Year

IP Cases — 1963

3 decisions across all jurisdictions

By jurisdiction: India 3 European UPC 0 US PTAB 0
By type: trademark 2 patent 1

Page 1 of 1 · 3 total

patent defendant favorable · Feb 20, 1963

Farbenfebriken Bayer Aktiengesellschaft v.Joint Controller Of Patents And Designs

Calcutta High Court · AIR1963CAL433

The patentee, Farbenfebriken Bayer Aktiengesellschaft, appealed against the Controller's decision to grant compulsory licenses for two patents (Nos. 43678 and 43679) to Arlabs Private Limited. The petitioner sought a certificate under Article 133(1)(c) of the Constitution to appeal further to the Supreme Court.

trademark defendant favorable · Sep 13, 1963

Sona Ana Pana Baulraj Alias Subbiah v.S.P. Vadivelu Nadar And Sons And Ors.

Madras High Court · AIR 1965 MADRAS 33

This 1963 Madras High Court judgment addressed a petition to rectify a trade mark register, specifically challenging the registration of 'Manthithope.' The respondents successfully argued that the name had acquired sufficient distinctiveness as a brand for their medicinal oil. The court ultimately dismissed the petition, affirming the validity of the registered trademark and protecting the established commercial reputation of the original proprietor.

trademark defendant favorable · Mar 4, 1963

London Rubber Co. Ltd. v.Durex Products

Supreme Court of India · Civil Appeal No. 26 of 1961

London Rubber Co. Ltd. opposed the registration of the mark 'Durex' by Durex Products, claiming prior use since 1932. The dispute centered on whether the identical marks should be refused due to potential deception under Section 8(a), or if special circumstances under Section 10(2) justified the registration.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a similar IP matter?

Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.

Consult our team →