Short Summary
BOE Technology and Paneltouch Technologies settled their inter partes review of U.S. Patent 11,126,025, leading the PTAB to terminate the proceeding and keep the settlement confidential.
Detailed Summary
In IPR2025-01267 concerning U.S. Patent 11,126,025 B2, BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. and Paneltouch Technologies LLC jointly filed motions to terminate the inter partes review after reaching a settlement and license agreement. The Board, citing good cause and the confidential nature of the agreement, granted the motions, ordered the termination of the IPRs, and required the settlement documents to be kept separate from the patent file under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). The order does not constitute a final written decision on patentability.
Practitioner Note
This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in patent matters before local courts. Understanding the court's reasoning in BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. vs Paneltouch Technologies LLC is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.
Related Cases
FRESH PRODUCTS, LLCvsSANASTAR INC.
Fresh Products sent a formal notice terminating its manufacturing agreement with Sanastar’s WizKid Products, citing the contract’s 90‑day termination clause. The exhibit was filed in IPR2025‑01339 as supporting evidence.
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.vsSecure Wi-Fi LLC
Samsung petitions an IPR to invalidate 17 claims of Secure Wi‑Fi’s 9,717,005 Wi‑Fi connection patent, asserting obviousness over Vardi, IEEE 802.11, Orava and Yun.
POSCO Co., Ltd. et al.vsARCELORMITTAL
ArcelorMittal seeks Director Review of the PTAB’s decision to institute an IPR covering claims 1‑30 of its high‑strength aluminum alloy‑coated steel patent. The owner contends the Board abused its discretion by misapplying Fintiv factors, particularly Factor One and Factor Four, in violation of §314(a).
Rode Microphones, LLC et al.vsZaxcom, Inc.
The PTAB denied Rode Microphones' request for Director Review of the institution decisions in three IPRs, including the challenge to Zaxcom's microphone patent (7,929,902). The institution rulings therefore remain in force.
Phison Electronics CorporationvsVervain, LLC
The PTAB denied Phison's post‑grant review petition against Vervain’s NAND‑flash storage patent, finding the challenger had not shown a more‑likely‑than‑not chance of unpatentability for any of the seven claims.
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.
Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.