORGANON HEIST B.V. NV ORGANON concerning patent rights and legal remedies.
patent LITIGATION · May 4, 2026

Topsoe A/S v.SYPOX GmbH a. o.

Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division · UPC_05FBA5C66C

This case concerns European Patent EP 3 802 413 B1, held by Topsoe A/S, in proceedings involving inspection and preservation of evidence against SYPOX GmbH and Josef Kerner Energiewirtschafts-GmbH. The applicant challenged the impartiality of an appointed expert, seeking to have the expert disqualified on grounds of bias. The Local Chamber Düsseldorf examined whether circumstances existed that would give a knowledgeable and reasonable observer justified doubts about the expert's impartiality or independence. The court ruled that the content of an expert report alone is insufficient to cast doubt on impartiality, and that a flawed report or lack of expertise does not indicate bias unless additional circumstances suggest a lack of objectivity.
patent LITIGATION · May 4, 2026

OTEC Präzisionsfinish GmbH v.STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE S.L.

Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division · UPC_D6B3DDF3C4

This case concerns European Patent EP 2 983 864 B1 and involves an application by OTEC Präzisionsfinish GmbH for the revocation of an inspection and evidence preservation order previously issued ex parte by the Local Chamber Düsseldorf on September 22, 2025. The original order had permitted OTEC to inspect a 'DLyte PRO500 Automated Cell' at the respondent's stand at the EMO Messe Hannover 2025 trade fair, including operating the device, attaching a smartphone to measure rotation speed, and configuring programs. The present order, issued on May 4, 2026, addresses the respondent's request to set aside that earlier inspection order under Article 60(8) of the relevant agreement and Rules 198.1 and 199.2 of the Rules of Procedure.
patent LITIGATION · May 4, 2026

AdvanSix Resins & Chemicals LLC. v.Krahn Chemie Benelux BV

The Hague (NL) Local Division · UPC_92288DC5FC

AdvanSix Resins & Chemicals LLC obtained an ex parte preservation of evidence and inspection order against Krahn Chemie Benelux BV and two Italian defendants, alleging indirect infringement of EP3286270 relating to an anti-skinning composition containing at least 98 wt% of 2-pentanone oxime. Krahn filed a review of the ex parte order under R.197.3 RoP, seeking revocation of the order, return of seized evidence, and provision of security. The Court dismissed Krahn's requests to revoke the order,
patent LITIGATION · May 4, 2026

Dyson Technology Limited v.DREAME INTERNATIONAL (HONGKONG) LIMITED a. o.

Hamburg (DE) Local Division · UPC_7111BA183A

This procedural order concerns an infringement action brought by Dyson Technology Limited against six defendants associated with the Dreame group, regarding European Patent EP3119235. The defendants filed a Statement of Defense requesting a stay of proceedings on two grounds: first, a referral to the Court of Justice of the European Union regarding the interpretation of Article 8 no. 1 of the Brussels Regulation, particularly whether an EU representative can serve as an anchor defendant for a non-EU entity; and second, an alternative request to stay proceedings pending the outcome of opposition proceedings before the European Patent Office, which the defendants expect to be resolved within approximately seven months.
patent plaintiff favorable · May 4, 2026

Select Citywalk Retail Private Limited v.Gold Coast Developers Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi High Court - Orders · 182748810

The Delhi High Court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favor of Select Citywalk Retail Private Limited against Gold Coast Developers Pvt. Ltd. for using a deceptively similar trademark. The plaintiff claimed that the trademark 'CITYWALK' is a unique mark adopted by them in 2004 and has become an industry standard for shopping malls and commercial spaces in India. The court allowed the plaintiff's application for exemption from filing original documents and advance service to the defendants.
patent plaintiff favorable · May 4, 2026

Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha v.Tech Square Engineering Pvt Ltd & Anr

Delhi High Court · 163516424

The Delhi High Court allowed Toyota's appeal, directing the removal of Tech Square Engineering's registration for the mark ALPHARD. The court found that Toyota had established prior adoption and spill-over reputation of the mark in India. The respondent's adoption of the mark was found to lack bona fides. The court ordered the rectification of the Register of Trade Marks to reflect the removal of the impugned mark.
patent · May 3, 2026

