Short Summary
MSN Pharmaceuticals and its affiliate filed a supplemental certificate of service to confirm that the IPR petition and related documents were delivered to Breckenridge Pharmaceutical. The filing complies with USPTO service rules.
Detailed Summary
In a procedural filing dated June 20, 2025, MSN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and MSN Laboratories Private Limited submitted a supplemental certificate of service for their petition for inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 11,113,729 owned by Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc. The document, signed by lead counsel Noorossadat Torabi of Merchant & Gould P.C., certifies that the petition, exhibit list, and power of attorney were served on the patent owner via priority overnight FedEx, satisfying the requirements of 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e)(4) and 42.105. No substantive arguments, claim constructions, or prior art references are presented in this filing.
Practitioner Note
This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in patent matters before local courts. Understanding the court's reasoning in MSN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al. vs Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc. is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.
Related Cases
Charter Communications, Inc. et al.vsAdaptive Spectrum and Signal Alignment, Inc.
The PTAB denied Charter Communications' IPR against Adaptive Spectrum and Signal Alignment regarding network performance patents. The Board cited the proximity of a parallel district court trial date to the statutory deadline as a key factor favoring denial.
Toyota Motor Corporation et al.vsInfogation Corp.
Toyota and Infogation settled their IPR dispute over patent 6,292,743 B1, leading the Board to dismiss the case before a trial. The settlement agreement is treated as confidential under statutory provisions.
Google LLC et al.vsCerence Operating Company et al.
Cerence Operating Company successfully defended the PTAB’s discretionary denial of institution for its voice‑assistant patent, arguing that the Board acted within authority and that petitioners’ due‑process claims were unfounded.
Deltran USA LLC et al.vsThe Noco Company
The PTAB held that all seven claims of The Noco Company's portable jump‑starter patent are unpatentable, finding them obvious over prior‑art jump‑starter and USB‑charging references. The decision follows a petition by Deltran USA LLC asserting obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Charter Communications, Inc. et al.vsTouchstream Technologies, Inc.
The PTAB denied Charter Communications' IPR petition against Touchstream Technologies, citing failure to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on unpatentability grounds and procedural bar under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b). The Board also construed key terms like 'first format' as distinct from 'second format.'
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.
Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.