Patent Cases

12,714 decisions across India · European UPC · US PTAB

India 4,909 European UPC 2,185 US PTAB 5,620

Page 201 of 424

patent plaintiff favorable · Oct 24, 2024

Promoshirt Sm. Pvt. Ltd. v.The Registrar Of Trade Marks

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Promoshirt Sm. Pvt. Ltd., directing the Registrar of Trade Marks to restore and renew a trademark registration (No. 1150198). The petitioner argued that the delay in issuing the certificate, coupled with failure to serve mandatory renewal notices (O-3 Notice), prevented them from renewing their mark despite its initial validity period expiring. Citing precedent, the Court held that the proprietor should not be penalized for administrative lapses by the Registry, mandating the restoration and subsequent renewal of the trademark.

patent settled · Oct 24, 2024

V.P. Nandakumar and Manappuram Finance Limited v.Jayashree

Madras High Court · 142010308

In a dispute over the 'MANAPURAM' trademark, V.P. Nandakumar and Manappuram Finance Limited successfully reached a settlement with Jayashree before the Madras High Court. The parties agreed that the Petitioner has prior rights to the mark and that the Respondent will cancel her existing registration (No. 5109630) and transfer associated domain names within ten days. This compromise resolves the petition seeking removal of the infringing trademark entry.

patent plaintiff favorable · Oct 23, 2024

Mr.Rahul Bagga v.The Controller of Patent

Madras High Court · 195609216

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to quash an abandonment order related to his patent application (No. 202041009246). The petitioner argued that he was unable to upload the response to the First Examination Report on the deadline due to technical/server errors on the respondent's website. The court found merit in this claim and ordered the abandonment quashed, directing the respondent to accept the response.

patent · Oct 22, 2024

10x Genomics, Inc., President and Fellows of Harvard College, v.Vizgen, Inc.

Hamburg (DE) Local Division · UPC-001688

This is an order from the Local Division Hamburg concerning a patent infringement action involving European Patent EP4108782 held by President and Fellows of Harvard College. The defendant Vizgen, Inc. filed a request under Rule 333.1 of the Rules of Procedure seeking review by the full panel of the reporting judge's order of August 15, 2024, which had rejected Vizgen's requests for production of documents. The disputed documents relate to non-technical objections, specifically allegations of abuse of rights (Rechtsmissbrauch), and were originally produced in US parallel proceedings.

patent · Oct 22, 2024

Dehns v.Respondent

Munich (DE) Central Division - Section · UPC-001193

Order of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court Central Division (Section Munich) issued on 22 October 2024 APPLICANT Dehns, St Bride´s House, 10 Salisbury Square - EC47 8JD - London – GB, represented by: John Somerton, St Bride's House, 10 Salisbury Square - EC4Y 8

patent terminated or settled · Oct 22, 2024

Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy

· IPR2024-01505

Amazon and Nokia have settled their dispute over a Nokia wireless‑technology patent and jointly moved to terminate the IPR, requesting that the settlement be kept confidential.

patent terminated or settled · Oct 22, 2024

Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy

· IPR2024-01505

Amazon and Nokia settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 9,571,833 and jointly moved to terminate the inter partes review.

patent terminated or settled · Oct 22, 2024

Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy

· IPR2024-01505

Amazon and Nokia filed a joint motion to terminate the IPR on patent 9,571,833 after instituting the review. The Board granted the termination and partially approved confidentiality of the settlement documents.

patent · Oct 22, 2024

MediaTek, Inc. et al. v.Redstone Logics LLC

· IPR2025-00085

MediaTek has filed an IPR petition seeking to invalidate 12 claims of Redstone Logics’ ’339 patent covering multi‑core processor voltage and clock management, arguing obviousness over several prior‑art references and urging the Board to institute the review.

patent · Oct 22, 2024

Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy

· IPR2024-01505

Amazon has filed an IPR petition challenging Nokia’s 9,571,833 patent on HEVC motion‑vector prediction, arguing obviousness over Rusert/Zheng and Nakamura/WD4 and disputing the examiner’s allowance.

patent · Oct 22, 2024

Innoscience America, Inc. et al. v.Infineon Technologies Americas Corp.