Google LLC et al. v.SoftView LLC

· IPR2026-00282

Google has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate claims 1‑22 of SoftView’s ’729 patent, alleging they are obvious over prior‑art handheld browsers (Zaurus, Pad++) and SVG standards, with claim 21 also relying on SVF. The petition invokes estoppel and issue preclusion based on earlier PTAB findings for related patents.
patent · May 3, 2026

Google LLC et al. v.SoftView LLC

· IPR2026-00281

Google has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of claims 1‑35 of SoftView’s ’154 patent, asserting obviousness over Zaurus, Pad++, SVG and SVF prior art and arguing that the claims are patentably indistinct from already invalidated claims in related patents.
patent · May 3, 2026

Google LLC et al. v.SoftView LLC

· IPR2026-00283

Google has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate claims 1‑37 of SoftView’s ’628 patent, asserting obviousness over Zaurus, Pad++, and SVG references and arguing the claims are indistinct from already invalidated claims in related patents.
patent · May 3, 2026

Google LLC et al. v.SoftView LLC

· IPR2026-00284

Google has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate all 115 claims of SoftView’s ’889 patent, asserting that the claims are obvious over Zaurus, Pad++, and SVG references and are indistinct from previously cancelled claims in related patents.
patent LITIGATION · May 1, 2026

Dolby International AB v.CPYou B.V. / Acer et al.

The Hague (NL) Local Division · UPC-CFI-0001536/2025 UPC-CFI-0001536/2025 Full Details

Infringement Action
patent LITIGATION · May 1, 2026

Dolby International AB v.CPYou B.V. / Acer et al.

The Hague (NL) Local Division · UPC-CFI-0001536/2025 UPC-CFI-0001536/2025 Full Details

Infringement Action
patent LITIGATION · May 1, 2026

Dolby International AB v.CPYou B.V. / Acer et al.

The Hague (NL) Local Division · UPC_CA52B3750E

This procedural order from the Local Division The Hague addresses multiple procedural applications in an infringement action brought by Dolby International AB against CPYou B.V. and several Acer entities concerning European Patent EP3079153. The order deals with Acer's application for production of comparable licence agreements under Rule 190, requests for a confidentiality regime under Rules 262A and 262.2, the intervention of Vectis IP Ltd., and Dolbys request for an extension of deadlines. The subject matter includes an infringement action, a counterclaim for revocation, and a counterclaim for rate-setting.
patent terminated or settled · May 1, 2026

Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al. v.Fractus, S.A.

· IPR2026-00196

Verizon Wireless and Fractus have settled the IPR concerning U.S. Patent 11,031,677, filing a joint motion to terminate the proceeding. The Board is asked to end the review under statutory authority.
patent · May 1, 2026

Paragon 28, Inc. v.TREACE MEDICAL CONCEPTS, INC.

· IPR2026-00194

Treace Medical announced a confidential settlement with Fusion Orthopedics, ending a lawsuit over its Lapiplasty bunion correction system. The agreement resolves multiple infringement and unfair competition claims.
patent terminated or settled · May 1, 2026

Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al. v.Fractus, S.A.

· IPR2026-00196

Verizon Wireless and Fractus settled their IPR dispute before the trial began. The Board granted the joint motion to terminate, dismissing the petition.
patent terminated or settled · May 1, 2026

Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al. v.Fractus, S.A.

· IPR2026-00196

A confidential settlement agreement was filed, leading to a joint motion to terminate the IPR.
patent · May 1, 2026

Paragon 28, Inc. v.TREACE MEDICAL CONCEPTS, INC.

· IPR2026-00194

Paragon 28, Inc. has filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 30 claims of Treace Medical’s bunion‑correction patent, arguing that the claims are obvious over multiple prior‑art references.
patent · May 1, 2026

Amazon.com Services LLC et al. v.InterDigital VC Holdings, Inc. et al.

· IPR2026-00192

Amazon has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate 17 claims of InterDigital’s ’606 video‑encoding patent, asserting obviousness over Sekiguchi, VCEG‑AJ21, Xiong and H.264. The petition details extensive claim‑by‑claim analysis linking each limitation to the prior art.
1 •••252627•••424
Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Dealing with a patent challenge?

Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.

Talk to our patent team →