Industry Sector

Agriculture — India Patent Cases

213 decisions indexed

Page 8 of 8 · 213 total

patent plaintiff favorable · Jul 6, 1987

John Richard Brady And Ors. v.Chemical Process Equipments P. Ltd. And ...

Delhi High Court · AIR1987DELHI372

The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants were manufacturing machines ('pushti') that substantially imitated their patented/copyrighted Fodder Production Unit (FPU) and misappropriated confidential technical drawings, designs, and know-how. The plaintiffs sought an ad interim injunction to restrain this infringement and breach of confidence.

patent defendant favorable · Jan 14, 1986

Monsanto Company By Their Patent Agent, De Penning and Depen v.Coramandal Indag Products (P) Ltd.

Supreme Court of India · Civil Appeal No. 1490 of 1984

Monsanto challenged Coramandal Indag Products for infringing its patents related to herbicide formulations containing 'Butachlor'. The respondent argued that the patents were liable to be revoked under various sections of the Patents Act, 1970. The Supreme Court ultimately held that Butachlor was publicly known and the process of emulsification was common knowledge, thus revoking the patent.

patent defendant favorable · Dec 1, 1964

V. Manioka Thevar v.Star Plough Works, Melur

Madras High Court · O. 8 No. 3 of 1964 (Appeal)

The petitioner filed suit alleging infringement of his patent for a specific pattern of plough. The defendant contested the claim, arguing that the pattern was not original but based on prior public knowledge and invention by the defendant. The High Court dismissed the appeals, finding that the plaintiff failed to establish a strong prima facie case due to serious doubts regarding the patent's validity and its recent nature.

1 •••678
Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Dealing with a patent challenge?

Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.

Talk to our patent team →