· IPR2025-00010

Innoscience America petitions the PTAB to institute an IPR against Infineon's 9,070,755 transistor patent, seeking cancellation of all 14 claims on the basis of anticipation and obviousness over Fujishima and related prior art. The petition argues that discretionary denial is improper and requests the Board find the claims unpatentable.

patent denied · Oct 22, 2024

MediaTek, Inc. et al. v.Redstone Logics LLC

· IPR2025-00085

The PTAB denied institution for an IPR challenge against Redstone Logics LLC's patent, finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on obviousness grounds. The dispute centered on multi-core processor design and clock ratio controllers.

patent denied · Oct 22, 2024

Innoscience America, Inc. et al. v.Infineon Technologies Americas Corp.

· IPR2025-00010

The PTAB denied Innoscience America's petition to institute IPR against Infineon Technologies regarding patent 9070755. The Board found that factors favoring discretionary denial, such as overlap with a parallel ITC investigation, outweighed arguments for institution.

patent instituted · Oct 22, 2024

Amazon.com, Inc. et al. v.Nokia Technologies Oy

· IPR2024-01505

Amazon successfully secured institution at the PTAB against Nokia's video encoding patent (9571833). The Board found a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on multiple obviousness grounds, particularly those combining Rusert and Zheng.

patent plaintiff favorable · Oct 22, 2024

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc v.Controller of Patents and Designs, Government of India

Madras High Court · 45247120

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals appealed a rejection order by the Controller of Patents and Designs. The rejection was based on two grounds: that the amendment sought changed the scope of invention (violating Section 59), and that the subject matter lacked substantial benefit to mankind (Section 3(b)).

patent · Oct 21, 2024

SharkNinja Germany GmbH, SharkNinja Europe Limited v.Respondent

Luxembourg (LU) · UPC-001196

This is an order from the Court of Appeal concerning an application by SharkNinja to admit new evidence (FBD 29) consisting of two annexes to a brief filed by Dyson's representative in a parallel US proceeding. SharkNinja argued the evidence was relevant to the appeal because it contained Dyson's interpretation of the patent feature regarding an elongate handle, which could undermine Dyson's contradictory denial of disclosure of the 'Power Source' feature in the present proceedings. Dyson opposed the application, arguing the evidence was not decisive and that the submission was culpably delayed.

patent · Oct 21, 2024

Nokia of America Corporation et al. v.Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC

· IPR2025-00036

Nokia, Ericsson, AT&T and other carriers have filed a Request for Director Review after the PTAB denied institution of their IPR challenging a Korean-owned telecom patent. They argue the Board abused discretion by ignoring a Sotera stipulation and misapplying Fintiv factors.

patent · Oct 21, 2024

Nokia of America Corporation et al. v.Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC

· IPR2025-00036

Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC defends the Board’s denial of institution in IPR2025‑00036, arguing petitioners introduced new arguments and that the Board’s discretionary analysis under §314(a) was proper. The request for Director Review is contested and remains pending.

patent denied · Oct 21, 2024

Nokia of America Corporation et al. v.Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC

· IPR2025-00036

The USPTO denied the petitioners’ request for Director Review of the institution denial in IPR2025-00036, leaving the original denial in place.

patent · Oct 21, 2024

Nokia of America Corporation et al. v.Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC

· IPR2025-00036

Nokia, Ericsson, AT&T, Verizon and T‑Mobile have filed an IPR petition seeking cancellation of all 18 claims of Pegasus’s 5G slice‑aware handover patent, arguing obviousness over multiple 3GPP standards and that the prior art was not raised during prosecution.

patent denied · Oct 21, 2024

Nokia of America Corporation et al. v.Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC

· IPR2025-00036

The PTAB denied institution of the IPR because the efficiency of ongoing parallel district court litigation outweighed the merits of the patent claims. The denial was based on the discretionary Fintiv factors, despite strong arguments from the petitioner regarding the lack of prior consideration for the grounds.

