Year

IP Cases — 1989

4 decisions across all jurisdictions

By jurisdiction: India 4 European UPC 0 US PTAB 0
By type: patent 2 design 1 trademark 1

Page 1 of 1 · 4 total

patent plaintiff favorable · Jan 19, 1989

Exite Laboratories v.A.A. Products (India) And Ors.

Delhi High Court · ILR1989DELHI679

The Delhi High Court granted a temporary injunction in favor of Exite Laboratories against A.A. Products, finding that the defendant's use of the trade mark 'EXIDE' was likely to cause confusion and constitute passing off against the plaintiff's established mark 'EXITE'. The court emphasized that prior use and acquired goodwill are critical factors in such disputes, even if the marks are not formally registered. This ruling protects established market reputation from deceptive imitation.

design defendant favorable · May 22, 1989

Bansal Plastic Industries v.Neeraj Toys Industries And Anr.

Delhi High Court

Bansal Plastic Industries filed an application seeking a temporary injunction against Neeraj Toys Industries and others for infringing its registered design of a 'Toy Horse'. The plaintiff claimed the defendant's design was identical/similar. However, the court found no justification for granting the injunction, noting differences in the shape and configuration of the horse's head.

patent plaintiff favorable · Feb 14, 1989

Thomson Brandt v.The Controller Of Patents And Designs

Delhi High Court · AIR1989DELHI249

Thomson Brandt appealed the rejection of its patent application (No. 342/Del/SO) for a process involving pacifying a gaseous medium using a boron pacifying aerosol. The appellant argued that the Controller misdirected himself by failing to consider Section 5 of the Patents Act, 1970, and incorrectly assumed that only processes resulting in tangible products could be patented.

trademark defendant favorable · Jun 8, 1989

Collector Of C. Ex. v.Bengal Chemicals And Pharmaceuticals

Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi

The dispute concerned whether medicines manufactured by Bengal Chemicals And Pharmaceuticals, which bore the registered trade mark 'Bengal Chemicals' on their caps, should be classified as 'Patent or Proprietary Medicines' under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The Tribunal held that merely having a registered trademark is not sufficient; the mark must indicate a proprietary interest in the medicine, especially when the medicines are already specified in pharmacopoeia.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a similar IP matter?

Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.

Consult our team →