patent · Oct 20, 2024

Sling TV L.L.C., DISH Technologies L.L.C. v.Respondent

Mannheim (DE) Local Division · UPC-001199

This is a procedural order from the Local Chamber Mannheim concerning European Patent EP 2 479 680. The claimants, DISH Technologies L.L.C. and Sling TV L.L.C., sought an order under Rule 190 of the Rules of Procedure for the production of source code of media players used under Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge, and Safari browsers by certain defendants operating streaming services. The underlying main proceedings concern alleged indirect patent infringement in multiple European countries, with the defendants having filed counterclaims for invalidity.

patent · Oct 20, 2024

Sling TV L.L.C., DISH Technologies L.L.C. v.Respondent

Mannheim (DE) Local Division · UPC-001198

This order concerns an application by DISH Technologies L.L.C. and Sling TV L.L.C. under Rule 191 of the Rules of Procedure seeking an information order against several AYLO entities and related companies regarding the encoding and coding scheme of video files available through their streaming services. The underlying main proceedings involve alleged indirect patent infringement of European Patent EP 2 479 680 in multiple European countries, with the defendants having filed counterclaims for invalidity. The rapporteur judge Böttger issued the order in the Local Chamber Mannheim.

patent · Oct 20, 2024

Sling TV L.L.C., DISH Technologies L.L.C. v.Respondent

Mannheim (DE) Local Division · UPC-001197

The plaintiffs, DISH Technologies L.L.C. and Sling TV L.L.C., sought an order under Rule 191 of the Rules of Procedure requiring defendants AYLO Premium Ltd, AYLO Freesites Ltd, Brockwell Group LLC, and Bridgemaze Group LLC to disclose information about which Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) they use or have used since August 28, 2019 for delivering video files through their streaming services, the locations of CDN servers, and how the video files are encoded and split. The underlying main proceedings concern alleged indirect patent infringement of European Patent EP 2 479 680 in multiple European territories, with defendants having filed counterclaims for invalidity. The order was issued by the reporting judge Böttger of the Local Chamber Mannheim.

patent · Oct 18, 2024

Zepp Health Corporation v.Slyde Analytics, LLC

· IPR2025-00062

Zepp Health and Slyde Analytics filed a joint motion asking the PTB to keep their settlement materials confidential under statutory provisions, separating them from the public patent file.

patent terminated or settled · Oct 18, 2024

Motorola Mobility LLC et al. v.Multifold International Incorporated Pte. Ltd.

· IPR2025-00041

Google and Motorola settled their IPR against Multifold’s patent 9,058,153, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding and keep the settlement terms confidential.

patent terminated or settled · Oct 18, 2024

Zepp Health Corporation v.Slyde Analytics, LLC

· IPR2025-00062

Zepp Health and Slyde Analytics jointly filed a settlement and motion to terminate IPR2025-00062. The PTAB granted the motion, ending the proceeding before any institution decision and keeping the settlement documents confidential.

patent · Oct 18, 2024

Nokia of America Corp. et al. v.Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC

· IPR2025-00037

Nokia, Ericsson, AT&T, Verizon and T‑Mobile have filed a Request for Director Review after the PTAB denied institution of an IPR targeting a Korean‑owned LTE patent. They argue the Board misapplied discretionary standards, ignored a Sotera stipulation, and failed to consider domestic economic impacts.

patent · Oct 18, 2024

Motorola Mobility LLC et al. v.Multifold International Incorporated Pte. Ltd.

· IPR2025-00041

Motorola Mobility, Google, and Multifold International have jointly filed a request to keep their settlement covenants confidential under 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). The request seeks to keep the settlement documents out of the public patent file.

patent terminated or settled · Oct 18, 2024

Zepp Health Corporation v.Slyde Analytics, LLC

· IPR2025-00062

Zepp Health and Slyde Analytics have settled their dispute over U.S. Patent 9,804,678 and jointly moved to terminate the pending inter partes review. The Board has not yet instituted the proceeding, and the parties cite public‑policy reasons for termination.

1 •••200 201 202•••424

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Dealing with a patent challenge?

Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.

Talk to our patent team →